以氢乙醇混合物为助溶剂/悬浮介质的超临界CO2萃取植物生物活性物质。1. 红三叶草(Trifolium pratense L.)异黄酮提取工艺研究

IF 4.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Marco Antonio Mamani , Sebastián González , José Manuel del Valle , Zamantha Escobedo-Avellaneda , Gonzalo A. Núñez , Juan C. de la Fuente
{"title":"以氢乙醇混合物为助溶剂/悬浮介质的超临界CO2萃取植物生物活性物质。1. 红三叶草(Trifolium pratense L.)异黄酮提取工艺研究","authors":"Marco Antonio Mamani ,&nbsp;Sebastián González ,&nbsp;José Manuel del Valle ,&nbsp;Zamantha Escobedo-Avellaneda ,&nbsp;Gonzalo A. Núñez ,&nbsp;Juan C. de la Fuente","doi":"10.1016/j.supflu.2025.106766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the extraction of bioactive compounds from suspensions of finely disrupted red clover (<em>Trifolium pratense</em> L.) using SuperCritical (sc) CO<sub>2</sub> modified with hydroethanolic mixtures and compared the results with those obtained from a packed bed extraction. Total solids, phenolics, flavonoids, and isoflavones (formononetin and biochanin A) were quantified, together with the antioxidant activity of the extracts. A 30-min static extraction of hydroethanolic suspensions of red clover pressurized with CO<sub>2</sub> at 313 K or 323 K and from 20 MPa to 35 MPa, was followed by a 300-min dynamic extraction stage in which a solvent mixture with the same composition as the CO<sub>2</sub>-rich gaseous phase in the extraction vessel was continuously fed. The extraction of suspensions was pronouncedly more selective than a packed bed extraction using the same dynamic extraction solvent mixture for recovering phenolics (from (28−70) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> in suspension <em>versus</em> from (14−18) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> GAE/substrate in packed bed), total flavonoids (from (30−58) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> <em>versus</em> from (11−20) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> QE/substrate), and isoflavones (from (41−92) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> <em>versus</em> from (8.5–17) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> isoflavones/substrate). Despite these differences, the antioxidant activity (ORAC method) of the extracts was similar for both methods (from (32−33) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> in suspension <em>versus</em> from (29−40)x10<sup>−6</sup> mol·g<sup>−1</sup> TE /dry substrate in packed bed). The study identified water content in the liquid phase as the primary factor influencing extraction rate and yield. In conclusion, the extraction of bioactive compounds from red clover suspensions using scCO<sub>2</sub> modified with hydroethanolic mixtures demonstrated higher selectivity and yield compared to packed bed extraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supercritical Fluids","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 106766"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supercritical CO2 extraction of plant bioactives using hydroethanolic mixtures as cosolvent/suspension medium. 1. Case study on the extraction of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) isoflavones\",\"authors\":\"Marco Antonio Mamani ,&nbsp;Sebastián González ,&nbsp;José Manuel del Valle ,&nbsp;Zamantha Escobedo-Avellaneda ,&nbsp;Gonzalo A. Núñez ,&nbsp;Juan C. de la Fuente\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.supflu.2025.106766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated the extraction of bioactive compounds from suspensions of finely disrupted red clover (<em>Trifolium pratense</em> L.) using SuperCritical (sc) CO<sub>2</sub> modified with hydroethanolic mixtures and compared the results with those obtained from a packed bed extraction. Total solids, phenolics, flavonoids, and isoflavones (formononetin and biochanin A) were quantified, together with the antioxidant activity of the extracts. A 30-min static extraction of hydroethanolic suspensions of red clover pressurized with CO<sub>2</sub> at 313 K or 323 K and from 20 MPa to 35 MPa, was followed by a 300-min dynamic extraction stage in which a solvent mixture with the same composition as the CO<sub>2</sub>-rich gaseous phase in the extraction vessel was continuously fed. The extraction of suspensions was pronouncedly more selective than a packed bed extraction using the same dynamic extraction solvent mixture for recovering phenolics (from (28−70) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> in suspension <em>versus</em> from (14−18) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> GAE/substrate in packed bed), total flavonoids (from (30−58) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> <em>versus</em> from (11−20) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> QE/substrate), and isoflavones (from (41−92) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> <em>versus</em> from (8.5–17) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> isoflavones/substrate). Despite these differences, the antioxidant activity (ORAC method) of the extracts was similar for both methods (from (32−33) mg·g<sup>−1</sup> in suspension <em>versus</em> from (29−40)x10<sup>−6</sup> mol·g<sup>−1</sup> TE /dry substrate in packed bed). The study identified water content in the liquid phase as the primary factor influencing extraction rate and yield. In conclusion, the extraction of bioactive compounds from red clover suspensions using scCO<sub>2</sub> modified with hydroethanolic mixtures demonstrated higher selectivity and yield compared to packed bed extraction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supercritical Fluids\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supercritical Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896844625002530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supercritical Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896844625002530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究研究了用超临界(sc) CO2修饰的氢乙醇混合物从精细破碎的红三叶草(Trifolium pratense L.)悬浮液中提取生物活性化合物,并将结果与填充床提取的结果进行了比较。测定总固形物、酚类物质、黄酮类和异黄酮(刺芒柄花素和生物茶豆素A)含量,以及提取物的抗氧化活性。用313 K或323 K, 20 MPa至35 MPa的CO2加压的红三叶草氢乙醇悬浮液进行30分钟静态提取,随后是300分钟的动态萃取阶段,在此阶段中,连续向萃取容器中加入与富二氧化碳气相组成相同的溶剂混合物。对于回收酚类物质,使用相同的动态萃取溶剂混合物,悬浮液的萃取明显比填充床萃取更具选择性(从悬浮液(28−70)mg·g−1中提取,而从填充床中的(14−18)mg·g−1 GAE/底物中提取)。总黄酮(从(30 ~ 58)mg·g−1与(11 ~ 20)mg·g−1 QE/底物中提取)和异黄酮(从(41 ~ 92)mg·g−1与(8.5 ~ 17)mg·g−1异黄酮/底物中提取)。尽管存在这些差异,但两种方法的提取物的抗氧化活性(ORAC法)相似(从(32−33)mg·g−1悬浮液中提取与从(29−40)x10−6 mol·g−1 TE /干底物中提取)。研究确定液相含水量是影响提取率和得率的主要因素。综上所述,与填充床萃取相比,用氢乙醇混合物修饰的scCO2萃取红三叶草悬浮液中生物活性物质具有更高的选择性和收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supercritical CO2 extraction of plant bioactives using hydroethanolic mixtures as cosolvent/suspension medium. 1. Case study on the extraction of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) isoflavones
This study investigated the extraction of bioactive compounds from suspensions of finely disrupted red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) using SuperCritical (sc) CO2 modified with hydroethanolic mixtures and compared the results with those obtained from a packed bed extraction. Total solids, phenolics, flavonoids, and isoflavones (formononetin and biochanin A) were quantified, together with the antioxidant activity of the extracts. A 30-min static extraction of hydroethanolic suspensions of red clover pressurized with CO2 at 313 K or 323 K and from 20 MPa to 35 MPa, was followed by a 300-min dynamic extraction stage in which a solvent mixture with the same composition as the CO2-rich gaseous phase in the extraction vessel was continuously fed. The extraction of suspensions was pronouncedly more selective than a packed bed extraction using the same dynamic extraction solvent mixture for recovering phenolics (from (28−70) mg·g−1 in suspension versus from (14−18) mg·g−1 GAE/substrate in packed bed), total flavonoids (from (30−58) mg·g−1 versus from (11−20) mg·g−1 QE/substrate), and isoflavones (from (41−92) mg·g−1 versus from (8.5–17) mg·g−1 isoflavones/substrate). Despite these differences, the antioxidant activity (ORAC method) of the extracts was similar for both methods (from (32−33) mg·g−1 in suspension versus from (29−40)x10−6 mol·g−1 TE /dry substrate in packed bed). The study identified water content in the liquid phase as the primary factor influencing extraction rate and yield. In conclusion, the extraction of bioactive compounds from red clover suspensions using scCO2 modified with hydroethanolic mixtures demonstrated higher selectivity and yield compared to packed bed extraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Supercritical Fluids
Journal of Supercritical Fluids 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
236
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Supercritical Fluids is an international journal devoted to the fundamental and applied aspects of supercritical fluids and processes. Its aim is to provide a focused platform for academic and industrial researchers to report their findings and to have ready access to the advances in this rapidly growing field. Its coverage is multidisciplinary and includes both basic and applied topics. Thermodynamics and phase equilibria, reaction kinetics and rate processes, thermal and transport properties, and all topics related to processing such as separations (extraction, fractionation, purification, chromatography) nucleation and impregnation are within the scope. Accounts of specific engineering applications such as those encountered in food, fuel, natural products, minerals, pharmaceuticals and polymer industries are included. Topics related to high pressure equipment design, analytical techniques, sensors, and process control methodologies are also within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信