钠离子和锂离子电池大气调节热失控特性及多维安全评价

IF 17 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zhixiang Cheng, Zhiyuan Li, Yuxuan Li, Yin Yu, Chaoshi Liu, Zhenwei Wu, Peiyu Duan, Huang Li, Wenxin Mei, Qingsong Wang
{"title":"钠离子和锂离子电池大气调节热失控特性及多维安全评价","authors":"Zhixiang Cheng,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Li,&nbsp;Yuxuan Li,&nbsp;Yin Yu,&nbsp;Chaoshi Liu,&nbsp;Zhenwei Wu,&nbsp;Peiyu Duan,&nbsp;Huang Li,&nbsp;Wenxin Mei,&nbsp;Qingsong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.etran.2025.100475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding and quantifying the thermal runaway behavior of emerging battery chemistries is essential for ensuring safety in real-world applications. This study systematically investigates the thermal runaway characteristics of sodium-ion (SIB) and lithium-ion (LIB) batteries of comparable volumes under both air and inert gas environments. Experimental results show that under low-oxygen conditions, SIB and nickel–cobalt–manganese (NCM) cells exhibit substantial mitigation of thermal runaway severity, including over 35 % decrease in gas generation metrics, while lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells remain largely unaffected. In gas composition analysis, NCM cells show significant decreases in CO<sub>2</sub>/CO and O<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> ratios, whereas SIB and LFP display no notable compositional changes. Based on experimental data and literature, a multidimensional database of thermal runaway parameters is developed, incorporating metrics such as gas explosiveness, toxicity, and heat of combustion. Three classical multi-criteria evaluation methods—Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Principal Component Analysis, and a median-based approach—are applied and compared. To address limitations arising from dimensional and variance scale differences among parameters, an expected contribution method is proposed to enable balanced and consistent scoring. Results demonstrate that this method enhances fairness and interpretability, particularly in scenarios with substantial scale disparities among variables arising from cross-battery systems. This work establishes a quantitative safety assessment framework that enables cross-platform comparisons and provides guidance for battery system design, risk zoning, and thermal mitigation strategies. The framework is broadly applicable to emerging battery chemistries and advances battery safety evaluation across diverse application environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36355,"journal":{"name":"Etransportation","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100475"},"PeriodicalIF":17.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atmosphere-regulated thermal runaway characteristics and multidimensional safety assessment of sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries\",\"authors\":\"Zhixiang Cheng,&nbsp;Zhiyuan Li,&nbsp;Yuxuan Li,&nbsp;Yin Yu,&nbsp;Chaoshi Liu,&nbsp;Zhenwei Wu,&nbsp;Peiyu Duan,&nbsp;Huang Li,&nbsp;Wenxin Mei,&nbsp;Qingsong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etran.2025.100475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding and quantifying the thermal runaway behavior of emerging battery chemistries is essential for ensuring safety in real-world applications. This study systematically investigates the thermal runaway characteristics of sodium-ion (SIB) and lithium-ion (LIB) batteries of comparable volumes under both air and inert gas environments. Experimental results show that under low-oxygen conditions, SIB and nickel–cobalt–manganese (NCM) cells exhibit substantial mitigation of thermal runaway severity, including over 35 % decrease in gas generation metrics, while lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells remain largely unaffected. In gas composition analysis, NCM cells show significant decreases in CO<sub>2</sub>/CO and O<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> ratios, whereas SIB and LFP display no notable compositional changes. Based on experimental data and literature, a multidimensional database of thermal runaway parameters is developed, incorporating metrics such as gas explosiveness, toxicity, and heat of combustion. Three classical multi-criteria evaluation methods—Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Principal Component Analysis, and a median-based approach—are applied and compared. To address limitations arising from dimensional and variance scale differences among parameters, an expected contribution method is proposed to enable balanced and consistent scoring. Results demonstrate that this method enhances fairness and interpretability, particularly in scenarios with substantial scale disparities among variables arising from cross-battery systems. This work establishes a quantitative safety assessment framework that enables cross-platform comparisons and provides guidance for battery system design, risk zoning, and thermal mitigation strategies. The framework is broadly applicable to emerging battery chemistries and advances battery safety evaluation across diverse application environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etransportation\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etransportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116825000827\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etransportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590116825000827","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理解和量化新兴电池化学物质的热失控行为对于确保实际应用中的安全性至关重要。本研究系统地研究了同等体积的钠离子(SIB)和锂离子(LIB)电池在空气和惰性气体环境下的热失控特性。实验结果表明,在低氧条件下,SIB和镍钴锰(NCM)电池的热失控严重程度得到了显著缓解,其中产气指标降低了35%以上,而磷酸铁锂(LFP)电池在很大程度上不受影响。在气体成分分析中,NCM细胞的CO2/CO和O2/N2比例显著降低,而SIB和LFP细胞的成分没有显著变化。基于实验数据和文献,开发了一个多维热失控参数数据库,包括气体爆炸性、毒性和燃烧热等指标。应用并比较了三种经典的多准则评价方法——理想解相似性排序偏好法、主成分分析法和基于中值法。为了解决参数之间的维度和方差尺度差异所带来的限制,提出了一种期望贡献方法,以实现平衡和一致的评分。结果表明,该方法增强了公平性和可解释性,特别是在跨电池系统产生的变量之间存在巨大规模差异的情况下。这项工作建立了一个定量的安全评估框架,可以进行跨平台比较,并为电池系统设计、风险分区和热缓解策略提供指导。该框架广泛适用于新兴的电池化学物质,并在不同的应用环境中推进电池安全评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atmosphere-regulated thermal runaway characteristics and multidimensional safety assessment of sodium-ion and lithium-ion batteries
Understanding and quantifying the thermal runaway behavior of emerging battery chemistries is essential for ensuring safety in real-world applications. This study systematically investigates the thermal runaway characteristics of sodium-ion (SIB) and lithium-ion (LIB) batteries of comparable volumes under both air and inert gas environments. Experimental results show that under low-oxygen conditions, SIB and nickel–cobalt–manganese (NCM) cells exhibit substantial mitigation of thermal runaway severity, including over 35 % decrease in gas generation metrics, while lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cells remain largely unaffected. In gas composition analysis, NCM cells show significant decreases in CO2/CO and O2/N2 ratios, whereas SIB and LFP display no notable compositional changes. Based on experimental data and literature, a multidimensional database of thermal runaway parameters is developed, incorporating metrics such as gas explosiveness, toxicity, and heat of combustion. Three classical multi-criteria evaluation methods—Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, Principal Component Analysis, and a median-based approach—are applied and compared. To address limitations arising from dimensional and variance scale differences among parameters, an expected contribution method is proposed to enable balanced and consistent scoring. Results demonstrate that this method enhances fairness and interpretability, particularly in scenarios with substantial scale disparities among variables arising from cross-battery systems. This work establishes a quantitative safety assessment framework that enables cross-platform comparisons and provides guidance for battery system design, risk zoning, and thermal mitigation strategies. The framework is broadly applicable to emerging battery chemistries and advances battery safety evaluation across diverse application environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etransportation
Etransportation Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
12.60%
发文量
57
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: eTransportation is a scholarly journal that aims to advance knowledge in the field of electric transportation. It focuses on all modes of transportation that utilize electricity as their primary source of energy, including electric vehicles, trains, ships, and aircraft. The journal covers all stages of research, development, and testing of new technologies, systems, and devices related to electrical transportation. The journal welcomes the use of simulation and analysis tools at the system, transport, or device level. Its primary emphasis is on the study of the electrical and electronic aspects of transportation systems. However, it also considers research on mechanical parts or subsystems of vehicles if there is a clear interaction with electrical or electronic equipment. Please note that this journal excludes other aspects such as sociological, political, regulatory, or environmental factors from its scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信