Andrew D Trunk, Yanwen Chen, Aaron T Gerds, Akriti Jain, Sudipto Mukherjee, Sophia Balderman, Hetty Carraway, Betty K Hamilton, Ronald Sobecks, Matt Kalaycio, Craig Sauter, Claudio Brunstein
{"title":"骨髓增殖性肿瘤患者的清骨髓和低强度同种异体移植。","authors":"Andrew D Trunk, Yanwen Chen, Aaron T Gerds, Akriti Jain, Sudipto Mukherjee, Sophia Balderman, Hetty Carraway, Betty K Hamilton, Ronald Sobecks, Matt Kalaycio, Craig Sauter, Claudio Brunstein","doi":"10.4103/hemoncstem.HEMONCSTEM-D-25-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Older age, comorbidities, and often advanced disease make patient selection and optimal transplant timing challenging. This study sought to understand allo-HCT outcomes for these myeloproliferative neoplasms in a contemporary era, including molecular data, to define a uniform transplant approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on patients with MF or CMML who received allo-HCT at the Cleveland Clinic between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. All donor types and graft sources were included. MF and CMML outcomes were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine MF and 33 CMML patients were included. JAK2 V617F was detected in 57.6% of MF patients; only 34 (57.6%) had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed. Most MF transplants were reduced intensity (RIC; 69.5%) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC; 91%). At median follow-up of 41 months, 28/59 (47.5%) MF patients were alive. MF patients who were JAK2+ with additional cytogenetic changes or concurrent mutations had better overall survival. In CMML, 69.7% had myeloid NGS, with ASXL1 identified in 51.9% of cases. Most transplants were RIC (66.7%) and PBSC (72.7%). At median follow-up of 46.8 mos, 13/33 (39.4%) patients were alive. Relapse accounted for 9/20 CMML deaths; 8 of these received RIC. Mutational signature did not significantly impact survival, though the presence of any cytogenetic aberrancy was associated with worse OS (12 mos, 95% CI, 7.13-NA vs. 24.2 mos, 9.6-NA; P = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For MF and CMML, older patients (≥65) and RIC transplants trended toward worse survival. Strategies to reduce relapse and optimize patient selection utilizing molecular and cytogenetic data should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":516321,"journal":{"name":"Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myeloablative and Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Transplant in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew D Trunk, Yanwen Chen, Aaron T Gerds, Akriti Jain, Sudipto Mukherjee, Sophia Balderman, Hetty Carraway, Betty K Hamilton, Ronald Sobecks, Matt Kalaycio, Craig Sauter, Claudio Brunstein\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/hemoncstem.HEMONCSTEM-D-25-00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Older age, comorbidities, and often advanced disease make patient selection and optimal transplant timing challenging. This study sought to understand allo-HCT outcomes for these myeloproliferative neoplasms in a contemporary era, including molecular data, to define a uniform transplant approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed on patients with MF or CMML who received allo-HCT at the Cleveland Clinic between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. All donor types and graft sources were included. MF and CMML outcomes were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine MF and 33 CMML patients were included. JAK2 V617F was detected in 57.6% of MF patients; only 34 (57.6%) had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed. Most MF transplants were reduced intensity (RIC; 69.5%) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC; 91%). At median follow-up of 41 months, 28/59 (47.5%) MF patients were alive. MF patients who were JAK2+ with additional cytogenetic changes or concurrent mutations had better overall survival. In CMML, 69.7% had myeloid NGS, with ASXL1 identified in 51.9% of cases. Most transplants were RIC (66.7%) and PBSC (72.7%). At median follow-up of 46.8 mos, 13/33 (39.4%) patients were alive. Relapse accounted for 9/20 CMML deaths; 8 of these received RIC. Mutational signature did not significantly impact survival, though the presence of any cytogenetic aberrancy was associated with worse OS (12 mos, 95% CI, 7.13-NA vs. 24.2 mos, 9.6-NA; P = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For MF and CMML, older patients (≥65) and RIC transplants trended toward worse survival. Strategies to reduce relapse and optimize patient selection utilizing molecular and cytogenetic data should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/hemoncstem.HEMONCSTEM-D-25-00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hemoncstem.HEMONCSTEM-D-25-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:同种异体造血细胞移植是治疗骨髓纤维化(MF)和慢性髓单细胞白血病(CMML)的唯一潜在治疗方法。年龄较大、合并症和经常是晚期疾病使患者选择和最佳移植时机具有挑战性。本研究旨在了解当代这些骨髓增殖性肿瘤的同种异体hct结果,包括分子数据,以确定统一的移植方法。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月1日至2023年4月1日在克利夫兰诊所接受allo-HCT治疗的MF或CMML患者。包括所有供体类型和移植物来源。分别分析MF和CMML结果。结果:纳入MF患者59例,CMML患者33例。57.6%的MF患者检测到JAK2 V617F;仅34例(57.6%)进行了下一代测序(NGS)。大多数MF移植是降低强度(RIC; 69.5%)和外周血干细胞(PBSC; 91%)。中位随访41个月时,59例MF患者中有28例(47.5%)存活。伴有额外细胞遗传学改变或并发突变的JAK2+ MF患者总生存率更高。在CMML中,69.7%的患者有髓系NGS, 51.9%的患者有ASXL1。大多数移植为RIC(66.7%)和PBSC(72.7%)。在46.8个月的中位随访中,13/33(39.4%)患者存活。复发占CMML死亡的9/20;其中8人接受了RIC。突变特征对生存率没有显著影响,但任何细胞遗传异常的存在与较差的OS相关(12个,95% CI, 7.13-NA vs. 24.2个,9.6-NA; P = 0.19)。结论:对于MF和CMML,年龄较大(≥65岁)的患者和RIC移植患者有更差的生存趋势。应考虑利用分子和细胞遗传学数据减少复发和优化患者选择的策略。
Myeloablative and Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Transplant in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Older age, comorbidities, and often advanced disease make patient selection and optimal transplant timing challenging. This study sought to understand allo-HCT outcomes for these myeloproliferative neoplasms in a contemporary era, including molecular data, to define a uniform transplant approach.
Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on patients with MF or CMML who received allo-HCT at the Cleveland Clinic between January 1, 2010 and April 1, 2023. All donor types and graft sources were included. MF and CMML outcomes were analyzed separately.
Results: Fifty-nine MF and 33 CMML patients were included. JAK2 V617F was detected in 57.6% of MF patients; only 34 (57.6%) had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed. Most MF transplants were reduced intensity (RIC; 69.5%) and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC; 91%). At median follow-up of 41 months, 28/59 (47.5%) MF patients were alive. MF patients who were JAK2+ with additional cytogenetic changes or concurrent mutations had better overall survival. In CMML, 69.7% had myeloid NGS, with ASXL1 identified in 51.9% of cases. Most transplants were RIC (66.7%) and PBSC (72.7%). At median follow-up of 46.8 mos, 13/33 (39.4%) patients were alive. Relapse accounted for 9/20 CMML deaths; 8 of these received RIC. Mutational signature did not significantly impact survival, though the presence of any cytogenetic aberrancy was associated with worse OS (12 mos, 95% CI, 7.13-NA vs. 24.2 mos, 9.6-NA; P = 0.19).
Conclusion: For MF and CMML, older patients (≥65) and RIC transplants trended toward worse survival. Strategies to reduce relapse and optimize patient selection utilizing molecular and cytogenetic data should be considered.