与常规泥浆相比,酸化泥浆减少了微生物和土壤有机质的注入

IF 5 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Yusra Zireeni , Robert W. Brown , Davey L. Jones , David R. Chadwick
{"title":"与常规泥浆相比,酸化泥浆减少了微生物和土壤有机质的注入","authors":"Yusra Zireeni ,&nbsp;Robert W. Brown ,&nbsp;Davey L. Jones ,&nbsp;David R. Chadwick","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intensive agricultural practices typically lead to a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). Consequently, there is a need to develop more sustainable management strategies that promote greater carbon (C) storage in soil. Slurry application is a management option often used to maintain soil organic matter (SOM) stocks and recycle and replenish nutrients essential for crop growth. Slurry acidification with sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) is a method known to enhance slurry nitrogen (N) retention (through reduced ammonia emissions), however, its broader impacts on SOC turnover are less well understood. This study assessed the priming effect of applications of conventional cattle slurry (pH 6.90 ± 0.06, <em>n</em> = 3) and acidified cattle slurry (pH 5.5) on three distinct soil C pools; <sup>14</sup>C-labelled microbial biomass (apparent priming), fresh particulate organic matter (POC; <sup>14</sup>C-labelled fresh grass crop residues; GCR) and <sup>14</sup>C-labelled quasi-stable SOM (real priming) in a series of laboratory assays, over 6 months. All slurry treatments resulted in positive priming compared to the control (no treatment). The results indicated that slurry acidification reduced the real and apparent priming effects, relative to conventional slurry application, by 7.9 % and 11.3 %, respectively. Acidified slurry application also increased mineralisation of fresh GCR inputs promoting decomposition and nutrient release. In all pools, the effect of slurry addition was short-lived, lasting no more than six months. This suggests that applying acidified slurry may reduce C losses, potentially enhancing soil quality compared to conventional slurry, while also offering the added benefits of reduced N losses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 106457"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acidified slurry reduces microbial and soil organic matter priming compared to conventional slurry\",\"authors\":\"Yusra Zireeni ,&nbsp;Robert W. Brown ,&nbsp;Davey L. Jones ,&nbsp;David R. Chadwick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intensive agricultural practices typically lead to a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). Consequently, there is a need to develop more sustainable management strategies that promote greater carbon (C) storage in soil. Slurry application is a management option often used to maintain soil organic matter (SOM) stocks and recycle and replenish nutrients essential for crop growth. Slurry acidification with sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) is a method known to enhance slurry nitrogen (N) retention (through reduced ammonia emissions), however, its broader impacts on SOC turnover are less well understood. This study assessed the priming effect of applications of conventional cattle slurry (pH 6.90 ± 0.06, <em>n</em> = 3) and acidified cattle slurry (pH 5.5) on three distinct soil C pools; <sup>14</sup>C-labelled microbial biomass (apparent priming), fresh particulate organic matter (POC; <sup>14</sup>C-labelled fresh grass crop residues; GCR) and <sup>14</sup>C-labelled quasi-stable SOM (real priming) in a series of laboratory assays, over 6 months. All slurry treatments resulted in positive priming compared to the control (no treatment). The results indicated that slurry acidification reduced the real and apparent priming effects, relative to conventional slurry application, by 7.9 % and 11.3 %, respectively. Acidified slurry application also increased mineralisation of fresh GCR inputs promoting decomposition and nutrient release. In all pools, the effect of slurry addition was short-lived, lasting no more than six months. This suggests that applying acidified slurry may reduce C losses, potentially enhancing soil quality compared to conventional slurry, while also offering the added benefits of reduced N losses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325005955\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325005955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

集约化农业实践通常会导致土壤有机碳(SOC)的损失。因此,有必要制定更可持续的管理战略,促进土壤中更多的碳(C)储存。泥浆施用是一种管理选择,通常用于保持土壤有机质(SOM)库存,循环和补充作物生长所必需的养分。用硫酸(H2SO4)酸化浆料是一种已知的提高浆料氮(N)潴留(通过减少氨排放)的方法,然而,其对有机碳周转的广泛影响尚不清楚。本研究评估了常规牛浆(pH为6.90±0.06,n = 3)和酸化牛浆(pH为5.5)对3个不同土壤C库的启动效应;14c标记的微生物生物量(表观启动),新鲜颗粒有机物质(POC; 14c标记的新鲜牧草作物残留物;GCR)和14c标记的准稳定SOM(真实启动)的一系列实验室分析,超过6个月。与对照组(未处理)相比,所有泥浆处理都产生了正启动。结果表明,与常规泥浆施用相比,泥浆酸化降低了实际和明显的启动效应,分别降低了7.9%和11.3%。酸化浆的施用也增加了新鲜GCR投入物的矿化,促进了分解和养分释放。在所有水池中,添加浆液的效果都是短暂的,持续时间不超过6个月。这表明施用酸化泥浆可以减少碳损失,与常规泥浆相比,有可能提高土壤质量,同时还提供减少氮损失的额外好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acidified slurry reduces microbial and soil organic matter priming compared to conventional slurry
Intensive agricultural practices typically lead to a loss of soil organic carbon (SOC). Consequently, there is a need to develop more sustainable management strategies that promote greater carbon (C) storage in soil. Slurry application is a management option often used to maintain soil organic matter (SOM) stocks and recycle and replenish nutrients essential for crop growth. Slurry acidification with sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is a method known to enhance slurry nitrogen (N) retention (through reduced ammonia emissions), however, its broader impacts on SOC turnover are less well understood. This study assessed the priming effect of applications of conventional cattle slurry (pH 6.90 ± 0.06, n = 3) and acidified cattle slurry (pH 5.5) on three distinct soil C pools; 14C-labelled microbial biomass (apparent priming), fresh particulate organic matter (POC; 14C-labelled fresh grass crop residues; GCR) and 14C-labelled quasi-stable SOM (real priming) in a series of laboratory assays, over 6 months. All slurry treatments resulted in positive priming compared to the control (no treatment). The results indicated that slurry acidification reduced the real and apparent priming effects, relative to conventional slurry application, by 7.9 % and 11.3 %, respectively. Acidified slurry application also increased mineralisation of fresh GCR inputs promoting decomposition and nutrient release. In all pools, the effect of slurry addition was short-lived, lasting no more than six months. This suggests that applying acidified slurry may reduce C losses, potentially enhancing soil quality compared to conventional slurry, while also offering the added benefits of reduced N losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信