量化业余跑步者的跑步经济性:基于模型归一化的VO2和能量成本评估。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Jay Lee, Xiuli Zhang, Zhaowei Kong
{"title":"量化业余跑步者的跑步经济性:基于模型归一化的VO2和能量成本评估。","authors":"Jay Lee, Xiuli Zhang, Zhaowei Kong","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 3","pages":"684-695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO<sub>2</sub> and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Lee, Xiuli Zhang, Zhaowei Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2025.684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"684-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.684\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚最大摄氧量(VO2sub)通常用于评估跑步经济性(RE),以反映给定的次最大强度速度下的代谢消耗。然而,这种方法是有问题的,因为它忽略了衬底相关的问题和固有的数学差异在比例缩放。本研究旨在通过与异速尺度能量成本(Ec, kcal/kgb/min)的比较,探讨比值尺度VO2sub作为RE指标的有效性。69名娱乐性运动大学生在3% VO2max强度下进行了VO2max测试和间断次最大跑步评估。1000米测试评估跑步性能。单向重复测量方差分析比较了VO2sub或Ec随跑步强度增加的变化。回归分析探讨了代谢数据标准化的方法。Pearson相关系数评估标准化的有效性,以及运动成绩与RE之间的相关性。使用基于量级的推断来评估性别差异和每个跑步强度下RE的概率。随着强度的增加,VO2sub和VO2sub均显著增加,表明VO2sub是有效的RE量化指标。异速缩放比比例缩放更适合去除体重对Ec和VO2sub的影响,雌性表现出更好的RE。异速缩放Ec在检测性能相关性方面很敏感,在65% VO2max时最强。虽然VO2sub是一种有效的可再生能源量化方法,但在进行可靠的个体间比较之前,应使用异速缩放而不是比例缩放来标准化可再生能源量化。2/3定律可以看作是体重的指数b值。另外,在RE测试中,推荐65%的vo2max强度作为次最大测试强度。然而,需要更多不同样本的研究来证实其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO2 and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization.

Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO2sub) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO2sub as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (Ec, kcal/kgb/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO2max tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO2max intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO2sub or Ec with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO2sub and Ec significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO2sub is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both Ec and VO2sub, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled Ec was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO2max. While VO2sub is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO2max intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信