人生最后阶段的深思陪伴:哲学实践对伦理咨询的补充。

IF 2.1 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70031
Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner
{"title":"人生最后阶段的深思陪伴:哲学实践对伦理咨询的补充。","authors":"Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper argues that philosophical practice can complement existing medical ethics structures by offering a publicly accessible space for discourse and negotiation of basic concepts that are relevant to ethical decision making. The potential of collaboration becomes particularly evident by the example of assisted dying: it raises a wide range of philosophical questions which, however, tend to remain unarticulated where there is urgency for action and focus on ethical dilemma. In this paper, we first provide an analysis of the neglect of profound questions in ethics consultation and why these need to be considered and negotiated within a broader socio-philosophical framework and place. These reflections are grounded in conceptual approaches informed by Immanuel Kant, Charles Taylor, and the tradition of Hellenistic philosophy as interpreted by Pierre Hadot. These frameworks are not presented as final answers, but as productive starting points and historically significant philosophical thought figures for engaging with the complex philosophical dimensions of assisted suicide. Then, we draw upon insights from an ongoing research project on philosophical practice in palliative care and hospice work. Interim results indicate that people experience a need for a kind of dialogue that gives such philosophical considerations a space and a person who is capable of facilitating it. Synthesizing theoretical-philosophical and empirical insights, the paper provides an outlook for fruitful collaboration amongst medical ethics structures and philosophical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoughtful Accompaniment in Life's Final Stages: Philosophical Practice as a Complement to Ethics Consultation.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bioe.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper argues that philosophical practice can complement existing medical ethics structures by offering a publicly accessible space for discourse and negotiation of basic concepts that are relevant to ethical decision making. The potential of collaboration becomes particularly evident by the example of assisted dying: it raises a wide range of philosophical questions which, however, tend to remain unarticulated where there is urgency for action and focus on ethical dilemma. In this paper, we first provide an analysis of the neglect of profound questions in ethics consultation and why these need to be considered and negotiated within a broader socio-philosophical framework and place. These reflections are grounded in conceptual approaches informed by Immanuel Kant, Charles Taylor, and the tradition of Hellenistic philosophy as interpreted by Pierre Hadot. These frameworks are not presented as final answers, but as productive starting points and historically significant philosophical thought figures for engaging with the complex philosophical dimensions of assisted suicide. Then, we draw upon insights from an ongoing research project on philosophical practice in palliative care and hospice work. Interim results indicate that people experience a need for a kind of dialogue that gives such philosophical considerations a space and a person who is capable of facilitating it. Synthesizing theoretical-philosophical and empirical insights, the paper provides an outlook for fruitful collaboration amongst medical ethics structures and philosophical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,哲学实践可以为与伦理决策相关的基本概念提供一个公开的话语和谈判空间,从而补充现有的医学伦理结构。合作的潜力在协助死亡的例子中变得尤为明显:它提出了一系列广泛的哲学问题,然而,在行动的紧迫性和对道德困境的关注方面,这些问题往往没有得到明确的阐述。在本文中,我们首先分析了伦理咨询中对深刻问题的忽视,以及为什么这些问题需要在更广泛的社会哲学框架和场所中进行考虑和谈判。这些反思是基于伊曼努尔·康德、查尔斯·泰勒和皮埃尔·哈多所解释的希腊哲学传统的概念方法。这些框架不是作为最终答案呈现的,而是作为富有成效的起点和具有历史意义的哲学思想人物,用于参与协助自杀的复杂哲学维度。然后,我们从一个正在进行的关于姑息治疗和临终关怀工作的哲学实践的研究项目中吸取见解。中期结果表明,人们需要一种对话,为这种哲学思考提供空间,并需要一个能够促进这种对话的人。综合理论哲学和实证见解,本文提供了医学伦理结构和哲学实践之间富有成效的合作前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoughtful Accompaniment in Life's Final Stages: Philosophical Practice as a Complement to Ethics Consultation.

This paper argues that philosophical practice can complement existing medical ethics structures by offering a publicly accessible space for discourse and negotiation of basic concepts that are relevant to ethical decision making. The potential of collaboration becomes particularly evident by the example of assisted dying: it raises a wide range of philosophical questions which, however, tend to remain unarticulated where there is urgency for action and focus on ethical dilemma. In this paper, we first provide an analysis of the neglect of profound questions in ethics consultation and why these need to be considered and negotiated within a broader socio-philosophical framework and place. These reflections are grounded in conceptual approaches informed by Immanuel Kant, Charles Taylor, and the tradition of Hellenistic philosophy as interpreted by Pierre Hadot. These frameworks are not presented as final answers, but as productive starting points and historically significant philosophical thought figures for engaging with the complex philosophical dimensions of assisted suicide. Then, we draw upon insights from an ongoing research project on philosophical practice in palliative care and hospice work. Interim results indicate that people experience a need for a kind of dialogue that gives such philosophical considerations a space and a person who is capable of facilitating it. Synthesizing theoretical-philosophical and empirical insights, the paper provides an outlook for fruitful collaboration amongst medical ethics structures and philosophical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信