不同训练负荷参数对足球运动员体能适应的影响:复杂强度对适应程度的影响。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
ZhiFeng Xiong
{"title":"不同训练负荷参数对足球运动员体能适应的影响:复杂强度对适应程度的影响。","authors":"ZhiFeng Xiong","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine how physiological, locomotor, and mechanical load parameters contribute to variations in aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular adaptations in male soccer players. A 12-week cohort study was conducted involving 41 male under-17 soccer players (16.4 ± 0.5 years old). All training sessions and matches were monitored using heart rate (HR) monitors, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and a global positioning system (GPS). The following variables were recorded daily: training impulse (TRIMP), session-RPE, total distance, high speed running (14.0 to 19.9 km/h, HSR), and very high speed running (>20 km/h, VHSR), and the number of accelerations and decelerations. Physical fitness was assessed twice - at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. The assessments included aerobic capacity via the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test (YYIRT), anaerobic capacity via the mean sprint time at Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RSAmean), muscle power using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ), and sprint performance measured in a 30-meter sprint. Simple linear regressions showed that both accumulated session-RPE (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.446, β = 0.668, p < 0.001) and accumulated TRIMP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.417, β = 0.646, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of YYIRT delta, although explain less than half of variance. A multiple regression analysis revealed that accumulated VHSR significantly predicted RSAmean delta, indicating that higher VHSR values are associated with smaller and improved RSAmean (B = -0.003, p = 0.002), while HSR was not a significant predictor (p = 0.291). These findings suggest that internal load measures (session-RPE, TRIMP) are more strongly associated with aerobic adaptations, while specific external load metrics (e.g., VHSR) better explain RSA changes, highlighting the importance of modifying load monitoring strategies to the specific physiological adaptations targeted. Incorporating individualized load management based on these measures may help maximize performance improvements in practical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 3","pages":"475-484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Different Training Load Parameters on Physical Performance Adaptation in Soccer Players: How Complex Intensities Influence The Magnitude of Adaptations.\",\"authors\":\"ZhiFeng Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2025.475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine how physiological, locomotor, and mechanical load parameters contribute to variations in aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular adaptations in male soccer players. A 12-week cohort study was conducted involving 41 male under-17 soccer players (16.4 ± 0.5 years old). All training sessions and matches were monitored using heart rate (HR) monitors, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and a global positioning system (GPS). The following variables were recorded daily: training impulse (TRIMP), session-RPE, total distance, high speed running (14.0 to 19.9 km/h, HSR), and very high speed running (>20 km/h, VHSR), and the number of accelerations and decelerations. Physical fitness was assessed twice - at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. The assessments included aerobic capacity via the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test (YYIRT), anaerobic capacity via the mean sprint time at Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RSAmean), muscle power using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ), and sprint performance measured in a 30-meter sprint. Simple linear regressions showed that both accumulated session-RPE (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.446, β = 0.668, p < 0.001) and accumulated TRIMP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.417, β = 0.646, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of YYIRT delta, although explain less than half of variance. A multiple regression analysis revealed that accumulated VHSR significantly predicted RSAmean delta, indicating that higher VHSR values are associated with smaller and improved RSAmean (B = -0.003, p = 0.002), while HSR was not a significant predictor (p = 0.291). These findings suggest that internal load measures (session-RPE, TRIMP) are more strongly associated with aerobic adaptations, while specific external load metrics (e.g., VHSR) better explain RSA changes, highlighting the importance of modifying load monitoring strategies to the specific physiological adaptations targeted. Incorporating individualized load management based on these measures may help maximize performance improvements in practical contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"475-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究生理、运动和机械负荷参数如何影响男性足球运动员有氧、无氧和神经肌肉适应的变化。对41名17岁以下男性足球运动员(16.4±0.5岁)进行了为期12周的队列研究。所有的训练和比赛都使用心率(HR)监测器、感知运动评分(RPE)和全球定位系统(GPS)进行监测。每天记录以下变量:训练冲量(TRIMP),会话rpe,总距离,高速跑(14.0至19.9 km/h, HSR),超高速跑(>至20 km/h, VHSR),以及加速和减速次数。在基线和12周干预后,对身体健康进行了两次评估。评估包括通过溜溜球间歇恢复测试(YYIRT)的有氧能力,通过基于跑步的无氧冲刺测试(RSAmean)的平均冲刺时间的无氧能力,使用反动作跳跃(CMJ)的肌肉力量,以及在30米冲刺中测量的冲刺表现。简单线性回归显示,累积会话rpe (R2 = 0.446, β = 0.668, p < 0.001)和累积TRIMP (R2 = 0.417, β = 0.646, p < 0.001)是YYIRT δ的显著正预测因子,尽管解释的方差不到一半。多元回归分析显示,累积的VHSR显著预测RSAmean delta,表明VHSR值越高,RSAmean越小、越好(B = -0.003, p = 0.002),而HSR不是显著预测因子(p = 0.291)。这些发现表明,内部负荷测量(会话- rpe, TRIMP)与有氧适应的相关性更强,而特定的外部负荷指标(如VHSR)更好地解释了RSA的变化,强调了修改负荷监测策略对特定生理适应的重要性。结合基于这些措施的个性化负载管理可能有助于在实际环境中最大限度地提高性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Different Training Load Parameters on Physical Performance Adaptation in Soccer Players: How Complex Intensities Influence The Magnitude of Adaptations.

The aim of this study was to examine how physiological, locomotor, and mechanical load parameters contribute to variations in aerobic, anaerobic, and neuromuscular adaptations in male soccer players. A 12-week cohort study was conducted involving 41 male under-17 soccer players (16.4 ± 0.5 years old). All training sessions and matches were monitored using heart rate (HR) monitors, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and a global positioning system (GPS). The following variables were recorded daily: training impulse (TRIMP), session-RPE, total distance, high speed running (14.0 to 19.9 km/h, HSR), and very high speed running (>20 km/h, VHSR), and the number of accelerations and decelerations. Physical fitness was assessed twice - at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. The assessments included aerobic capacity via the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test (YYIRT), anaerobic capacity via the mean sprint time at Running-Based Anaerobic Sprint Test (RSAmean), muscle power using the Countermovement Jump (CMJ), and sprint performance measured in a 30-meter sprint. Simple linear regressions showed that both accumulated session-RPE (R2 = 0.446, β = 0.668, p < 0.001) and accumulated TRIMP (R2 = 0.417, β = 0.646, p < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of YYIRT delta, although explain less than half of variance. A multiple regression analysis revealed that accumulated VHSR significantly predicted RSAmean delta, indicating that higher VHSR values are associated with smaller and improved RSAmean (B = -0.003, p = 0.002), while HSR was not a significant predictor (p = 0.291). These findings suggest that internal load measures (session-RPE, TRIMP) are more strongly associated with aerobic adaptations, while specific external load metrics (e.g., VHSR) better explain RSA changes, highlighting the importance of modifying load monitoring strategies to the specific physiological adaptations targeted. Incorporating individualized load management based on these measures may help maximize performance improvements in practical contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信