不同表皮敷料治疗二度烧伤的临床疗效:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

IF 1.5
Liang Ge, Jinlong Xu, Weijing Sun, Shijie Li, Yongxing Wang, Lixia Di, Yan Ou, Dezhi Han
{"title":"不同表皮敷料治疗二度烧伤的临床疗效:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Liang Ge, Jinlong Xu, Weijing Sun, Shijie Li, Yongxing Wang, Lixia Di, Yan Ou, Dezhi Han","doi":"10.1177/15347346251374829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundA variety of dressings are used for burn patients in the clinic, and the difference in efficacy between different dressings is controversial Therefore, we used Bayesian net meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 14 dressings in patients with second-degree burns.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and China Knowledge Network databases were searched to collect randomised controlled trials on different dressings used in the treatment of second-degree burns that met the inclusion criteria from 2010-01 to 2024-12 in each database. Literature was screened by 2 investigators, who independently collected and organised the data for extraction, assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Review Manager 5.4, and scored the evidence using GRADEPro. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using R Studio, and SUCRA was used to rank the included dressings for each outcome indicator.ResultsA total of 28 studies containing 2072 patients with second-degree burns and 14 different interventions were included, and the results of the network meta-analysis showed that:1) the top 3 results of the ranked probability of wound healing rate within 2 weeks were: human amniotic membrane (85.3%)>Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor(81.7%)>Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(78.1%); ②The top three results in terms of wound healing time were: Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(1.6%)ConclusionBased on the SUCRA values and NMA results, we found that Human amniotic membrane can significantly increase the wound healing rate of patients with second-degree burns, Recombinant Human Erythropoietin can significantly shorten the wound healing time, and Heparin has a better effect on reducing the pain of burn patients.However, limited by the quality of the included literature, further high-quality clinical studies are needed to confirm this.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251374829"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Different Epidermal Dressings in Patients with Second Degree Burns: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Ge, Jinlong Xu, Weijing Sun, Shijie Li, Yongxing Wang, Lixia Di, Yan Ou, Dezhi Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15347346251374829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundA variety of dressings are used for burn patients in the clinic, and the difference in efficacy between different dressings is controversial Therefore, we used Bayesian net meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 14 dressings in patients with second-degree burns.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and China Knowledge Network databases were searched to collect randomised controlled trials on different dressings used in the treatment of second-degree burns that met the inclusion criteria from 2010-01 to 2024-12 in each database. Literature was screened by 2 investigators, who independently collected and organised the data for extraction, assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Review Manager 5.4, and scored the evidence using GRADEPro. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using R Studio, and SUCRA was used to rank the included dressings for each outcome indicator.ResultsA total of 28 studies containing 2072 patients with second-degree burns and 14 different interventions were included, and the results of the network meta-analysis showed that:1) the top 3 results of the ranked probability of wound healing rate within 2 weeks were: human amniotic membrane (85.3%)>Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor(81.7%)>Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(78.1%); ②The top three results in terms of wound healing time were: Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(1.6%)ConclusionBased on the SUCRA values and NMA results, we found that Human amniotic membrane can significantly increase the wound healing rate of patients with second-degree burns, Recombinant Human Erythropoietin can significantly shorten the wound healing time, and Heparin has a better effect on reducing the pain of burn patients.However, limited by the quality of the included literature, further high-quality clinical studies are needed to confirm this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15347346251374829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of lower extremity wounds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251374829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251374829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床烧伤患者使用的敷料种类繁多,不同敷料的疗效差异存在争议,因此,我们采用贝叶斯网meta分析对14种敷料在二度烧伤患者中的临床疗效进行评价。方法检索spubmed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase和中国知识网数据库,收集各数据库2010-01 ~ 2024-12年间符合纳入标准的不同敷料治疗二度烧伤的随机对照试验。文献筛选由2名研究者进行,他们独立收集和组织提取数据,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和Review Manager 5.4评估纳入研究的质量,并使用GRADEPro对证据进行评分。使用R Studio进行网络荟萃分析(NMA),并使用SUCRA对纳入的敷料进行每个结果指标的排名。结果共纳入28项研究,共2072例二度烧伤患者,14种不同的干预措施,网络荟萃分析结果显示:1)2周内创面愈合概率排名前3位的结果为:人羊膜(85.3%)>重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(81.7%)>重组人促红细胞生成素(78.1%);②创面愈合时间排名前三位的分别是:重组人促红细胞生成素(1.6%)结论结合SUCRA值和NMA结果,我们发现人羊膜能显著提高烧伤患者创面愈合速度,重组人促红细胞生成素能显著缩短烧伤患者创面愈合时间,肝素对减轻烧伤患者疼痛有较好的效果。然而,受纳入文献质量的限制,需要进一步的高质量临床研究来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Different Epidermal Dressings in Patients with Second Degree Burns: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundA variety of dressings are used for burn patients in the clinic, and the difference in efficacy between different dressings is controversial Therefore, we used Bayesian net meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 14 dressings in patients with second-degree burns.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and China Knowledge Network databases were searched to collect randomised controlled trials on different dressings used in the treatment of second-degree burns that met the inclusion criteria from 2010-01 to 2024-12 in each database. Literature was screened by 2 investigators, who independently collected and organised the data for extraction, assessed the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Review Manager 5.4, and scored the evidence using GRADEPro. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using R Studio, and SUCRA was used to rank the included dressings for each outcome indicator.ResultsA total of 28 studies containing 2072 patients with second-degree burns and 14 different interventions were included, and the results of the network meta-analysis showed that:1) the top 3 results of the ranked probability of wound healing rate within 2 weeks were: human amniotic membrane (85.3%)>Recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor(81.7%)>Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(78.1%); ②The top three results in terms of wound healing time were: Recombinant Human Erythropoietin(1.6%)ConclusionBased on the SUCRA values and NMA results, we found that Human amniotic membrane can significantly increase the wound healing rate of patients with second-degree burns, Recombinant Human Erythropoietin can significantly shorten the wound healing time, and Heparin has a better effect on reducing the pain of burn patients.However, limited by the quality of the included literature, further high-quality clinical studies are needed to confirm this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信