父母童年因素作为多代人社会经济和社会心理风险的中介:一项三代人的队列研究

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Baojing Li , Can Liu , Ylva B. Almquist , Ingrid Schoon , Lisa Berg
{"title":"父母童年因素作为多代人社会经济和社会心理风险的中介:一项三代人的队列研究","authors":"Baojing Li ,&nbsp;Can Liu ,&nbsp;Ylva B. Almquist ,&nbsp;Ingrid Schoon ,&nbsp;Lisa Berg","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has begun to unravel the mechanisms by which multiple factors in the parental generation link grandparental socioeconomic disadvantages to grandchild psychiatric disorders. This study aims to further disentangle such multigenerational mechanisms by exploring the role of parental childhood factors. We utilized a three-generational cohort study design with data from the Stockholm Birth Cohort Multigenerational Study. The sample included 2,708 individuals born in 1953 (parental generation, G1), their 5,416 parents (grandparental generation, G0), and 5,967 children (grandchild generation, G2). Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed the mediating role of G1 protective factors during childhood (i.e., high family relationship quality, positive parenting styles, high educational performance, positive peer relationships) and G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages (i.e., single parenthood, psychiatric disorders, and criminality) in the association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages (i.e., low income, non-employment, and overcrowding) and G2 psychiatric disorders (i.e., measured as hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders between ages 18 and 30). The association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages and G2 psychiatric disorders was mediated through the paths from G1 childhood family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance to G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages. Peer relationships and educational performance in childhood mattered more among G1 fathers, whereas family relationship quality in childhood played a more important role among G1 mothers. The findings indicate that parental childhood factors – specifically family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance – serve as important resilience resources in disrupting the multigenerational transmission of disadvantages, with implications for mental health of future generations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental childhood factors as mediators of multigenerational socioeconomic and psychosocial risks: A cohort study of three generations\",\"authors\":\"Baojing Li ,&nbsp;Can Liu ,&nbsp;Ylva B. Almquist ,&nbsp;Ingrid Schoon ,&nbsp;Lisa Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous research has begun to unravel the mechanisms by which multiple factors in the parental generation link grandparental socioeconomic disadvantages to grandchild psychiatric disorders. This study aims to further disentangle such multigenerational mechanisms by exploring the role of parental childhood factors. We utilized a three-generational cohort study design with data from the Stockholm Birth Cohort Multigenerational Study. The sample included 2,708 individuals born in 1953 (parental generation, G1), their 5,416 parents (grandparental generation, G0), and 5,967 children (grandchild generation, G2). Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed the mediating role of G1 protective factors during childhood (i.e., high family relationship quality, positive parenting styles, high educational performance, positive peer relationships) and G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages (i.e., single parenthood, psychiatric disorders, and criminality) in the association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages (i.e., low income, non-employment, and overcrowding) and G2 psychiatric disorders (i.e., measured as hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders between ages 18 and 30). The association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages and G2 psychiatric disorders was mediated through the paths from G1 childhood family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance to G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages. Peer relationships and educational performance in childhood mattered more among G1 fathers, whereas family relationship quality in childhood played a more important role among G1 mothers. The findings indicate that parental childhood factors – specifically family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance – serve as important resilience resources in disrupting the multigenerational transmission of disadvantages, with implications for mental health of future generations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325001380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325001380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究已经开始揭示父母世代中的多种因素将祖父母的社会经济劣势与孙子的精神疾病联系起来的机制。本研究旨在通过探讨父母童年因素的作用,进一步解开这种多代机制。我们采用了来自斯德哥尔摩出生队列多代研究数据的三代队列研究设计。样本包括2708名1953年出生的人(父母一代,G1),他们的5416名父母(祖父母一代,G0)和5967名子女(孙子一代,G2)。利用结构方程模型(SEM),我们分析了童年期G1保护因素(即高家庭关系质量、积极的父母教养方式、高教育表现、积极的同伴关系)和成年期G1社会心理劣势(即单亲、精神障碍和犯罪)在G0社会经济劣势(即低收入、失业和过度拥挤)与G2精神障碍(即:以18岁至30岁之间因精神和行为障碍而住院的人数来衡量。G0社会经济劣势与G2精神障碍之间的关联是通过G1童年家庭关系质量、同伴关系和教育表现到G1成年社会心理劣势的路径介导的。G1父亲对同伴关系和童年教育表现的影响更大,而G1母亲对童年家庭关系质量的影响更大。研究结果表明,父母童年时期的因素——特别是家庭关系质量、同伴关系和教育表现——是破坏不利因素多代传递的重要弹性资源,并对后代的心理健康产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental childhood factors as mediators of multigenerational socioeconomic and psychosocial risks: A cohort study of three generations
Previous research has begun to unravel the mechanisms by which multiple factors in the parental generation link grandparental socioeconomic disadvantages to grandchild psychiatric disorders. This study aims to further disentangle such multigenerational mechanisms by exploring the role of parental childhood factors. We utilized a three-generational cohort study design with data from the Stockholm Birth Cohort Multigenerational Study. The sample included 2,708 individuals born in 1953 (parental generation, G1), their 5,416 parents (grandparental generation, G0), and 5,967 children (grandchild generation, G2). Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed the mediating role of G1 protective factors during childhood (i.e., high family relationship quality, positive parenting styles, high educational performance, positive peer relationships) and G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages (i.e., single parenthood, psychiatric disorders, and criminality) in the association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages (i.e., low income, non-employment, and overcrowding) and G2 psychiatric disorders (i.e., measured as hospitalizations due to mental and behavioral disorders between ages 18 and 30). The association between G0 socioeconomic disadvantages and G2 psychiatric disorders was mediated through the paths from G1 childhood family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance to G1 adult psychosocial disadvantages. Peer relationships and educational performance in childhood mattered more among G1 fathers, whereas family relationship quality in childhood played a more important role among G1 mothers. The findings indicate that parental childhood factors – specifically family relationship quality, peer relationships, and educational performance – serve as important resilience resources in disrupting the multigenerational transmission of disadvantages, with implications for mental health of future generations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信