超声引导下腰椎水平识别的准确性:与触诊在老年脊柱畸形患者中的比较研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Naofumi Hashiguchi, Yasushi Fujiwara, Nanoha Sato, Akiko Matsumoto, Yasushi Murakami, Shinji Kotaka, Ryo Ota, Nobuo Adachi
{"title":"超声引导下腰椎水平识别的准确性:与触诊在老年脊柱畸形患者中的比较研究。","authors":"Naofumi Hashiguchi, Yasushi Fujiwara, Nanoha Sato, Akiko Matsumoto, Yasushi Murakami, Shinji Kotaka, Ryo Ota, Nobuo Adachi","doi":"10.1007/s10396-025-01576-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of lumbar vertebral levels is crucial for the success of various interventional procedures, but conventional fluoroscopic guidance exposes both patients and physician to radiation. While ultrasound has emerged as a potential radiation-free alternative, its accuracy in elderly patients with spinal deformities remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center cross-sectional study, we compared ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided lumbar level identification in 115 patients scheduled for lumbar surgery between July 2019 and January 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to ultrasound guidance (U group, n = 57) or conventional palpation (P group, n = 58). The primary outcome measure was accuracy of vertebral level identification, verified by intraoperative fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The U group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (82.5%) compared to the P group (50.0%) (p = 0.0003, 95% CI [1.5-4.4]). Accuracy was particularly high at the L4 level (U group: 90.3%, P group: 55.9%, p = 0.0023). After adjusting for age and planned needle insertion site, ultrasound guidance maintained superior accuracy (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3-14.0, p = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound guidance provides superior accuracy in lumbar level identification compared to conventional palpation, even in elderly patients with spinal deformities. This technique may offer a reliable, radiation-free alternative, potentially reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of ultrasound-guided lumbar vertebral level identification: a comparative study with palpation in elderly patients with spinal deformities.\",\"authors\":\"Naofumi Hashiguchi, Yasushi Fujiwara, Nanoha Sato, Akiko Matsumoto, Yasushi Murakami, Shinji Kotaka, Ryo Ota, Nobuo Adachi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10396-025-01576-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of lumbar vertebral levels is crucial for the success of various interventional procedures, but conventional fluoroscopic guidance exposes both patients and physician to radiation. While ultrasound has emerged as a potential radiation-free alternative, its accuracy in elderly patients with spinal deformities remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center cross-sectional study, we compared ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided lumbar level identification in 115 patients scheduled for lumbar surgery between July 2019 and January 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to ultrasound guidance (U group, n = 57) or conventional palpation (P group, n = 58). The primary outcome measure was accuracy of vertebral level identification, verified by intraoperative fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The U group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (82.5%) compared to the P group (50.0%) (p = 0.0003, 95% CI [1.5-4.4]). Accuracy was particularly high at the L4 level (U group: 90.3%, P group: 55.9%, p = 0.0023). After adjusting for age and planned needle insertion site, ultrasound guidance maintained superior accuracy (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3-14.0, p = 0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound guidance provides superior accuracy in lumbar level identification compared to conventional palpation, even in elderly patients with spinal deformities. This technique may offer a reliable, radiation-free alternative, potentially reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-025-01576-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ultrasonics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-025-01576-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确识别腰椎椎体水平对各种介入手术的成功至关重要,但传统的透视引导使患者和医生都暴露在辐射下。虽然超声波已成为一种潜在的无辐射替代方法,但其在老年脊柱畸形患者中的准确性尚不清楚。方法:在这项单中心横断面研究中,我们比较了2019年7月至2020年1月期间计划进行腰椎手术的115例患者的超声引导和触诊引导腰椎水平识别。患者随机分为超声引导组(U组,n = 57)和常规触诊组(P组,n = 58)。主要结果测量是椎体水平识别的准确性,由术中透视检查证实。结果:U组的准确率(82.5%)明显高于P组(50.0%)(P = 0.0003, 95% CI[1.5-4.4])。在L4水平上准确率特别高(U组:90.3%,P组:55.9%,P = 0.0023)。在调整年龄和计划插针位置后,超声引导保持了较高的准确性(OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3-14.0, p = 0.0002)。结论:与常规触诊相比,超声引导在腰椎水平识别方面提供了更高的准确性,即使在患有脊柱畸形的老年患者中也是如此。这种技术可能提供一种可靠的、无辐射的替代方法,在保持高精度的同时潜在地减少辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of ultrasound-guided lumbar vertebral level identification: a comparative study with palpation in elderly patients with spinal deformities.

Purpose: Accurate identification of lumbar vertebral levels is crucial for the success of various interventional procedures, but conventional fluoroscopic guidance exposes both patients and physician to radiation. While ultrasound has emerged as a potential radiation-free alternative, its accuracy in elderly patients with spinal deformities remains unclear.

Methods: In this single-center cross-sectional study, we compared ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided lumbar level identification in 115 patients scheduled for lumbar surgery between July 2019 and January 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to ultrasound guidance (U group, n = 57) or conventional palpation (P group, n = 58). The primary outcome measure was accuracy of vertebral level identification, verified by intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Results: The U group demonstrated significantly higher accuracy (82.5%) compared to the P group (50.0%) (p = 0.0003, 95% CI [1.5-4.4]). Accuracy was particularly high at the L4 level (U group: 90.3%, P group: 55.9%, p = 0.0023). After adjusting for age and planned needle insertion site, ultrasound guidance maintained superior accuracy (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3-14.0, p = 0.0002).

Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance provides superior accuracy in lumbar level identification compared to conventional palpation, even in elderly patients with spinal deformities. This technique may offer a reliable, radiation-free alternative, potentially reducing radiation exposure while maintaining high accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Ultrasonics is the official journal of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. The main purpose of the journal is to provide forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the entire field of ultrasound in medicine and biology, encompassing both the medical and the engineering aspects of the science.The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, images, and letters to the editor.The journal also provides state-of-the-art information such as announcements from the boards and the committees of the society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信