{"title":"非正式性与发展:用阈值证据重新审视非线性动力学","authors":"Segun Thompson Bolarinwa, Munacinga Simatele","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the nonlinear and threshold-based impact of informality on economic development across 150 countries from 1990 to 2020. Drawing on dualistic and institutional economic theories, it employs a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model (DPTM) to endogenously identify levels of informality beyond which the effect of informality on development shifts. Our findings reveal significant threshold effects. The analysis reveals that informality can support development in low-income and institutionally weak contexts but becomes detrimental in more advanced economies. Region-specific thresholds are estimated: informality remains growth-enhancing below ∼20 % globally and ∼37–40 % in African economies but has adverse effects in high-income countries even at low levels. Institutional quality and financial development also influence the nature of these dynamics. These findings challenge one-size-fits-all formalisation policies, suggesting that tailored, more context-specific interventions are likely to be more fruitful.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 112588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informality and development: Revisiting the nonlinear dynamics with threshold evidence\",\"authors\":\"Segun Thompson Bolarinwa, Munacinga Simatele\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the nonlinear and threshold-based impact of informality on economic development across 150 countries from 1990 to 2020. Drawing on dualistic and institutional economic theories, it employs a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model (DPTM) to endogenously identify levels of informality beyond which the effect of informality on development shifts. Our findings reveal significant threshold effects. The analysis reveals that informality can support development in low-income and institutionally weak contexts but becomes detrimental in more advanced economies. Region-specific thresholds are estimated: informality remains growth-enhancing below ∼20 % globally and ∼37–40 % in African economies but has adverse effects in high-income countries even at low levels. Institutional quality and financial development also influence the nature of these dynamics. These findings challenge one-size-fits-all formalisation policies, suggesting that tailored, more context-specific interventions are likely to be more fruitful.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":\"256 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176525004252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Informality and development: Revisiting the nonlinear dynamics with threshold evidence
This paper investigates the nonlinear and threshold-based impact of informality on economic development across 150 countries from 1990 to 2020. Drawing on dualistic and institutional economic theories, it employs a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model (DPTM) to endogenously identify levels of informality beyond which the effect of informality on development shifts. Our findings reveal significant threshold effects. The analysis reveals that informality can support development in low-income and institutionally weak contexts but becomes detrimental in more advanced economies. Region-specific thresholds are estimated: informality remains growth-enhancing below ∼20 % globally and ∼37–40 % in African economies but has adverse effects in high-income countries even at low levels. Institutional quality and financial development also influence the nature of these dynamics. These findings challenge one-size-fits-all formalisation policies, suggesting that tailored, more context-specific interventions are likely to be more fruitful.
期刊介绍:
Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.