业主接近度与包裹级洪水暴露之间的关系:来自内布拉斯加州道格拉斯县的证据

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jesse Andrews , Jiyoung Lee , Jenny B. Mason , Yunwoo Nam , Zhenghong Tang
{"title":"业主接近度与包裹级洪水暴露之间的关系:来自内布拉斯加州道格拉斯县的证据","authors":"Jesse Andrews ,&nbsp;Jiyoung Lee ,&nbsp;Jenny B. Mason ,&nbsp;Yunwoo Nam ,&nbsp;Zhenghong Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study we examine how owner–parcel proximity is associated with parcel-scale flood exposure in Douglas County, Nebraska. We measure exposure and estimate logistic and spatial regression models that distinguish single-family residential (SFR) from multi-family residential (MFR) parcels while adjusting for assessed value, parcel area, structure age, and building presence. For SFR parcels, exposure rises with distance: out-of-state SFR holdings have 3.66 % SFHA exposure versus 0.69 % for owner-occupied SFR parcels and 2019 inundation rates of 3.15 % versus 0.31 %. Treating proximity continuously among non-occupant SFR parcels yields a per-log-kilometer odds ratio of 1.32 for SFHA exposure (95 % CI: 1.31–1.34); collapsing distances ≤10 km to a local category change this to 1.25 (95 % CI: 1.23–1.28), an approximately 5 % attenuation that leaves inference unchanged. Results are robust across distance encodings, and administrative proximity bands show moderate ordinal alignment with kilometer bins. Distance is not a consistent correlate of regulatory exposure for MFR parcels, and no MFR parcels met the 2019 inundation criterion. Descriptively, unimproved non-occupant holdings record the highest event rates, indicating that development status and distance jointly concentrate exposure. Collectively, the findings should motivate proximity aware policy including renter-focused flood-risk disclosures, portfolio-level transparency in rental registries, and targeted buyouts or incentives for distant owners of unimproved SFR parcels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 105795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between owner proximity and parcel-level flood exposure: Evidence from Douglas County, Nebraska\",\"authors\":\"Jesse Andrews ,&nbsp;Jiyoung Lee ,&nbsp;Jenny B. Mason ,&nbsp;Yunwoo Nam ,&nbsp;Zhenghong Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study we examine how owner–parcel proximity is associated with parcel-scale flood exposure in Douglas County, Nebraska. We measure exposure and estimate logistic and spatial regression models that distinguish single-family residential (SFR) from multi-family residential (MFR) parcels while adjusting for assessed value, parcel area, structure age, and building presence. For SFR parcels, exposure rises with distance: out-of-state SFR holdings have 3.66 % SFHA exposure versus 0.69 % for owner-occupied SFR parcels and 2019 inundation rates of 3.15 % versus 0.31 %. Treating proximity continuously among non-occupant SFR parcels yields a per-log-kilometer odds ratio of 1.32 for SFHA exposure (95 % CI: 1.31–1.34); collapsing distances ≤10 km to a local category change this to 1.25 (95 % CI: 1.23–1.28), an approximately 5 % attenuation that leaves inference unchanged. Results are robust across distance encodings, and administrative proximity bands show moderate ordinal alignment with kilometer bins. Distance is not a consistent correlate of regulatory exposure for MFR parcels, and no MFR parcels met the 2019 inundation criterion. Descriptively, unimproved non-occupant holdings record the highest event rates, indicating that development status and distance jointly concentrate exposure. Collectively, the findings should motivate proximity aware policy including renter-focused flood-risk disclosures, portfolio-level transparency in rental registries, and targeted buyouts or incentives for distant owners of unimproved SFR parcels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006193\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925006193","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了内布拉斯加州道格拉斯县业主-地块接近度与地块规模洪水暴露的关系。我们测量暴露并估计区分单户住宅(SFR)和多户住宅(MFR)地块的逻辑和空间回归模型,同时调整评估价值、地块面积、结构年龄和建筑存在。对于SFR地块,风险敞口随着距离的增加而增加:州外SFR持有的SFHA风险敞口为3.66%,而自住SFR地块为0.69%,2019年的淹没率为3.15%,而自住SFR地块为0.31%。在无居民的sffr地块中连续处理邻近区域,SFHA暴露的每对数公里优势比为1.32 (95% CI: 1.31-1.34);到局部类别≤10公里的坍缩距离将其更改为1.25 (95% CI: 1.23-1.28),约5%的衰减使推理保持不变。结果具有跨距离编码的鲁棒性,并且行政接近带与公里箱显示适度的顺序对准。距离与MFR地块监管暴露的相关性并不一致,没有MFR地块符合2019年的淹没标准。描述性地说,未改善的非居住者持有记录了最高的事件发生率,表明发展状况和距离共同集中暴露。总的来说,研究结果应该激发邻近意识政策,包括以租户为中心的洪水风险披露、租赁登记的投资组合级别透明度,以及对未改善的SFR地块的远程所有者的有针对性的收购或激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between owner proximity and parcel-level flood exposure: Evidence from Douglas County, Nebraska
In this study we examine how owner–parcel proximity is associated with parcel-scale flood exposure in Douglas County, Nebraska. We measure exposure and estimate logistic and spatial regression models that distinguish single-family residential (SFR) from multi-family residential (MFR) parcels while adjusting for assessed value, parcel area, structure age, and building presence. For SFR parcels, exposure rises with distance: out-of-state SFR holdings have 3.66 % SFHA exposure versus 0.69 % for owner-occupied SFR parcels and 2019 inundation rates of 3.15 % versus 0.31 %. Treating proximity continuously among non-occupant SFR parcels yields a per-log-kilometer odds ratio of 1.32 for SFHA exposure (95 % CI: 1.31–1.34); collapsing distances ≤10 km to a local category change this to 1.25 (95 % CI: 1.23–1.28), an approximately 5 % attenuation that leaves inference unchanged. Results are robust across distance encodings, and administrative proximity bands show moderate ordinal alignment with kilometer bins. Distance is not a consistent correlate of regulatory exposure for MFR parcels, and no MFR parcels met the 2019 inundation criterion. Descriptively, unimproved non-occupant holdings record the highest event rates, indicating that development status and distance jointly concentrate exposure. Collectively, the findings should motivate proximity aware policy including renter-focused flood-risk disclosures, portfolio-level transparency in rental registries, and targeted buyouts or incentives for distant owners of unimproved SFR parcels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信