{"title":"能源系统弹性:制定能源政策制定的指导概念","authors":"Johanes Narasetu Widyatmanto","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper aims to define energy system resilience (ESR) in a way that can guide energy policymakers in designing, maintaining, and improving energy systems. The concept of resilience has become increasingly popular in the last two decades. Particularly in energy system design, the term ESR – sometimes synonymously called energy resilience – often appears in academic works and public policy domains alongside themes such as energy sustainability, energy transition, etc. However, the literature rarely provides a normative goal for ESR, such that it is not sufficiently action-guiding for energy policymaking. In this work, we define ESR in a way that incorporates technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal. Beginning with the general conception of resilience as ‘bouncing back’, and tracing how resilience is used in energy systems, we then illustrate how ESR is used across the literature, analyse a selection of studies which provide explicit ESR definitions, and formulate a new comprehensive definition. Containing technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal, we define ESR as the readiness of an energy system to bounce forward amidst anticipated and unanticipated disruptions in order to provide a sufficient and stable energy supply through reliable engineering techniques, efficient management, and conducive social institutions. We then operationalise this comprehensive definition in energy policymaking. Finally, we provide a summary of this paper and indicate what might limit the impact of its findings, namely, that ESR is but one aspect to address in energy system design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104332"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy system resilience: Formulating a guiding concept for energy policymaking\",\"authors\":\"Johanes Narasetu Widyatmanto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper aims to define energy system resilience (ESR) in a way that can guide energy policymakers in designing, maintaining, and improving energy systems. The concept of resilience has become increasingly popular in the last two decades. Particularly in energy system design, the term ESR – sometimes synonymously called energy resilience – often appears in academic works and public policy domains alongside themes such as energy sustainability, energy transition, etc. However, the literature rarely provides a normative goal for ESR, such that it is not sufficiently action-guiding for energy policymaking. In this work, we define ESR in a way that incorporates technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal. Beginning with the general conception of resilience as ‘bouncing back’, and tracing how resilience is used in energy systems, we then illustrate how ESR is used across the literature, analyse a selection of studies which provide explicit ESR definitions, and formulate a new comprehensive definition. Containing technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal, we define ESR as the readiness of an energy system to bounce forward amidst anticipated and unanticipated disruptions in order to provide a sufficient and stable energy supply through reliable engineering techniques, efficient management, and conducive social institutions. We then operationalise this comprehensive definition in energy policymaking. Finally, we provide a summary of this paper and indicate what might limit the impact of its findings, namely, that ESR is but one aspect to address in energy system design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500413X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500413X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy system resilience: Formulating a guiding concept for energy policymaking
This paper aims to define energy system resilience (ESR) in a way that can guide energy policymakers in designing, maintaining, and improving energy systems. The concept of resilience has become increasingly popular in the last two decades. Particularly in energy system design, the term ESR – sometimes synonymously called energy resilience – often appears in academic works and public policy domains alongside themes such as energy sustainability, energy transition, etc. However, the literature rarely provides a normative goal for ESR, such that it is not sufficiently action-guiding for energy policymaking. In this work, we define ESR in a way that incorporates technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal. Beginning with the general conception of resilience as ‘bouncing back’, and tracing how resilience is used in energy systems, we then illustrate how ESR is used across the literature, analyse a selection of studies which provide explicit ESR definitions, and formulate a new comprehensive definition. Containing technical characteristics, socio-technical means, and an ethical goal, we define ESR as the readiness of an energy system to bounce forward amidst anticipated and unanticipated disruptions in order to provide a sufficient and stable energy supply through reliable engineering techniques, efficient management, and conducive social institutions. We then operationalise this comprehensive definition in energy policymaking. Finally, we provide a summary of this paper and indicate what might limit the impact of its findings, namely, that ESR is but one aspect to address in energy system design.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.