智能微电网中可再生能源投资与日常能源采购的联合决策

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tian Wang , Yangyang Liang , Yongjing Zhang
{"title":"智能微电网中可再生能源投资与日常能源采购的联合决策","authors":"Tian Wang ,&nbsp;Yangyang Liang ,&nbsp;Yongjing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the joint decision-making problem of renewable energy investment and daily electricity procurement within smart microgrids. By considering time-of-use pricing, demand shifting, and the intermittent nature of renewable energy, we develop a two-stage optimization model: the first stage uses a quadratic investment cost function to determine renewable energy capacity, while the second stage adopts a stochastic decision-making approach based on two-point probability distributions to manage traditional energy procurement under uncertain renewable output. Our findings indicate that higher nighttime electricity prices encourage greater reliance on renewable energy, although this does not necessarily lead to increased investment in renewable capacity. Additionally, through comparative statics analysis, we reason that advancements in home automation will reduce the psychological cost of demand shifting, yet renewable energy investment does not straightforwardly increase due to associated uncertainties. To empirically support our analysis, we simulate one year of demand and wind generation data from PJM RTO, revealing that even a small-scale wind turbine requires more than five years to recover its investment costs. To further reason about policy implications, we extend our model by introducing two policy measures, renewable energy buyback and carbon emission penalties, and demonstrate analytically and numerically that a buyback policy boosts investment but may paradoxically increase reliance on traditional sources, while carbon emission penalties effectively reduce traditional energy use without necessarily increasing renewable energy investment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108875"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint decisions of renewable energy investment and daily energy procurement in smart microgrids\",\"authors\":\"Tian Wang ,&nbsp;Yangyang Liang ,&nbsp;Yongjing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores the joint decision-making problem of renewable energy investment and daily electricity procurement within smart microgrids. By considering time-of-use pricing, demand shifting, and the intermittent nature of renewable energy, we develop a two-stage optimization model: the first stage uses a quadratic investment cost function to determine renewable energy capacity, while the second stage adopts a stochastic decision-making approach based on two-point probability distributions to manage traditional energy procurement under uncertain renewable output. Our findings indicate that higher nighttime electricity prices encourage greater reliance on renewable energy, although this does not necessarily lead to increased investment in renewable capacity. Additionally, through comparative statics analysis, we reason that advancements in home automation will reduce the psychological cost of demand shifting, yet renewable energy investment does not straightforwardly increase due to associated uncertainties. To empirically support our analysis, we simulate one year of demand and wind generation data from PJM RTO, revealing that even a small-scale wind turbine requires more than five years to recover its investment costs. To further reason about policy implications, we extend our model by introducing two policy measures, renewable energy buyback and carbon emission penalties, and demonstrate analytically and numerically that a buyback policy boosts investment but may paradoxically increase reliance on traditional sources, while carbon emission penalties effectively reduce traditional energy use without necessarily increasing renewable energy investment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了智能微电网中可再生能源投资与日常购电的联合决策问题。考虑可再生能源的分时电价、需求转移和间歇性等因素,建立了两阶段优化模型:第一阶段采用二次投资成本函数确定可再生能源容量,第二阶段采用基于两点概率分布的随机决策方法管理可再生能源产出不确定情况下的传统能源采购。我们的研究结果表明,较高的夜间电价鼓励人们更多地依赖可再生能源,尽管这并不一定会导致对可再生能源产能的投资增加。此外,通过比较统计分析,我们推断家庭自动化的进步将降低需求转移的心理成本,但由于相关的不确定性,可再生能源投资不会直接增加。为了从经验上支持我们的分析,我们模拟了PJM RTO一年的需求和风力发电数据,结果表明,即使是小型风力涡轮机也需要五年以上的时间才能收回投资成本。为了进一步解释政策影响,我们通过引入可再生能源回购和碳排放处罚两项政策措施来扩展我们的模型,并通过分析和数值证明,回购政策促进了投资,但可能矛盾地增加了对传统能源的依赖,而碳排放处罚有效地减少了传统能源的使用,而不一定增加可再生能源投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Joint decisions of renewable energy investment and daily energy procurement in smart microgrids
This paper explores the joint decision-making problem of renewable energy investment and daily electricity procurement within smart microgrids. By considering time-of-use pricing, demand shifting, and the intermittent nature of renewable energy, we develop a two-stage optimization model: the first stage uses a quadratic investment cost function to determine renewable energy capacity, while the second stage adopts a stochastic decision-making approach based on two-point probability distributions to manage traditional energy procurement under uncertain renewable output. Our findings indicate that higher nighttime electricity prices encourage greater reliance on renewable energy, although this does not necessarily lead to increased investment in renewable capacity. Additionally, through comparative statics analysis, we reason that advancements in home automation will reduce the psychological cost of demand shifting, yet renewable energy investment does not straightforwardly increase due to associated uncertainties. To empirically support our analysis, we simulate one year of demand and wind generation data from PJM RTO, revealing that even a small-scale wind turbine requires more than five years to recover its investment costs. To further reason about policy implications, we extend our model by introducing two policy measures, renewable energy buyback and carbon emission penalties, and demonstrate analytically and numerically that a buyback policy boosts investment but may paradoxically increase reliance on traditional sources, while carbon emission penalties effectively reduce traditional energy use without necessarily increasing renewable energy investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信