高收入国家计划生育方式对妇女的偏好和决策有什么影响?定性系统评价

Moira D. Cruickshank PhD , Clare Robertson MSc , Miriam G. Brazzelli PhD , Aniebiet I. Ekong PhD , Mo Ade PGCE (Secondary Education) , Pauline Mcdonagh Hull PGDip (BJTC) , Paul D. Manson PGDip , Debra E. Bick PhD , Denitza O. Williams PhD (Medicine) , Gillian Taylor Registration Midwife , Lilla A. Ward Legal Practice Course , Mary M. Kilonzo MSc , Tara E. Fairley MBChB , Siladitya Bhattacharya MD , Louise Locock PhD , Magdalena Rzewuska Diaz PhD , Mairead E. Black PhD
{"title":"高收入国家计划生育方式对妇女的偏好和决策有什么影响?定性系统评价","authors":"Moira D. Cruickshank PhD ,&nbsp;Clare Robertson MSc ,&nbsp;Miriam G. Brazzelli PhD ,&nbsp;Aniebiet I. Ekong PhD ,&nbsp;Mo Ade PGCE (Secondary Education) ,&nbsp;Pauline Mcdonagh Hull PGDip (BJTC) ,&nbsp;Paul D. Manson PGDip ,&nbsp;Debra E. Bick PhD ,&nbsp;Denitza O. Williams PhD (Medicine) ,&nbsp;Gillian Taylor Registration Midwife ,&nbsp;Lilla A. Ward Legal Practice Course ,&nbsp;Mary M. Kilonzo MSc ,&nbsp;Tara E. Fairley MBChB ,&nbsp;Siladitya Bhattacharya MD ,&nbsp;Louise Locock PhD ,&nbsp;Magdalena Rzewuska Diaz PhD ,&nbsp;Mairead E. Black PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In antenatal care in the UK NHS, the concept of choice of mode of birth (MOB) has been recommended for some years but is still poorly operationalised. Proactive, routine provision of balanced and relevant information to women in antenatal care can be supported by using decision aids but such an aid does not currently exist. The objective of this qualitative systematic review was to identify the factors shaping women’s MOB preference and the barriers and facilitators to supported MOB decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Seven major electronic databases were searched for articles published in English between 2011 and November 2022. Study eligibility criteria Eligible studies were of any design and provided qualitative data from currently or previously pregnant women in high-income countries, about reasons for MOB preference, and/or barriers or facilitators to women making supported MOB choices. Data were extracted into a pre-designed data extraction form. Identified subthemes were grouped and mapped onto two preestablished global themes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP tool for qualitative research. Confidence in the findings was assessed using GRADECERQual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women’s preferences for MOB were shaped by perceptions of advantages or disadvantages of each MOB and their own or other women’s previous birth experiences. Barriers to informed MOB decision-making were mainly relating to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) negative attitudes, which limited women’s perceived options, and women’s own strong personal beliefs and opinions. Facilitators included having time, support and information on which to make a robust decision.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Barriers to supported decision-making about MOB still exist. HCPs are well placed to guide women through the decision-making process. Informed implementation of decision aids has the potential to address barriers in supported decision-making about MOB in routine NHS antenatal care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the influences on women’s preferences and decision-making when planning mode of birth in high-income countries? A qualitative systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Moira D. Cruickshank PhD ,&nbsp;Clare Robertson MSc ,&nbsp;Miriam G. Brazzelli PhD ,&nbsp;Aniebiet I. Ekong PhD ,&nbsp;Mo Ade PGCE (Secondary Education) ,&nbsp;Pauline Mcdonagh Hull PGDip (BJTC) ,&nbsp;Paul D. Manson PGDip ,&nbsp;Debra E. Bick PhD ,&nbsp;Denitza O. Williams PhD (Medicine) ,&nbsp;Gillian Taylor Registration Midwife ,&nbsp;Lilla A. Ward Legal Practice Course ,&nbsp;Mary M. Kilonzo MSc ,&nbsp;Tara E. Fairley MBChB ,&nbsp;Siladitya Bhattacharya MD ,&nbsp;Louise Locock PhD ,&nbsp;Magdalena Rzewuska Diaz PhD ,&nbsp;Mairead E. Black PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In antenatal care in the UK NHS, the concept of choice of mode of birth (MOB) has been recommended for some years but is still poorly operationalised. Proactive, routine provision of balanced and relevant information to women in antenatal care can be supported by using decision aids but such an aid does not currently exist. The objective of this qualitative systematic review was to identify the factors shaping women’s MOB preference and the barriers and facilitators to supported MOB decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Seven major electronic databases were searched for articles published in English between 2011 and November 2022. Study eligibility criteria Eligible studies were of any design and provided qualitative data from currently or previously pregnant women in high-income countries, about reasons for MOB preference, and/or barriers or facilitators to women making supported MOB choices. Data were extracted into a pre-designed data extraction form. Identified subthemes were grouped and mapped onto two preestablished global themes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP tool for qualitative research. Confidence in the findings was assessed using GRADECERQual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women’s preferences for MOB were shaped by perceptions of advantages or disadvantages of each MOB and their own or other women’s previous birth experiences. Barriers to informed MOB decision-making were mainly relating to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) negative attitudes, which limited women’s perceived options, and women’s own strong personal beliefs and opinions. Facilitators included having time, support and information on which to make a robust decision.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Barriers to supported decision-making about MOB still exist. HCPs are well placed to guide women through the decision-making process. Informed implementation of decision aids has the potential to address barriers in supported decision-making about MOB in routine NHS antenatal care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825001170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825001170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在英国国民健康保险制度的产前保健中,选择分娩方式(MOB)的概念已经被推荐了几年,但仍然很少实施。可以通过使用决策辅助工具来支持向妇女提供产前保健方面的主动、常规和平衡的相关信息,但目前还不存在这种辅助工具。本定性系统回顾的目的是确定影响妇女MOB偏好的因素,以及支持MOB决策的障碍和促进因素。数据来源在7个主要的电子数据库中搜索了2011年至2022年11月期间发表的英文文章。符合条件的研究采用任何设计,并提供来自高收入国家当前或曾经怀孕的妇女的定性数据,说明孕妇偏好孕产的原因,和/或阻碍或促进妇女选择孕产的因素。将数据提取到预先设计的数据提取表单中。已确定的子主题被分组并映射到两个预先确定的全球主题。使用CASP工具进行定性研究,评估研究质量。使用GRADECERQual评估调查结果的可信度。结果女性对MOB的偏好是由对每个MOB的优缺点以及自己或其他女性以前的生育经历所决定的。MOB知情决策的障碍主要与卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)的消极态度有关,这种态度限制了妇女的感知选择,以及妇女自己强烈的个人信仰和意见。辅助因素包括有时间、支持和信息来做出强有力的决定。结论MOB辅助决策障碍依然存在。医务人员在指导妇女完成决策过程方面处于有利地位。决策辅助的知情实施有可能解决在常规NHS产前保健中支持MOB决策的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What are the influences on women’s preferences and decision-making when planning mode of birth in high-income countries? A qualitative systematic review

Objective

In antenatal care in the UK NHS, the concept of choice of mode of birth (MOB) has been recommended for some years but is still poorly operationalised. Proactive, routine provision of balanced and relevant information to women in antenatal care can be supported by using decision aids but such an aid does not currently exist. The objective of this qualitative systematic review was to identify the factors shaping women’s MOB preference and the barriers and facilitators to supported MOB decision-making.

Data sources

Seven major electronic databases were searched for articles published in English between 2011 and November 2022. Study eligibility criteria Eligible studies were of any design and provided qualitative data from currently or previously pregnant women in high-income countries, about reasons for MOB preference, and/or barriers or facilitators to women making supported MOB choices. Data were extracted into a pre-designed data extraction form. Identified subthemes were grouped and mapped onto two preestablished global themes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP tool for qualitative research. Confidence in the findings was assessed using GRADECERQual.

Results

Women’s preferences for MOB were shaped by perceptions of advantages or disadvantages of each MOB and their own or other women’s previous birth experiences. Barriers to informed MOB decision-making were mainly relating to healthcare professionals’ (HCPs’) negative attitudes, which limited women’s perceived options, and women’s own strong personal beliefs and opinions. Facilitators included having time, support and information on which to make a robust decision.

Conclusions

Barriers to supported decision-making about MOB still exist. HCPs are well placed to guide women through the decision-making process. Informed implementation of decision aids has the potential to address barriers in supported decision-making about MOB in routine NHS antenatal care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信