当前馈和反馈控制同时存在时,不确定性下的情境与瞄准。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Matthew J Crossley, Christopher L Hewitson, David M Kaplan
{"title":"当前馈和反馈控制同时存在时,不确定性下的情境与瞄准。","authors":"Matthew J Crossley, Christopher L Hewitson, David M Kaplan","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2546692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theories of human motor learning commonly assume that movement plans are adjusted in response to the sensory feedback received about their success or failure. The degree to which movement errors drive changes in feedforward motor plans is further assumed to scale inversely with sensory uncertainty. However, support for these assumptions comes primarily from experiments that limit feedback corrections during an ongoing movement. In contrast, we have recently shown that when this restriction is relaxed, a different pattern of behavior emerges. Participants gradually adjust their reaching movements in response to a perturbation from trial-to-trial, following a consistent and incremental envelope of error reduction. Riding on top of this gradual learning envelope, participants also exhibit large and abrupt changes in their initial reach direction that are strongly correlated with the uncertainty level of the sensory feedback experienced on the previous trial, but are insensitive to the size and direction of the movement error made on that trial. A class of models in which sensory uncertainty influences an aiming process best accounted for this pattern. Here, we examine the possibility that uncertainty acts as a contextual cue to shunt motor processes to one of many context-specific internal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Context Versus Aiming Under Uncertainty When Both Feedforward and Feedback Control Are Engaged.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Crossley, Christopher L Hewitson, David M Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00222895.2025.2546692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Theories of human motor learning commonly assume that movement plans are adjusted in response to the sensory feedback received about their success or failure. The degree to which movement errors drive changes in feedforward motor plans is further assumed to scale inversely with sensory uncertainty. However, support for these assumptions comes primarily from experiments that limit feedback corrections during an ongoing movement. In contrast, we have recently shown that when this restriction is relaxed, a different pattern of behavior emerges. Participants gradually adjust their reaching movements in response to a perturbation from trial-to-trial, following a consistent and incremental envelope of error reduction. Riding on top of this gradual learning envelope, participants also exhibit large and abrupt changes in their initial reach direction that are strongly correlated with the uncertainty level of the sensory feedback experienced on the previous trial, but are insensitive to the size and direction of the movement error made on that trial. A class of models in which sensory uncertainty influences an aiming process best accounted for this pattern. Here, we examine the possibility that uncertainty acts as a contextual cue to shunt motor processes to one of many context-specific internal models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2546692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2546692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类运动学习理论通常假设,运动计划是根据收到的关于成功或失败的感官反馈而调整的。运动误差驱动前馈运动计划变化的程度进一步假定与感觉不确定性成反比。然而,对这些假设的支持主要来自实验,这些实验限制了正在进行的运动中的反馈修正。相反,我们最近的研究表明,当这种限制放松时,一种不同的行为模式就会出现。参与者在一次又一次的试验中逐渐调整他们的触碰动作,以响应扰动,遵循一致和增量的误差减少包络。在这个渐进的学习包络的顶端,参与者在他们的初始到达方向上也表现出巨大而突然的变化,这与之前试验中体验到的感官反馈的不确定性水平密切相关,但对该试验中产生的运动误差的大小和方向不敏感。一类感觉不确定性影响瞄准过程的模型最好地解释了这种模式。在这里,我们研究了不确定性作为上下文提示将运动过程转移到许多特定于上下文的内部模型之一的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Context Versus Aiming Under Uncertainty When Both Feedforward and Feedback Control Are Engaged.

Theories of human motor learning commonly assume that movement plans are adjusted in response to the sensory feedback received about their success or failure. The degree to which movement errors drive changes in feedforward motor plans is further assumed to scale inversely with sensory uncertainty. However, support for these assumptions comes primarily from experiments that limit feedback corrections during an ongoing movement. In contrast, we have recently shown that when this restriction is relaxed, a different pattern of behavior emerges. Participants gradually adjust their reaching movements in response to a perturbation from trial-to-trial, following a consistent and incremental envelope of error reduction. Riding on top of this gradual learning envelope, participants also exhibit large and abrupt changes in their initial reach direction that are strongly correlated with the uncertainty level of the sensory feedback experienced on the previous trial, but are insensitive to the size and direction of the movement error made on that trial. A class of models in which sensory uncertainty influences an aiming process best accounted for this pattern. Here, we examine the possibility that uncertainty acts as a contextual cue to shunt motor processes to one of many context-specific internal models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信