饲料原料的生化组成对马体外胃生态系统活性的影响

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Samy Julliand , Véronique Julliand , Pauline Grimm
{"title":"饲料原料的生化组成对马体外胃生态系统活性的影响","authors":"Samy Julliand ,&nbsp;Véronique Julliand ,&nbsp;Pauline Grimm","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When the pH of the gastric environment decreases below 4, acidity and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) can damage the epithelium. Depending on the feed ingredients incorporated in horse feeds, gastric ecosystem can be modified. Dehydrated alfalfa might be of interest because of its biochemical composition, which provides a strong acid buffering capacity. We ran an <em>in vitro</em> trial to assess the impact of three dehydrated alfalfas differing in biochemical composition on the persistence of acid buffering capacity over time in a gastric ecosystem undergoing fermentation. Barley and wheat bran were used for comparison.</div><div>Five substrates were prepared from 0.5 g dry matter (DM) barley, completed with 0.5 g DM alfalfa, wheat bran, or barley. Substrates were added to a modified Lowe culture medium in bottles under sterile conditions. After inoculation with gastric contents collected from horses, the bottles were incubated anaerobically for 10-hours. Every two hours, the gas produced, the concentration of VFAs and lactate, the pH, and the amount of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) required to decrease the pH of the solution down to 4 were measured in triplicate.</div><div>The pH of the feed ingredients was close (5.81 −6.29), but 7 −12 times more HCl was needed to bring the pH down to 4 with alfalfa compared to barley, and 3 −5 times more compared to wheat bran. This acid buffering capacity was correlated with ash content (r = 0.984; P = 0.002), and particularly calcium content (r = 0.995; P &lt; 0.001). Fermentations started faster in bottles containing alfalfa (P &lt; 0.001 after 2 h), but then gas production was higher with barley and wheat bran (P &lt; 0.001). However, VFA concentrations remained higher with alfalfa than other substrates (P &lt; 0.05), and the higher the content in proteins and simple sugars the more pronounced the differences. While the pH of the solution and the amount of HCl required to decrease to pH4 fell sharply over the 10-hour monitoring period, these variables remained higher with alfalfa compared to barley and wheat bran substrates (P &lt; 0.001 after 6-hours for pH; P &lt; 0.05 after 4-hours for HCl amount). Despite their different biochemical composition, the impact of the three alfalfas in the environment was close. These results suggest that adding alfalfa to feeds could contribute maintaining a higher pH in the horse stomach. This seems to arise from intrinsic high acid buffering capacity of alfalfa, rather than from the reduction in gastric fermentations. Considering the acid buffering capacity of feed ingredients in the formulation of horse feed could help maintain a physiological gastric pH for longer and reduce gastric diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"329 ","pages":"Article 116494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biochemical composition of feed ingredients influences equine gastric ecosystem activity in vitro\",\"authors\":\"Samy Julliand ,&nbsp;Véronique Julliand ,&nbsp;Pauline Grimm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>When the pH of the gastric environment decreases below 4, acidity and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) can damage the epithelium. Depending on the feed ingredients incorporated in horse feeds, gastric ecosystem can be modified. Dehydrated alfalfa might be of interest because of its biochemical composition, which provides a strong acid buffering capacity. We ran an <em>in vitro</em> trial to assess the impact of three dehydrated alfalfas differing in biochemical composition on the persistence of acid buffering capacity over time in a gastric ecosystem undergoing fermentation. Barley and wheat bran were used for comparison.</div><div>Five substrates were prepared from 0.5 g dry matter (DM) barley, completed with 0.5 g DM alfalfa, wheat bran, or barley. Substrates were added to a modified Lowe culture medium in bottles under sterile conditions. After inoculation with gastric contents collected from horses, the bottles were incubated anaerobically for 10-hours. Every two hours, the gas produced, the concentration of VFAs and lactate, the pH, and the amount of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) required to decrease the pH of the solution down to 4 were measured in triplicate.</div><div>The pH of the feed ingredients was close (5.81 −6.29), but 7 −12 times more HCl was needed to bring the pH down to 4 with alfalfa compared to barley, and 3 −5 times more compared to wheat bran. This acid buffering capacity was correlated with ash content (r = 0.984; P = 0.002), and particularly calcium content (r = 0.995; P &lt; 0.001). Fermentations started faster in bottles containing alfalfa (P &lt; 0.001 after 2 h), but then gas production was higher with barley and wheat bran (P &lt; 0.001). However, VFA concentrations remained higher with alfalfa than other substrates (P &lt; 0.05), and the higher the content in proteins and simple sugars the more pronounced the differences. While the pH of the solution and the amount of HCl required to decrease to pH4 fell sharply over the 10-hour monitoring period, these variables remained higher with alfalfa compared to barley and wheat bran substrates (P &lt; 0.001 after 6-hours for pH; P &lt; 0.05 after 4-hours for HCl amount). Despite their different biochemical composition, the impact of the three alfalfas in the environment was close. These results suggest that adding alfalfa to feeds could contribute maintaining a higher pH in the horse stomach. This seems to arise from intrinsic high acid buffering capacity of alfalfa, rather than from the reduction in gastric fermentations. Considering the acid buffering capacity of feed ingredients in the formulation of horse feed could help maintain a physiological gastric pH for longer and reduce gastric diseases.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"329 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002895\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125002895","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当胃环境pH值低于4时,胃酸和挥发性脂肪酸(VFAs)可损伤上皮。根据马饲料中添加的饲料成分,可以对胃生态系统进行改造。脱水苜蓿可能会引起人们的兴趣,因为它的生化成分,提供了很强的酸缓冲能力。我们进行了一项体外试验,以评估三种不同生化成分的脱水苜蓿对胃生态系统发酵过程中酸缓冲能力随时间持续的影响。以大麦和麦麸为对照。从0.5 g干物质(DM)大麦中制备5种底物,再加入0.5 g干物质(DM)苜蓿、麦麸或大麦。在无菌条件下,将底物加入改良的Lowe培养基中。用从马身上收集的胃内容物接种后,对瓶子进行厌氧培养10小时。每隔两小时,测量产生的气体,VFAs和乳酸的浓度,pH值,以及将溶液的pH值降低到4所需的0.1 M盐酸(HCl)的量,一式三次。饲料原料pH值相近(5.81 −6.29),但要使pH值降至4,紫花苜蓿所需的HCl为大麦的7 −12倍,麦麸所需的HCl为3 −5倍。酸缓冲能力与灰分含量相关(r = 0.984;P = 0.002),尤其是钙含量(r = 0.995;P <; 0.001)。2 h后,含有苜蓿的瓶子发酵开始得更快(P <; 0.001),但随后大麦和麦麸的产气量更高(P <; 0.001)。苜蓿中VFA含量高于其他底物(P <; 0.05),且蛋白质和单糖含量越高,差异越显著。虽然在10小时的监测期间,溶液的pH值和降至pH4所需的HCl量急剧下降,但与大麦和麦麸基质相比,苜蓿基质的这些变量仍然较高(pH值为6小时后P <; 0.001;HCl量为4小时后P <; 0.05)。尽管三种苜蓿的生化成分不同,但它们对环境的影响是相近的。这些结果表明,在饲料中添加苜蓿有助于维持马胃中较高的pH值。这似乎是由于紫花苜蓿固有的高酸缓冲能力,而不是由于胃发酵的减少。在马饲料配方中考虑饲料成分的酸缓冲能力,有助于延长维持胃生理pH值的时间,减少胃疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biochemical composition of feed ingredients influences equine gastric ecosystem activity in vitro
When the pH of the gastric environment decreases below 4, acidity and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) can damage the epithelium. Depending on the feed ingredients incorporated in horse feeds, gastric ecosystem can be modified. Dehydrated alfalfa might be of interest because of its biochemical composition, which provides a strong acid buffering capacity. We ran an in vitro trial to assess the impact of three dehydrated alfalfas differing in biochemical composition on the persistence of acid buffering capacity over time in a gastric ecosystem undergoing fermentation. Barley and wheat bran were used for comparison.
Five substrates were prepared from 0.5 g dry matter (DM) barley, completed with 0.5 g DM alfalfa, wheat bran, or barley. Substrates were added to a modified Lowe culture medium in bottles under sterile conditions. After inoculation with gastric contents collected from horses, the bottles were incubated anaerobically for 10-hours. Every two hours, the gas produced, the concentration of VFAs and lactate, the pH, and the amount of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) required to decrease the pH of the solution down to 4 were measured in triplicate.
The pH of the feed ingredients was close (5.81 −6.29), but 7 −12 times more HCl was needed to bring the pH down to 4 with alfalfa compared to barley, and 3 −5 times more compared to wheat bran. This acid buffering capacity was correlated with ash content (r = 0.984; P = 0.002), and particularly calcium content (r = 0.995; P < 0.001). Fermentations started faster in bottles containing alfalfa (P < 0.001 after 2 h), but then gas production was higher with barley and wheat bran (P < 0.001). However, VFA concentrations remained higher with alfalfa than other substrates (P < 0.05), and the higher the content in proteins and simple sugars the more pronounced the differences. While the pH of the solution and the amount of HCl required to decrease to pH4 fell sharply over the 10-hour monitoring period, these variables remained higher with alfalfa compared to barley and wheat bran substrates (P < 0.001 after 6-hours for pH; P < 0.05 after 4-hours for HCl amount). Despite their different biochemical composition, the impact of the three alfalfas in the environment was close. These results suggest that adding alfalfa to feeds could contribute maintaining a higher pH in the horse stomach. This seems to arise from intrinsic high acid buffering capacity of alfalfa, rather than from the reduction in gastric fermentations. Considering the acid buffering capacity of feed ingredients in the formulation of horse feed could help maintain a physiological gastric pH for longer and reduce gastric diseases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信