New tools for the grading and scoring of gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition characterized by the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the esophagus, significantly impacting quality of life. Traditional diagnostic approaches often lack precision due to symptom overlap with other conditions. This review introduces the American Foregut Society (AFS) classification, Milan score, pHoenix score, COuGH RefluX score, and Lyon score, five novel tools designed to enhance the objectivity, reproducibility, and clinical relevance of GERD diagnosis.

The AFS classification refines the endoscopic assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) integrity by incorporating measurable parameters (hiatal hernia length, hiatal aperture diameter, and flap valve), overcoming the subjectivity of the Hill classification. The Milan score, derived from high-resolution manometry, integrates four parameters (ineffective esophageal motility, EGJ-contractile integral, EGJ morphology, and straight leg raise response) to quantify anti-reflux barrier (ARB) disruption.

The pHoenix score, developed for prolonged wireless pH monitoring, weights supine AET more heavily, addressing limitations of the DeMeester score and Lyon 2.0 consensus. The COuGH RefluX score, a clinical prediction model for laryngopharyngeal symptoms, uses six parameters (cough, obesity, globus, hiatal hernia, regurgitation, male sex) to stratify GERD likelihood. Finally, the Lyon score integrates endoscopic and pH-impedance data, categorizing patients into phenotypes (from no GERD to severe GERD) and predicting treatment outcomes.

These tools collectively address diagnostic challenges by standardizing assessments and improving patient stratification. By reducing diagnostic ambiguity and guiding personalized therapy, these innovations hold promise for transforming GERD management, particularly in selecting candidates for escalated medical or surgical interventions.