Wei Qiao, Kai Hua, Jincheng Zhang, Dingding Song, Jie Li, Xiaolong Chen, Dong Liang
{"title":"高心率强度对小面比赛战术决策和技术准确性有负向影响——场地大小和计分方法操作影响的研究","authors":"Wei Qiao, Kai Hua, Jincheng Zhang, Dingding Song, Jie Li, Xiaolong Chen, Dong Liang","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated how varying task constraints - pitch size and the presence of a goal - affect psychophysiological intensity, technical execution, and tactical decision-making in small-sided games (SSGs). The study also examined correlations between intensities and technical and tactical performance. Thirty-six regional-level male youth soccer players (aged 16.5 ± 0.5 years) participated in a four-week intervention using a non-controlled, repeated-measures design within a single cohort. Players completed 3v3 SSGs under six conditions combining three pitch sizes (75, 100, and 125 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and two task goals (ball possession vs. small goals). Each session included standardized warm-ups and three 4-minute bouts per condition. Psychophysiological responses were measured via Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and heart rate monitoring (HRmean, % time in Zone 5). Technical actions (passes, receptions, dribbles, shots) and tactical decision-making (Passing Decision-Making index) were assessed through video-based analysis. Significant interactions (p < 0.001) between field size and scoring method were found for HR measures and passing. Ball possession games showed higher HRmean and HR Zone 5 across all field sizes compared to small-goal games (p < 0.001). However, even in small-goal games, HRmean and HR Zone 5 significantly increased with larger field sizes (p < 0.001). Small-goal games resulted in more successful dribbles (p < 0.001), with fewer successful passes on the smallest field. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HRmean and successful shots (r = -0.346, p = 0.039), and between time in HR Zone 5 and the passing decision-making index (r = -0.363, p = 0.029). The study suggests that both field size and scoring method significantly influence players' physiological responses, technical performance, and decision-making. Ball possession games and larger fields increase physical intensity and passing success, while smaller fields and small-goal games promote dribbling. However, higher physiological strain appears to negatively impact shooting effectiveness and decision-making quality, although these correlations are moderate and no definitive conclusions can be drawn or generalized.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 3","pages":"522-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Heart Rate Intensity Can Negatively Impact Tactical Decision-Making and Technical Accuracy in Small-Sided Games: A Study on The Effects of Field Size and Scoring Method Manipulation.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Qiao, Kai Hua, Jincheng Zhang, Dingding Song, Jie Li, Xiaolong Chen, Dong Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2025.522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated how varying task constraints - pitch size and the presence of a goal - affect psychophysiological intensity, technical execution, and tactical decision-making in small-sided games (SSGs). The study also examined correlations between intensities and technical and tactical performance. Thirty-six regional-level male youth soccer players (aged 16.5 ± 0.5 years) participated in a four-week intervention using a non-controlled, repeated-measures design within a single cohort. Players completed 3v3 SSGs under six conditions combining three pitch sizes (75, 100, and 125 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and two task goals (ball possession vs. small goals). Each session included standardized warm-ups and three 4-minute bouts per condition. Psychophysiological responses were measured via Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and heart rate monitoring (HRmean, % time in Zone 5). Technical actions (passes, receptions, dribbles, shots) and tactical decision-making (Passing Decision-Making index) were assessed through video-based analysis. Significant interactions (p < 0.001) between field size and scoring method were found for HR measures and passing. Ball possession games showed higher HRmean and HR Zone 5 across all field sizes compared to small-goal games (p < 0.001). However, even in small-goal games, HRmean and HR Zone 5 significantly increased with larger field sizes (p < 0.001). Small-goal games resulted in more successful dribbles (p < 0.001), with fewer successful passes on the smallest field. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HRmean and successful shots (r = -0.346, p = 0.039), and between time in HR Zone 5 and the passing decision-making index (r = -0.363, p = 0.029). The study suggests that both field size and scoring method significantly influence players' physiological responses, technical performance, and decision-making. Ball possession games and larger fields increase physical intensity and passing success, while smaller fields and small-goal games promote dribbling. However, higher physiological strain appears to negatively impact shooting effectiveness and decision-making quality, although these correlations are moderate and no definitive conclusions can be drawn or generalized.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"522-531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418178/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.522\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究调查了不同的任务约束——球场大小和进球的存在——如何影响小方比赛(ssg)中的心理生理强度、技术执行和战术决策。该研究还调查了强度与技战术表现之间的关系。36名地区级别的男性青少年足球运动员(年龄16.5±0.5岁)参加了为期四周的干预,采用非对照、重复测量设计,在单一队列中进行。在三种场地大小(75、100和125平方米)和两个任务目标(控球vs小目标)的六种条件下,球员完成了3v3 ssg。每次训练包括标准化的热身和三次4分钟的回合。心理生理反应通过感知运动等级(RPE)和心率监测(HRmean, %时间在5区)来测量。技术动作(传球、接球、运球、射门)和战术决策(传球决策指数)通过基于视频的分析进行评估。在人力资源测量和通过方面,场地大小和评分方法之间存在显著的相互作用(p < 0.001)。与小球门比赛相比,控球比赛在所有场地尺寸上都显示出更高的HRmean和HR Zone 5 (p < 0.001)。然而,即使在小进球比赛中,HRmean和HR Zone 5也会随着场地的扩大而显著增加(p < 0.001)。小球门比赛的带球成功率更高(p < 0.001),而在最小的场地上传球成功率更低。HRmean与射门成功率呈中度负相关(r = -0.346, p = 0.039), HR Zone 5时间与传球决策指数呈中度负相关(r = -0.363, p = 0.029)。研究表明,场地大小和得分方法对球员的生理反应、技术表现和决策都有显著影响。控球比赛和较大的场地会增加身体强度和传球成功率,而较小的场地和小目标比赛则会促进盘带。然而,较高的生理应变似乎会对射击效率和决策质量产生负面影响,尽管这些相关性是适度的,并且没有明确的结论可以得出或推广。
Higher Heart Rate Intensity Can Negatively Impact Tactical Decision-Making and Technical Accuracy in Small-Sided Games: A Study on The Effects of Field Size and Scoring Method Manipulation.
This study investigated how varying task constraints - pitch size and the presence of a goal - affect psychophysiological intensity, technical execution, and tactical decision-making in small-sided games (SSGs). The study also examined correlations between intensities and technical and tactical performance. Thirty-six regional-level male youth soccer players (aged 16.5 ± 0.5 years) participated in a four-week intervention using a non-controlled, repeated-measures design within a single cohort. Players completed 3v3 SSGs under six conditions combining three pitch sizes (75, 100, and 125 m2 per player) and two task goals (ball possession vs. small goals). Each session included standardized warm-ups and three 4-minute bouts per condition. Psychophysiological responses were measured via Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and heart rate monitoring (HRmean, % time in Zone 5). Technical actions (passes, receptions, dribbles, shots) and tactical decision-making (Passing Decision-Making index) were assessed through video-based analysis. Significant interactions (p < 0.001) between field size and scoring method were found for HR measures and passing. Ball possession games showed higher HRmean and HR Zone 5 across all field sizes compared to small-goal games (p < 0.001). However, even in small-goal games, HRmean and HR Zone 5 significantly increased with larger field sizes (p < 0.001). Small-goal games resulted in more successful dribbles (p < 0.001), with fewer successful passes on the smallest field. A moderate negative correlation was observed between HRmean and successful shots (r = -0.346, p = 0.039), and between time in HR Zone 5 and the passing decision-making index (r = -0.363, p = 0.029). The study suggests that both field size and scoring method significantly influence players' physiological responses, technical performance, and decision-making. Ball possession games and larger fields increase physical intensity and passing success, while smaller fields and small-goal games promote dribbling. However, higher physiological strain appears to negatively impact shooting effectiveness and decision-making quality, although these correlations are moderate and no definitive conclusions can be drawn or generalized.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.