基于一次重复最大负荷和基于身体质量负荷的后颈推举的机械输出差异。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Yi-Chien Chiang, Chieh-Ying Chiang, Timothy J Suchomel
{"title":"基于一次重复最大负荷和基于身体质量负荷的后颈推举的机械输出差异。","authors":"Yi-Chien Chiang, Chieh-Ying Chiang, Timothy J Suchomel","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2025.626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body mass (BM) can be used to prescribe loads for some weightlifting derivatives, as an alternative to the one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, the effectiveness of this method has not been investigated in weightlifting overhead pressing derivatives. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of loads determined with percentages of 1RM and BM on kinetic and kinematic characteristics in the behind-neck push jerk (BNPJ). Sixteen recreational male athletes were recruited and performed 3 repetitions of the BNPJ from 40% to 80% of their 1RM and BM, respectively. Two force plates were used to collect kinematic (peak velocity, mean velocity, phase time) and kinetic variables (peak force, mean force, peak power, mean power, and impulse) in the concentric phase. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance assessed the interaction and the main effect (approaches and intensities) on the dependent variables. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. No significant interactions existed between the approaches and intensities in all variables. The main effect approach was not significant in all the kinematic variables, but significant intensity main effects were found. Significant approach and intensity main effects were found in all kinetic variables. All kinetic variables were greater in the 1RM-based approach compared to the BM-based approach. BM can serve as a practical alternative to 1RM for load prescription in the BNPJ when targeting kinematic characteristics. However, 1RM-based loading may be more suitable for maximizing kinetic outputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"24 3","pages":"626-633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Mechanical Output between One Repetition Maximum- and Body Mass-Based Load Determination in The Behind-Neck Push Jerk.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Chien Chiang, Chieh-Ying Chiang, Timothy J Suchomel\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2025.626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Body mass (BM) can be used to prescribe loads for some weightlifting derivatives, as an alternative to the one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, the effectiveness of this method has not been investigated in weightlifting overhead pressing derivatives. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of loads determined with percentages of 1RM and BM on kinetic and kinematic characteristics in the behind-neck push jerk (BNPJ). Sixteen recreational male athletes were recruited and performed 3 repetitions of the BNPJ from 40% to 80% of their 1RM and BM, respectively. Two force plates were used to collect kinematic (peak velocity, mean velocity, phase time) and kinetic variables (peak force, mean force, peak power, mean power, and impulse) in the concentric phase. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance assessed the interaction and the main effect (approaches and intensities) on the dependent variables. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. No significant interactions existed between the approaches and intensities in all variables. The main effect approach was not significant in all the kinematic variables, but significant intensity main effects were found. Significant approach and intensity main effects were found in all kinetic variables. All kinetic variables were greater in the 1RM-based approach compared to the BM-based approach. BM can serve as a practical alternative to 1RM for load prescription in the BNPJ when targeting kinematic characteristics. However, 1RM-based loading may be more suitable for maximizing kinetic outputs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"626-633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.626\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体重(BM)可以用来规定一些举重衍生品的负荷,作为一次重复最大值(1RM)的替代方案。然而,这种方法在举重顶压衍生品中的有效性尚未得到研究。该研究的主要目的是研究以1RM和BM的百分比确定的负载对颈后推跳(BNPJ)的动力学和运动学特性的影响。招募16名休闲男性运动员,分别以40% - 80%的1RM和BM进行3次BNPJ重复。使用两个力板采集同心圆相位的运动学(峰值速度、平均速度、相时间)和动力学变量(峰值力、平均力、峰值功率、平均功率和冲量)。方差的双向重复测量分析评估了相互作用和对因变量的主要影响(方法和强度)。p≤0.05为显著性水平。在所有变量中,方法和强度之间不存在显著的相互作用。主效应方法在所有运动学变量中均不显著,但强度主效应显著。所有动力学变量均存在显著的方法和强度主效应。基于1rm的方法中所有的动力学变量都比基于bm的方法大。当瞄准运动特性时,BM可以作为BNPJ中载荷处方的1RM的实用替代方案。然而,基于1rm的加载可能更适合最大化动力学输出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Mechanical Output between One Repetition Maximum- and Body Mass-Based Load Determination in The Behind-Neck Push Jerk.

Body mass (BM) can be used to prescribe loads for some weightlifting derivatives, as an alternative to the one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, the effectiveness of this method has not been investigated in weightlifting overhead pressing derivatives. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of loads determined with percentages of 1RM and BM on kinetic and kinematic characteristics in the behind-neck push jerk (BNPJ). Sixteen recreational male athletes were recruited and performed 3 repetitions of the BNPJ from 40% to 80% of their 1RM and BM, respectively. Two force plates were used to collect kinematic (peak velocity, mean velocity, phase time) and kinetic variables (peak force, mean force, peak power, mean power, and impulse) in the concentric phase. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance assessed the interaction and the main effect (approaches and intensities) on the dependent variables. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. No significant interactions existed between the approaches and intensities in all variables. The main effect approach was not significant in all the kinematic variables, but significant intensity main effects were found. Significant approach and intensity main effects were found in all kinetic variables. All kinetic variables were greater in the 1RM-based approach compared to the BM-based approach. BM can serve as a practical alternative to 1RM for load prescription in the BNPJ when targeting kinematic characteristics. However, 1RM-based loading may be more suitable for maximizing kinetic outputs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信