全球能源转型能否在应对气候变化方面实现代际公平?

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Muhammad Shahid Siddiqui
{"title":"全球能源转型能否在应对气候变化方面实现代际公平?","authors":"Muhammad Shahid Siddiqui","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Slacking in current global climate change actions precipitates inequality in intergenerational burden sharing in climate mitigation efforts and shifts a tremendous emissions mitigation challenge to future generations. The existing literature on climate mitigation scenarios reflects slacking in global climate actions by showing increasing shadow costs of emissions abatement over time without linking any intergenerational climate burden sharing issue. This non-trivial issue deserves an explicit coverage in climate change scenarios. This paper adds novelty in literature by offering conceptual and numerical solutions that ensure equity in intergenerational climate change efforts fundamentally through a surge in current climate change mitigation actions. The surge in global climate action is essentially an outcome of mobilizing the carbon revenues into climate financing allocated to clean technologies. Our methodology maintains a zero balanced climate-financing while searching for a uniform global carbon pricing over time as well as a set of dynamically adjusted global subsidy rates by sectors and technologies. The trajectory of this global policy package must also limit the global mean temperature to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The results of our conceptual and numerical analyses achieved the stated global 1.5 °C target with a minimal temperature overshooting along with efficiency as well as equity in intra- and intergenerational climate mitigation costs. In other words, the study emphasizes on the effectiveness of a global (supranational) setup in managing climate policy and mobilizing climate funds when the surge in global climate mitigation and just energy transition is contingent with all-inclusiveness, including intergenerational ethics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108159"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can global energy transition be possible with intergenerational equity in climate efforts?\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Shahid Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Slacking in current global climate change actions precipitates inequality in intergenerational burden sharing in climate mitigation efforts and shifts a tremendous emissions mitigation challenge to future generations. The existing literature on climate mitigation scenarios reflects slacking in global climate actions by showing increasing shadow costs of emissions abatement over time without linking any intergenerational climate burden sharing issue. This non-trivial issue deserves an explicit coverage in climate change scenarios. This paper adds novelty in literature by offering conceptual and numerical solutions that ensure equity in intergenerational climate change efforts fundamentally through a surge in current climate change mitigation actions. The surge in global climate action is essentially an outcome of mobilizing the carbon revenues into climate financing allocated to clean technologies. Our methodology maintains a zero balanced climate-financing while searching for a uniform global carbon pricing over time as well as a set of dynamically adjusted global subsidy rates by sectors and technologies. The trajectory of this global policy package must also limit the global mean temperature to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The results of our conceptual and numerical analyses achieved the stated global 1.5 °C target with a minimal temperature overshooting along with efficiency as well as equity in intra- and intergenerational climate mitigation costs. In other words, the study emphasizes on the effectiveness of a global (supranational) setup in managing climate policy and mobilizing climate funds when the surge in global climate mitigation and just energy transition is contingent with all-inclusiveness, including intergenerational ethics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003567\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前全球气候变化行动的懈怠加剧了代际间在减缓气候变化努力中的负担分担方面的不平等,并将减缓排放的巨大挑战转移给后代。关于气候减缓情景的现有文献显示,随着时间的推移,减排的影子成本不断增加,而没有将任何代际气候负担分担问题联系起来,这反映了全球气候行动的懈怠。这个重要的问题应该在气候变化情景中得到明确的报道。本文通过提供概念和数字解决方案,增加了文献的新颖性,通过当前气候变化减缓行动的激增,从根本上确保代际气候变化努力的公平性。全球气候行动的激增,本质上是将碳收入调拨到用于清洁技术的气候融资中的结果。我们的方法保持了零平衡的气候融资,同时寻求一种统一的全球碳定价,以及一套按行业和技术动态调整的全球补贴率。这一全球一揽子政策的轨迹还必须在2100年前将全球平均温度限制在比工业化前水平高1.5°C。我们的概念和数值分析的结果实现了全球1.5°C的既定目标,温度超调最小,同时在代际和代际气候减缓成本方面效率和公平。换句话说,该研究强调,当全球气候减缓和公正的能源转型的激增取决于包括代际伦理在内的包容性因素时,全球(超国家)设置在管理气候政策和动员气候资金方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can global energy transition be possible with intergenerational equity in climate efforts?
Slacking in current global climate change actions precipitates inequality in intergenerational burden sharing in climate mitigation efforts and shifts a tremendous emissions mitigation challenge to future generations. The existing literature on climate mitigation scenarios reflects slacking in global climate actions by showing increasing shadow costs of emissions abatement over time without linking any intergenerational climate burden sharing issue. This non-trivial issue deserves an explicit coverage in climate change scenarios. This paper adds novelty in literature by offering conceptual and numerical solutions that ensure equity in intergenerational climate change efforts fundamentally through a surge in current climate change mitigation actions. The surge in global climate action is essentially an outcome of mobilizing the carbon revenues into climate financing allocated to clean technologies. Our methodology maintains a zero balanced climate-financing while searching for a uniform global carbon pricing over time as well as a set of dynamically adjusted global subsidy rates by sectors and technologies. The trajectory of this global policy package must also limit the global mean temperature to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels by 2100. The results of our conceptual and numerical analyses achieved the stated global 1.5 °C target with a minimal temperature overshooting along with efficiency as well as equity in intra- and intergenerational climate mitigation costs. In other words, the study emphasizes on the effectiveness of a global (supranational) setup in managing climate policy and mobilizing climate funds when the surge in global climate mitigation and just energy transition is contingent with all-inclusiveness, including intergenerational ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信