{"title":"量化业余跑步者的跑步经济性:基于模型归一化的VO2和能量成本评估。","authors":"Jay Lee, Xiuli Zhang, Zhaowei Kong","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 3","pages":"684-695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO<sub>2</sub> and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Lee, Xiuli Zhang, Zhaowei Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2025.684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"684-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.684\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO2 and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization.
Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO2sub) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO2sub as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (Ec, kcal/kgb/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO2max tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO2max intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO2sub or Ec with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO2sub and Ec significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO2sub is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both Ec and VO2sub, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled Ec was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO2max. While VO2sub is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO2max intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.