PFAS在生物固体:洞察当前和未来的挑战

IF 8.1 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Prashant Srivastava , Becky Macdonald
{"title":"PFAS在生物固体:洞察当前和未来的挑战","authors":"Prashant Srivastava ,&nbsp;Becky Macdonald","doi":"10.1016/j.hazl.2025.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biosolids, valued as nutrient-rich soil amendments, are now approached cautiously by farmers due to growing public concern, and increasingly stringent and varying per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulatory standards across jurisdictions. PFAS concentrations in biosolids vary widely between countries and wastewater treatment plants. Inconsistent monitoring and testing protocols hinder accurate assessment and comparison across sites. The fragmented regulatory landscape, with diverse thresholds and evolving requirements, complicates compliance and long-term planning for water utilities, challenging infrastructure investment. A key issue is lack of proven, scalable PFAS treatment technologies for municipal wastewater plants. Current solutions often lack performance, cost-effectiveness, and practicality at scale. Utilities face financial burdens for monitoring and remediation while balancing other priorities, like managing emerging contaminants and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy-intensive processes. Effective source control to limit PFAS entry into wastewater systems is critical and cost-effective. Integrated strategies targeting multiple pollutants can optimize investments. Clear, science-based regulatory standards for PFAS in biosolids are urgently needed to guide compliance. Collaboration among utilities, academia, technology providers, and stakeholders, supported by transparent engagement, is essential for practical PFAS management solutions and rebuilding public trust. Sustainable biosolids management depends on evidence-based, interdisciplinary efforts integrating technological innovation, regulatory clarity, and socioecological resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials letters","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFAS in biosolids: Insights into current and future challenges\",\"authors\":\"Prashant Srivastava ,&nbsp;Becky Macdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hazl.2025.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biosolids, valued as nutrient-rich soil amendments, are now approached cautiously by farmers due to growing public concern, and increasingly stringent and varying per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulatory standards across jurisdictions. PFAS concentrations in biosolids vary widely between countries and wastewater treatment plants. Inconsistent monitoring and testing protocols hinder accurate assessment and comparison across sites. The fragmented regulatory landscape, with diverse thresholds and evolving requirements, complicates compliance and long-term planning for water utilities, challenging infrastructure investment. A key issue is lack of proven, scalable PFAS treatment technologies for municipal wastewater plants. Current solutions often lack performance, cost-effectiveness, and practicality at scale. Utilities face financial burdens for monitoring and remediation while balancing other priorities, like managing emerging contaminants and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy-intensive processes. Effective source control to limit PFAS entry into wastewater systems is critical and cost-effective. Integrated strategies targeting multiple pollutants can optimize investments. Clear, science-based regulatory standards for PFAS in biosolids are urgently needed to guide compliance. Collaboration among utilities, academia, technology providers, and stakeholders, supported by transparent engagement, is essential for practical PFAS management solutions and rebuilding public trust. Sustainable biosolids management depends on evidence-based, interdisciplinary efforts integrating technological innovation, regulatory clarity, and socioecological resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials letters\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666911025000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666911025000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于公众日益关注,以及各司法管辖区的单氟烷基物质和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)监管标准日益严格和不同,农民现在谨慎对待作为富营养土壤改进剂的生物固体。在不同国家和污水处理厂之间,生物固体中的PFAS浓度差别很大。不一致的监测和测试协议妨碍了各站点之间的准确评估和比较。分散的监管格局,不同的门槛和不断变化的要求,使水务公司的合规和长期规划变得复杂,对基础设施投资构成挑战。一个关键问题是缺乏成熟的、可扩展的PFAS处理技术用于城市污水处理厂。当前的解决方案通常缺乏性能、成本效益和大规模的实用性。在平衡其他优先事项(如管理新出现的污染物和减少能源密集型过程的温室气体排放)的同时,公用事业公司面临着监测和补救的财政负担。有效的源头控制以限制PFAS进入废水系统是至关重要且具有成本效益的。针对多种污染物的综合战略可以优化投资。迫切需要明确、科学的PFAS生物固体监管标准来指导合规。公用事业、学术界、技术提供商和利益相关者之间的合作,在透明参与的支持下,对于实用的PFAS管理解决方案和重建公众信任至关重要。可持续的生物固体管理取决于基于证据的跨学科努力,包括技术创新、监管清晰度和社会生态弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PFAS in biosolids: Insights into current and future challenges
Biosolids, valued as nutrient-rich soil amendments, are now approached cautiously by farmers due to growing public concern, and increasingly stringent and varying per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) regulatory standards across jurisdictions. PFAS concentrations in biosolids vary widely between countries and wastewater treatment plants. Inconsistent monitoring and testing protocols hinder accurate assessment and comparison across sites. The fragmented regulatory landscape, with diverse thresholds and evolving requirements, complicates compliance and long-term planning for water utilities, challenging infrastructure investment. A key issue is lack of proven, scalable PFAS treatment technologies for municipal wastewater plants. Current solutions often lack performance, cost-effectiveness, and practicality at scale. Utilities face financial burdens for monitoring and remediation while balancing other priorities, like managing emerging contaminants and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy-intensive processes. Effective source control to limit PFAS entry into wastewater systems is critical and cost-effective. Integrated strategies targeting multiple pollutants can optimize investments. Clear, science-based regulatory standards for PFAS in biosolids are urgently needed to guide compliance. Collaboration among utilities, academia, technology providers, and stakeholders, supported by transparent engagement, is essential for practical PFAS management solutions and rebuilding public trust. Sustainable biosolids management depends on evidence-based, interdisciplinary efforts integrating technological innovation, regulatory clarity, and socioecological resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials letters
Journal of hazardous materials letters Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Waste Management and Disposal, Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信