在塞拉利昂弗里敦调查灾害风险管理和气候变化适应的有效性。

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1904
Edwin Sam-Mbomah, Ksenia Chmutina, Alister Smith, Susie Goodall, Lee Bosher
{"title":"在塞拉利昂弗里敦调查灾害风险管理和气候变化适应的有效性。","authors":"Edwin Sam-Mbomah, Ksenia Chmutina, Alister Smith, Susie Goodall, Lee Bosher","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Freetown, Sierra Leone, faces increasing risks from hazards such as floods, landslides, mudslides, fires and coastal erosion, threats that are increasingly intensified by climate change. Although disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) policies are in place, concerns persist regarding their effectiveness. This study investigates the extent to which these policies have transitioned from good intentions to effective interventions in Freetown. Employing a case study approach, the research critically examines the disaster context, reviews relevant policy frameworks and implementation processes, and identifies both enablers and barriers to effective policy execution across five informal settlements, Kroo Bay, Susans Bay, Kulvert, Kolleh Town and Dwarzack. The findings reveal systemic deficiencies in DRM and CCA, including weak legal and institutional structures, poor inter-agency coordination, inadequate enforcement, limited access to data, and ineffective risk communication. Further obstacles include insufficient community engagement, the absence of legal mechanisms for resolving DRM and CCA related disputes, corruption, political instability, underinvestment in research and technology, and inadequate urban planning. The study recommends strengthening policy and institutional frameworks, promoting integrated collaborative planning processes, and supporting community-led resilience initiatives. Key priorities include enhancing risk assessments, developing robust early warning systems (EWS), improving urban planning, and fostering innovation through research and technology.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study identifies key measures for effective DRM and CCA in Freetown, including community inclusion, capacity building, financial mechanisms, data management, risk communication, and resilient infrastructure development, especially for \"at-risk\" communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"1904"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Sam-Mbomah, Ksenia Chmutina, Alister Smith, Susie Goodall, Lee Bosher\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Freetown, Sierra Leone, faces increasing risks from hazards such as floods, landslides, mudslides, fires and coastal erosion, threats that are increasingly intensified by climate change. Although disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) policies are in place, concerns persist regarding their effectiveness. This study investigates the extent to which these policies have transitioned from good intentions to effective interventions in Freetown. Employing a case study approach, the research critically examines the disaster context, reviews relevant policy frameworks and implementation processes, and identifies both enablers and barriers to effective policy execution across five informal settlements, Kroo Bay, Susans Bay, Kulvert, Kolleh Town and Dwarzack. The findings reveal systemic deficiencies in DRM and CCA, including weak legal and institutional structures, poor inter-agency coordination, inadequate enforcement, limited access to data, and ineffective risk communication. Further obstacles include insufficient community engagement, the absence of legal mechanisms for resolving DRM and CCA related disputes, corruption, political instability, underinvestment in research and technology, and inadequate urban planning. The study recommends strengthening policy and institutional frameworks, promoting integrated collaborative planning processes, and supporting community-led resilience initiatives. Key priorities include enhancing risk assessments, developing robust early warning systems (EWS), improving urban planning, and fostering innovation through research and technology.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study identifies key measures for effective DRM and CCA in Freetown, including community inclusion, capacity building, financial mechanisms, data management, risk communication, and resilient infrastructure development, especially for \\\"at-risk\\\" communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421522/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塞拉利昂的弗里敦面临着洪水、山体滑坡、泥石流、火灾和海岸侵蚀等灾害带来的越来越大的风险,这些威胁因气候变化而日益加剧。尽管灾害风险管理(DRM)和气候变化适应(CCA)政策已经到位,但对其有效性的担忧仍然存在。本研究调查了这些政策在弗里敦从良好意图转变为有效干预的程度。本研究采用案例研究方法,对灾害背景进行了批判性考察,审查了相关政策框架和实施过程,并确定了克鲁湾、苏珊湾、库尔弗特、科勒镇和德瓦扎克五个非正式住区有效政策执行的推动因素和障碍。调查结果揭示了DRM和CCA的系统性缺陷,包括法律和制度结构薄弱、机构间协调不力、执法力度不足、数据获取有限以及风险沟通不力。进一步的障碍包括社区参与不足、缺乏解决DRM和CCA相关纠纷的法律机制、腐败、政治不稳定、研究和技术投资不足以及城市规划不足。该研究建议加强政策和体制框架,促进综合协作规划进程,并支持社区主导的抗灾能力倡议。主要优先事项包括加强风险评估、开发强有力的预警系统、改善城市规划以及通过研究和技术促进创新。贡献:该研究确定了弗里敦有效DRM和CCA的关键措施,包括社区包容、能力建设、金融机制、数据管理、风险沟通和弹性基础设施建设,特别是针对“风险”社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.

Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.

Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.

Investigating disater risk management and climate change adaptation effectiveness in freetown, Sierra Leone.

Freetown, Sierra Leone, faces increasing risks from hazards such as floods, landslides, mudslides, fires and coastal erosion, threats that are increasingly intensified by climate change. Although disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation (CCA) policies are in place, concerns persist regarding their effectiveness. This study investigates the extent to which these policies have transitioned from good intentions to effective interventions in Freetown. Employing a case study approach, the research critically examines the disaster context, reviews relevant policy frameworks and implementation processes, and identifies both enablers and barriers to effective policy execution across five informal settlements, Kroo Bay, Susans Bay, Kulvert, Kolleh Town and Dwarzack. The findings reveal systemic deficiencies in DRM and CCA, including weak legal and institutional structures, poor inter-agency coordination, inadequate enforcement, limited access to data, and ineffective risk communication. Further obstacles include insufficient community engagement, the absence of legal mechanisms for resolving DRM and CCA related disputes, corruption, political instability, underinvestment in research and technology, and inadequate urban planning. The study recommends strengthening policy and institutional frameworks, promoting integrated collaborative planning processes, and supporting community-led resilience initiatives. Key priorities include enhancing risk assessments, developing robust early warning systems (EWS), improving urban planning, and fostering innovation through research and technology.

Contribution: The study identifies key measures for effective DRM and CCA in Freetown, including community inclusion, capacity building, financial mechanisms, data management, risk communication, and resilient infrastructure development, especially for "at-risk" communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信