弯曲杆架旁路系统与创新箔形杆:液压,操作方面,和下游移动褐鳟的游泳行为

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Fan Yang, Anita Moldenhauer‐Roth, Yannick Marschall, David F. Vetsch, Oliver M. Selz, Yuhong Zeng, Robert M. Boes, Ismail Albayrak
{"title":"弯曲杆架旁路系统与创新箔形杆:液压,操作方面,和下游移动褐鳟的游泳行为","authors":"Fan Yang, Anita Moldenhauer‐Roth, Yannick Marschall, David F. Vetsch, Oliver M. Selz, Yuhong Zeng, Robert M. Boes, Ismail Albayrak","doi":"10.1029/2024wr038354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curved bar rack ‐ bypass systems (CBR‐BS) are a promising technology for diverting downstream moving fish away from hydropower intakes. A CBR functions as a mechanical behavioral barrier by creating high velocity and pressure gradients along its bars, guiding approaching fish that exhibit avoidance reactions towards the bypass. The original CBR design features a bar shape with spacings that narrow from the upstream to the downstream tip, which raises concerns about clogging due to foliage and floating debris. To address this issue, new foil‐shaped bars (f‐CBR) were developed with similar hydraulics while maintaining a constant bar spacing along the rack. To test its performance, a 1:1 physical model of a f‐CBR with a bar spacing of 25 mm was installed in an etho‐hydraulic flume. Live‐fish tests using brown trout were conducted at approach flow velocities of , 0.3, 0.6 m/s, with bypass‐to‐approach flow velocity ratios set at and 1.2. Additional tests with leaves and driftwood were performed to evaluate clogging probability of the f‐CBR. Flow fields were also numerically simulated for the tested flow conditions and linked to the fish behavior. Over all tested setups, fish guidance efficiencies between 47% and 66% were observed, while fish protection efficiencies ranged from 65% to 86%. These findings are compared with those from other types of behavioral fish guidance racks tested in both laboratory and field settings. Finally, potential measures for the optimal design of a f‐CBR‐BS are presented.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Curved‐Bar Rack‐Bypass System With Innovative Foil Shaped Bars: Hydraulics, Operational Aspects, and Swimming Behavior of Downstream Moving Brown Trout\",\"authors\":\"Fan Yang, Anita Moldenhauer‐Roth, Yannick Marschall, David F. Vetsch, Oliver M. Selz, Yuhong Zeng, Robert M. Boes, Ismail Albayrak\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024wr038354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Curved bar rack ‐ bypass systems (CBR‐BS) are a promising technology for diverting downstream moving fish away from hydropower intakes. A CBR functions as a mechanical behavioral barrier by creating high velocity and pressure gradients along its bars, guiding approaching fish that exhibit avoidance reactions towards the bypass. The original CBR design features a bar shape with spacings that narrow from the upstream to the downstream tip, which raises concerns about clogging due to foliage and floating debris. To address this issue, new foil‐shaped bars (f‐CBR) were developed with similar hydraulics while maintaining a constant bar spacing along the rack. To test its performance, a 1:1 physical model of a f‐CBR with a bar spacing of 25 mm was installed in an etho‐hydraulic flume. Live‐fish tests using brown trout were conducted at approach flow velocities of , 0.3, 0.6 m/s, with bypass‐to‐approach flow velocity ratios set at and 1.2. Additional tests with leaves and driftwood were performed to evaluate clogging probability of the f‐CBR. Flow fields were also numerically simulated for the tested flow conditions and linked to the fish behavior. Over all tested setups, fish guidance efficiencies between 47% and 66% were observed, while fish protection efficiencies ranged from 65% to 86%. These findings are compared with those from other types of behavioral fish guidance racks tested in both laboratory and field settings. Finally, potential measures for the optimal design of a f‐CBR‐BS are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038354\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

弯曲杆架-旁路系统(CBR - BS)是一种很有前途的技术,用于转移下游移动鱼类远离水电进水口。CBR作为一个机械行为屏障,通过沿其杆产生高速度和压力梯度,引导接近的鱼对旁路表现出回避反应。最初的CBR设计采用条形,从上游到下游尖端的间距变窄,这引起了人们对树叶和漂浮碎片造成堵塞的担忧。为了解决这个问题,新的箔形杆(f - CBR)被开发出来,采用类似的液压系统,同时保持沿机架的恒定杆距。为了测试其性能,在一个乙醇-水力水槽中安装了一个1:1的f - CBR物理模型,其杆距为25 mm。在接近流速分别为0.3和0.6 m/s的情况下,使用褐鳟进行活鱼试验,旁路与接近流速比分别为和1.2。用树叶和浮木进行了额外的试验,以评估f - CBR的堵塞概率。流场也被数值模拟了测试的流动条件,并与鱼的行为联系起来。在所有测试装置中,观察到鱼的引导效率在47%到66%之间,而鱼的保护效率在65%到86%之间。这些发现与在实验室和现场环境中测试的其他类型的行为鱼引导架的结果进行了比较。最后,提出了f - CBR - BS优化设计的可行措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Curved‐Bar Rack‐Bypass System With Innovative Foil Shaped Bars: Hydraulics, Operational Aspects, and Swimming Behavior of Downstream Moving Brown Trout
Curved bar rack ‐ bypass systems (CBR‐BS) are a promising technology for diverting downstream moving fish away from hydropower intakes. A CBR functions as a mechanical behavioral barrier by creating high velocity and pressure gradients along its bars, guiding approaching fish that exhibit avoidance reactions towards the bypass. The original CBR design features a bar shape with spacings that narrow from the upstream to the downstream tip, which raises concerns about clogging due to foliage and floating debris. To address this issue, new foil‐shaped bars (f‐CBR) were developed with similar hydraulics while maintaining a constant bar spacing along the rack. To test its performance, a 1:1 physical model of a f‐CBR with a bar spacing of 25 mm was installed in an etho‐hydraulic flume. Live‐fish tests using brown trout were conducted at approach flow velocities of , 0.3, 0.6 m/s, with bypass‐to‐approach flow velocity ratios set at and 1.2. Additional tests with leaves and driftwood were performed to evaluate clogging probability of the f‐CBR. Flow fields were also numerically simulated for the tested flow conditions and linked to the fish behavior. Over all tested setups, fish guidance efficiencies between 47% and 66% were observed, while fish protection efficiencies ranged from 65% to 86%. These findings are compared with those from other types of behavioral fish guidance racks tested in both laboratory and field settings. Finally, potential measures for the optimal design of a f‐CBR‐BS are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信