Xinyu Zhang , Shouhong Zhang , Fan Zhang , Jingyi Shi , Jingqiu Chen
{"title":"在土壤保持中,降雨量决定了土壤侵蚀和植被保护的效果","authors":"Xinyu Zhang , Shouhong Zhang , Fan Zhang , Jingyi Shi , Jingqiu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rainfall is a primary driving force of soil and water loss. However, the impacts of increasing rainfall amount (RA) on slope soil erosion are obscure, calling for a detailed integrated assessment. In particular, the relationship between dynamic RA and vegetation protection effectiveness remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study conducted a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 40 studies, representing 1,630 rainfall events and the associated runoff (R) and soil loss (S), collected from runoff plots across various regions of China up to the year 2023. Among these, 68.59% of the rainfall events occurred in the northern rocky mountainous region and the Loess Plateau, while 72.58% were recorded on Semi-alfisols and Amorphic soil. The runoff plots included grassland, shrubland, forest, and bare land, with RA ranging from light rain to downpours. The results indicated that increasing RA significantly promoted soil erosion and increased the slope erosion sensitivity. The weighted average runoff (WR) and the weighted average soil loss (WS) produced by downpours reached 12.06 and 11.16 times those produced by light to moderate rain, respectively. The weighted average runoff coefficient (WRC) increased from 0.24 to 0.41 as RA rose, while the weighted average sediment coefficient (WSC) from torrential rain to downpours was higher than from light to heavy rain. The vegetation protection effectiveness was influenced by both vegetation type and RA. Vegetation was more effective in controlling S than R. The effectiveness of vegetation in reducing runoff declined with increasing RA. Its ability to reduce erosion initially decreased and then increased dfrom light to torrential rain. Forest significantly reduced soil erosion and inhibited the linear relationship between ‘ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)’. Additionally, this study presents a rainfall event classification based on soil loss tolerance and emphasizes that vegetation protection effectiveness is not equivalent to soil loss tolerance, thereby providing scientific support for regional soil and water conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134219"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rainfall amount shapes the soil erosion and vegetation protection effectiveness in soil conservation\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Zhang , Shouhong Zhang , Fan Zhang , Jingyi Shi , Jingqiu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Rainfall is a primary driving force of soil and water loss. However, the impacts of increasing rainfall amount (RA) on slope soil erosion are obscure, calling for a detailed integrated assessment. In particular, the relationship between dynamic RA and vegetation protection effectiveness remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study conducted a <em>meta</em>-analysis of 40 studies, representing 1,630 rainfall events and the associated runoff (R) and soil loss (S), collected from runoff plots across various regions of China up to the year 2023. Among these, 68.59% of the rainfall events occurred in the northern rocky mountainous region and the Loess Plateau, while 72.58% were recorded on Semi-alfisols and Amorphic soil. The runoff plots included grassland, shrubland, forest, and bare land, with RA ranging from light rain to downpours. The results indicated that increasing RA significantly promoted soil erosion and increased the slope erosion sensitivity. The weighted average runoff (WR) and the weighted average soil loss (WS) produced by downpours reached 12.06 and 11.16 times those produced by light to moderate rain, respectively. The weighted average runoff coefficient (WRC) increased from 0.24 to 0.41 as RA rose, while the weighted average sediment coefficient (WSC) from torrential rain to downpours was higher than from light to heavy rain. The vegetation protection effectiveness was influenced by both vegetation type and RA. Vegetation was more effective in controlling S than R. The effectiveness of vegetation in reducing runoff declined with increasing RA. Its ability to reduce erosion initially decreased and then increased dfrom light to torrential rain. Forest significantly reduced soil erosion and inhibited the linear relationship between ‘ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)’. Additionally, this study presents a rainfall event classification based on soil loss tolerance and emphasizes that vegetation protection effectiveness is not equivalent to soil loss tolerance, thereby providing scientific support for regional soil and water conservation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"663 \",\"pages\":\"Article 134219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015574\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425015574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rainfall amount shapes the soil erosion and vegetation protection effectiveness in soil conservation
Rainfall is a primary driving force of soil and water loss. However, the impacts of increasing rainfall amount (RA) on slope soil erosion are obscure, calling for a detailed integrated assessment. In particular, the relationship between dynamic RA and vegetation protection effectiveness remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study conducted a meta-analysis of 40 studies, representing 1,630 rainfall events and the associated runoff (R) and soil loss (S), collected from runoff plots across various regions of China up to the year 2023. Among these, 68.59% of the rainfall events occurred in the northern rocky mountainous region and the Loess Plateau, while 72.58% were recorded on Semi-alfisols and Amorphic soil. The runoff plots included grassland, shrubland, forest, and bare land, with RA ranging from light rain to downpours. The results indicated that increasing RA significantly promoted soil erosion and increased the slope erosion sensitivity. The weighted average runoff (WR) and the weighted average soil loss (WS) produced by downpours reached 12.06 and 11.16 times those produced by light to moderate rain, respectively. The weighted average runoff coefficient (WRC) increased from 0.24 to 0.41 as RA rose, while the weighted average sediment coefficient (WSC) from torrential rain to downpours was higher than from light to heavy rain. The vegetation protection effectiveness was influenced by both vegetation type and RA. Vegetation was more effective in controlling S than R. The effectiveness of vegetation in reducing runoff declined with increasing RA. Its ability to reduce erosion initially decreased and then increased dfrom light to torrential rain. Forest significantly reduced soil erosion and inhibited the linear relationship between ‘ln(RA)-ln(R)-ln(S)’. Additionally, this study presents a rainfall event classification based on soil loss tolerance and emphasizes that vegetation protection effectiveness is not equivalent to soil loss tolerance, thereby providing scientific support for regional soil and water conservation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.