{"title":"北安纳托利亚断裂带大地震同步化模拟及其意义","authors":"E. Sopacı , A.A. Özacar","doi":"10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) zone has consistently exhibited a sequence of westward-migrating earthquakes with magnitudes exceeding 7 (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub><mo>></mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span>) during its last three seismic cycles. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this behavior, we conducted multi-cycle simulations using a rate-and-state friction (RSF) model. The model incorporates three seismogenic asperities aligned along the fault strike, separated by barriers that inhibit rupture propagation. By simulating spontaneously occurring earthquakes, we analyzed variations in the timing of large events across the asperities. Our results indicate that both the strength and length of the barriers play a critical role in controlling the coupling between asperities, while variations in asperity length exert a relatively minor influence. Simulations with very weak barriers—permitting rupture jumps between asperities—and very strong barriers—limiting stress transfer—tended to produce synchronized earthquake cycles. In contrast, intermediate-strength barriers that allowed limited stress transfer generated more variable, non-synchronized cycles. These findings suggest that faults coupled primarily through static stress transfer are more prone to desynchronization, whereas those coupled via dynamic triggering or afterslip may maintain synchronization over multiple cycles. Although the model is simplified, it offers meaningful insights into the seismic behavior of the NAF and contributes to a deeper understanding of fault system dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22257,"journal":{"name":"Tectonophysics","volume":"914 ","pages":"Article 230902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of large earthquake synchronization and implications on North Anatolian fault zone\",\"authors\":\"E. Sopacı , A.A. Özacar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tecto.2025.230902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) zone has consistently exhibited a sequence of westward-migrating earthquakes with magnitudes exceeding 7 (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>w</mi></mrow></msub><mo>></mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></math></span>) during its last three seismic cycles. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this behavior, we conducted multi-cycle simulations using a rate-and-state friction (RSF) model. The model incorporates three seismogenic asperities aligned along the fault strike, separated by barriers that inhibit rupture propagation. By simulating spontaneously occurring earthquakes, we analyzed variations in the timing of large events across the asperities. Our results indicate that both the strength and length of the barriers play a critical role in controlling the coupling between asperities, while variations in asperity length exert a relatively minor influence. Simulations with very weak barriers—permitting rupture jumps between asperities—and very strong barriers—limiting stress transfer—tended to produce synchronized earthquake cycles. In contrast, intermediate-strength barriers that allowed limited stress transfer generated more variable, non-synchronized cycles. These findings suggest that faults coupled primarily through static stress transfer are more prone to desynchronization, whereas those coupled via dynamic triggering or afterslip may maintain synchronization over multiple cycles. Although the model is simplified, it offers meaningful insights into the seismic behavior of the NAF and contributes to a deeper understanding of fault system dynamics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tectonophysics\",\"volume\":\"914 \",\"pages\":\"Article 230902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tectonophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195125002884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040195125002884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simulation of large earthquake synchronization and implications on North Anatolian fault zone
The North Anatolian Fault (NAF) zone has consistently exhibited a sequence of westward-migrating earthquakes with magnitudes exceeding 7 () during its last three seismic cycles. To investigate the mechanisms underlying this behavior, we conducted multi-cycle simulations using a rate-and-state friction (RSF) model. The model incorporates three seismogenic asperities aligned along the fault strike, separated by barriers that inhibit rupture propagation. By simulating spontaneously occurring earthquakes, we analyzed variations in the timing of large events across the asperities. Our results indicate that both the strength and length of the barriers play a critical role in controlling the coupling between asperities, while variations in asperity length exert a relatively minor influence. Simulations with very weak barriers—permitting rupture jumps between asperities—and very strong barriers—limiting stress transfer—tended to produce synchronized earthquake cycles. In contrast, intermediate-strength barriers that allowed limited stress transfer generated more variable, non-synchronized cycles. These findings suggest that faults coupled primarily through static stress transfer are more prone to desynchronization, whereas those coupled via dynamic triggering or afterslip may maintain synchronization over multiple cycles. Although the model is simplified, it offers meaningful insights into the seismic behavior of the NAF and contributes to a deeper understanding of fault system dynamics.
期刊介绍:
The prime focus of Tectonophysics will be high-impact original research and reviews in the fields of kinematics, structure, composition, and dynamics of the solid arth at all scales. Tectonophysics particularly encourages submission of papers based on the integration of a multitude of geophysical, geological, geochemical, geodynamic, and geotectonic methods