{"title":"可持续多建筑设施中弹性服务和功能恢复的多灾害框架","authors":"Rachid Ouache , Jack Guo , David Bristow","doi":"10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhancing the resilience of multi-building facilities under natural hazards necessitates a detailed understanding of the interdependencies between building systems and critical operational functions. This study proposes a systematic and adaptable framework to model these service-function interdependencies, aiming to support continuity planning and optimize post-disruption recovery. The framework combines a hierarchical dependency structure, stakeholder-informed mapping, and a simulation-based recovery model, tailored for facilities exposed to seismic and flood risks. The methodology was applied to a three-building facility in Montreal, Canada. Simulation results demonstrated that flood-induced disruptions produced recovery durations approximately 300 % longer than those caused by earthquakes. Access systems showed the most extensive delays, requiring up to 2545 days for restoration after floods, in contrast to 500 days following seismic events. Similar delays were observed across power, telecommunications, and other critical services under flood conditions. Function-specific recovery profiles showed a notable divergence between hazard types. After earthquakes, essential operations such as Maintenance, Shipping and Receiving, and Marine Services retained 91–92 % functionality, while areas like Manufacturing and Environmental Compliance retained 82 %. Conversely, floods caused sharper initial impairments, with Quality Control Tests retaining 50 % of operational capacity and Marine Operations, Shipping, and Maintenance functions falling to approximately 5 %. Despite the greater initial severity, flood-related recoveries followed a more uniform timeline, with most functions restored within 1000 days. These findings underscore the need for hazard-specific mitigation strategies that reflect both the nature and duration of disruption. The framework provides a scalable decision-support tool to inform service prioritization, retrofitting investments, and long-term facility management in multi-hazard contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34137,"journal":{"name":"Developments in the Built Environment","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-hazard framework for resilient service and functional recovery in sustainable multi-building facilities\",\"authors\":\"Rachid Ouache , Jack Guo , David Bristow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Enhancing the resilience of multi-building facilities under natural hazards necessitates a detailed understanding of the interdependencies between building systems and critical operational functions. This study proposes a systematic and adaptable framework to model these service-function interdependencies, aiming to support continuity planning and optimize post-disruption recovery. The framework combines a hierarchical dependency structure, stakeholder-informed mapping, and a simulation-based recovery model, tailored for facilities exposed to seismic and flood risks. The methodology was applied to a three-building facility in Montreal, Canada. Simulation results demonstrated that flood-induced disruptions produced recovery durations approximately 300 % longer than those caused by earthquakes. Access systems showed the most extensive delays, requiring up to 2545 days for restoration after floods, in contrast to 500 days following seismic events. Similar delays were observed across power, telecommunications, and other critical services under flood conditions. Function-specific recovery profiles showed a notable divergence between hazard types. After earthquakes, essential operations such as Maintenance, Shipping and Receiving, and Marine Services retained 91–92 % functionality, while areas like Manufacturing and Environmental Compliance retained 82 %. Conversely, floods caused sharper initial impairments, with Quality Control Tests retaining 50 % of operational capacity and Marine Operations, Shipping, and Maintenance functions falling to approximately 5 %. Despite the greater initial severity, flood-related recoveries followed a more uniform timeline, with most functions restored within 1000 days. These findings underscore the need for hazard-specific mitigation strategies that reflect both the nature and duration of disruption. The framework provides a scalable decision-support tool to inform service prioritization, retrofitting investments, and long-term facility management in multi-hazard contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developments in the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165925001474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165925001474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A multi-hazard framework for resilient service and functional recovery in sustainable multi-building facilities
Enhancing the resilience of multi-building facilities under natural hazards necessitates a detailed understanding of the interdependencies between building systems and critical operational functions. This study proposes a systematic and adaptable framework to model these service-function interdependencies, aiming to support continuity planning and optimize post-disruption recovery. The framework combines a hierarchical dependency structure, stakeholder-informed mapping, and a simulation-based recovery model, tailored for facilities exposed to seismic and flood risks. The methodology was applied to a three-building facility in Montreal, Canada. Simulation results demonstrated that flood-induced disruptions produced recovery durations approximately 300 % longer than those caused by earthquakes. Access systems showed the most extensive delays, requiring up to 2545 days for restoration after floods, in contrast to 500 days following seismic events. Similar delays were observed across power, telecommunications, and other critical services under flood conditions. Function-specific recovery profiles showed a notable divergence between hazard types. After earthquakes, essential operations such as Maintenance, Shipping and Receiving, and Marine Services retained 91–92 % functionality, while areas like Manufacturing and Environmental Compliance retained 82 %. Conversely, floods caused sharper initial impairments, with Quality Control Tests retaining 50 % of operational capacity and Marine Operations, Shipping, and Maintenance functions falling to approximately 5 %. Despite the greater initial severity, flood-related recoveries followed a more uniform timeline, with most functions restored within 1000 days. These findings underscore the need for hazard-specific mitigation strategies that reflect both the nature and duration of disruption. The framework provides a scalable decision-support tool to inform service prioritization, retrofitting investments, and long-term facility management in multi-hazard contexts.
期刊介绍:
Developments in the Built Environment (DIBE) is a recently established peer-reviewed gold open access journal, ensuring that all accepted articles are permanently and freely accessible. Focused on civil engineering and the built environment, DIBE publishes original papers and short communications. Encompassing topics such as construction materials and building sustainability, the journal adopts a holistic approach with the aim of benefiting the community.