Zixuan Liu , Shiquan Zhong , Ning Jia , Jiemin Zhang , Likchern Lee
{"title":"当感觉在直播商业中退居次要地位时:虚拟主播与真人主播对消费者冲动购买的影响","authors":"Zixuan Liu , Shiquan Zhong , Ning Jia , Jiemin Zhang , Likchern Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the growing trend of adopting virtual streamers (VSs) in livestream, their performances have fallen short of expectations. As a dynamic and interactive format, livestream inherently induces impulsive buying behaviors. However, it remains unclear how VSs influence consumers' impulsive buying compared to human streamers (HSs). To answer this question, four scenario-based experiments were conducted based on the affective-cognitive model. The findings reveal that compared to HSs, VSs reduce consumers' impulsive buying (Study 1). When engaging with VSs (vs. HSs), consumers prioritize more reason-based (or less feeling-based) decision-making strategies, thus decreasing their impulsive buying (Study 2). By measuring consumers' time orientation (Study 3a) and manipulating it through communication strategies (Study 3b), Study 3 reveals that present orientation (vs. future orientation) can mitigate the negative effect of VSs on impulsive buying. These findings contribute to deepening the understanding of VSs’ livestream performances, as well as provide practical insights for optimizing streamer arrangements to promote impulsive buying in livestream commerce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 104517"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When feeling takes a backseat in livestream commerce: The effects of virtual versus human streamers on consumers’ impulsive buying\",\"authors\":\"Zixuan Liu , Shiquan Zhong , Ning Jia , Jiemin Zhang , Likchern Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the growing trend of adopting virtual streamers (VSs) in livestream, their performances have fallen short of expectations. As a dynamic and interactive format, livestream inherently induces impulsive buying behaviors. However, it remains unclear how VSs influence consumers' impulsive buying compared to human streamers (HSs). To answer this question, four scenario-based experiments were conducted based on the affective-cognitive model. The findings reveal that compared to HSs, VSs reduce consumers' impulsive buying (Study 1). When engaging with VSs (vs. HSs), consumers prioritize more reason-based (or less feeling-based) decision-making strategies, thus decreasing their impulsive buying (Study 2). By measuring consumers' time orientation (Study 3a) and manipulating it through communication strategies (Study 3b), Study 3 reveals that present orientation (vs. future orientation) can mitigate the negative effect of VSs on impulsive buying. These findings contribute to deepening the understanding of VSs’ livestream performances, as well as provide practical insights for optimizing streamer arrangements to promote impulsive buying in livestream commerce.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925002966\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925002966","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
When feeling takes a backseat in livestream commerce: The effects of virtual versus human streamers on consumers’ impulsive buying
Despite the growing trend of adopting virtual streamers (VSs) in livestream, their performances have fallen short of expectations. As a dynamic and interactive format, livestream inherently induces impulsive buying behaviors. However, it remains unclear how VSs influence consumers' impulsive buying compared to human streamers (HSs). To answer this question, four scenario-based experiments were conducted based on the affective-cognitive model. The findings reveal that compared to HSs, VSs reduce consumers' impulsive buying (Study 1). When engaging with VSs (vs. HSs), consumers prioritize more reason-based (or less feeling-based) decision-making strategies, thus decreasing their impulsive buying (Study 2). By measuring consumers' time orientation (Study 3a) and manipulating it through communication strategies (Study 3b), Study 3 reveals that present orientation (vs. future orientation) can mitigate the negative effect of VSs on impulsive buying. These findings contribute to deepening the understanding of VSs’ livestream performances, as well as provide practical insights for optimizing streamer arrangements to promote impulsive buying in livestream commerce.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are:
Retailing and the sale of goods
The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.