{"title":"语言样本启发情境对学龄前聋儿和重听儿童复杂句法使用和生产能力的影响。","authors":"Tiana M Cowan, Emily Lund, Krystal Werfel","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech-language pathologists tailor language sample elicitation methods to the goals of the assessment and the needs of each child. In school-age children, narrative retell and expository contexts elicit more complex language than conversational contexts. However, the impact of elicitation context on younger children has been less examined. This study examined how conversational, expository, and narrative retell contexts influence productivity and complex syntax in preschool-age children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) compared to peers with typical hearing (CTH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from Werfel et al. (2021). Participants were sixty-nine 4-year-old English-speaking children in three groups: DHH, age-matched peers (CTH-Age), and language-matched peers (CTH-Lang). Amplification type varied among participants who were DHH and included cochlear implants, hearing aids, and bone-anchored hearing aids. All participants communicated with spoken English and had limited exposure to sign language. Language samples were collected using Hadley's (1998) protocol, segmented by elicitation context, and analyzed for productivity (number of utterances, mean length of utterance in morphemes [MLUm]) and complex syntax use (proportion of complex syntax attempts). Generalized linear mixed models examined the effects of group and context on performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups produced significantly more utterances in conversational contexts than in expository discourse or narrative retell. After accounting for the proportion of utterances per context, all groups produced utterances with significantly higher MLUm values and significantly more complex syntax attempts in expository discourse than in conversation. A similar, although nonsignificant, trend was observed for narrative retell.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elicitation context influences productivity and complex syntax use in preschool-age children with and without hearing loss. Findings support the inclusion of varied contexts in clinical language sampling to match specific assessment goals, with expository and narrative retell contexts offering valuable opportunities to elicit complex syntax in preschool-age children.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4865-4877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Language Sample Elicitation Context on Complex Syntax Use and Productivity in Preschool-Age Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.\",\"authors\":\"Tiana M Cowan, Emily Lund, Krystal Werfel\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech-language pathologists tailor language sample elicitation methods to the goals of the assessment and the needs of each child. In school-age children, narrative retell and expository contexts elicit more complex language than conversational contexts. However, the impact of elicitation context on younger children has been less examined. This study examined how conversational, expository, and narrative retell contexts influence productivity and complex syntax in preschool-age children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) compared to peers with typical hearing (CTH).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from Werfel et al. (2021). Participants were sixty-nine 4-year-old English-speaking children in three groups: DHH, age-matched peers (CTH-Age), and language-matched peers (CTH-Lang). Amplification type varied among participants who were DHH and included cochlear implants, hearing aids, and bone-anchored hearing aids. All participants communicated with spoken English and had limited exposure to sign language. Language samples were collected using Hadley's (1998) protocol, segmented by elicitation context, and analyzed for productivity (number of utterances, mean length of utterance in morphemes [MLUm]) and complex syntax use (proportion of complex syntax attempts). Generalized linear mixed models examined the effects of group and context on performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups produced significantly more utterances in conversational contexts than in expository discourse or narrative retell. After accounting for the proportion of utterances per context, all groups produced utterances with significantly higher MLUm values and significantly more complex syntax attempts in expository discourse than in conversation. A similar, although nonsignificant, trend was observed for narrative retell.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elicitation context influences productivity and complex syntax use in preschool-age children with and without hearing loss. Findings support the inclusion of varied contexts in clinical language sampling to match specific assessment goals, with expository and narrative retell contexts offering valuable opportunities to elicit complex syntax in preschool-age children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4865-4877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:语言病理学家根据评估目标和每个孩子的需要量身定制语言样本启发方法。在学龄儿童中,叙事性复述和说明性语境比会话语境引出更复杂的语言。然而,启发情境对年幼儿童的影响研究较少。本研究考察了对话、说说性和叙述性复述情境如何影响失聪和听力障碍学龄前儿童(DHH)与正常听力儿童(CTH)的学习效率和复杂语法。方法:该二次分析使用的数据来自Werfel et al.(2021)。参与者是69名说英语的4岁儿童,分为三组:DHH,年龄匹配的同伴(CTH-Age)和语言匹配的同伴(CTH-Lang)。放大类型在DHH参与者中有所不同,包括人工耳蜗、助听器和骨锚式助听器。所有的参与者都用英语口语交流,并且很少接触手语。使用Hadley(1998)协议收集语言样本,根据引出上下文进行分割,并分析生产力(话语数量,语素中的平均话语长度[MLUm])和复杂句法使用(复杂句法尝试的比例)。广义线性混合模型考察了群体和环境对绩效的影响。结果:所有小组在会话语境中发表的话语明显多于说明性话语或叙述性复述。在考虑了每个上下文的话语比例后,所有组在说明性话语中产生的话语的MLUm值都明显高于会话,并且语法尝试的复杂性也明显高于会话。在叙述复述方面也有类似的趋势,尽管不显著。结论:启发性语境影响有或无听力损失的学龄前儿童的生产力和复杂句法的使用。研究结果支持在临床语言抽样中包含不同的上下文,以匹配特定的评估目标,说说性和叙述性复述上下文为学龄前儿童提供了诱发复杂语法的宝贵机会。
The Effect of Language Sample Elicitation Context on Complex Syntax Use and Productivity in Preschool-Age Children Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
Purpose: Speech-language pathologists tailor language sample elicitation methods to the goals of the assessment and the needs of each child. In school-age children, narrative retell and expository contexts elicit more complex language than conversational contexts. However, the impact of elicitation context on younger children has been less examined. This study examined how conversational, expository, and narrative retell contexts influence productivity and complex syntax in preschool-age children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) compared to peers with typical hearing (CTH).
Method: This secondary analysis used data from Werfel et al. (2021). Participants were sixty-nine 4-year-old English-speaking children in three groups: DHH, age-matched peers (CTH-Age), and language-matched peers (CTH-Lang). Amplification type varied among participants who were DHH and included cochlear implants, hearing aids, and bone-anchored hearing aids. All participants communicated with spoken English and had limited exposure to sign language. Language samples were collected using Hadley's (1998) protocol, segmented by elicitation context, and analyzed for productivity (number of utterances, mean length of utterance in morphemes [MLUm]) and complex syntax use (proportion of complex syntax attempts). Generalized linear mixed models examined the effects of group and context on performance.
Results: All groups produced significantly more utterances in conversational contexts than in expository discourse or narrative retell. After accounting for the proportion of utterances per context, all groups produced utterances with significantly higher MLUm values and significantly more complex syntax attempts in expository discourse than in conversation. A similar, although nonsignificant, trend was observed for narrative retell.
Conclusions: Elicitation context influences productivity and complex syntax use in preschool-age children with and without hearing loss. Findings support the inclusion of varied contexts in clinical language sampling to match specific assessment goals, with expository and narrative retell contexts offering valuable opportunities to elicit complex syntax in preschool-age children.