对当前-未来控制和基于能力的跑步接飞球控制的统一描述。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Dees B W Postma, Frank T J M Zaal
{"title":"对当前-未来控制和基于能力的跑步接飞球控制的统一描述。","authors":"Dees B W Postma, Frank T J M Zaal","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.11.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current-future control and affordance-based control offer two distinct approaches to understanding the visual guidance of action. Current-future control strategies, such as the optical acceleration cancellation strategy, are essentially error-nulling strategies. That is, the visual guidance of action is predicated on nulling the error around the critical value of some optical invariant. Whether error nulling is (still) possible, given the action capabilities of the agent, is not specified in current-future control strategies. There is no specification of affordances. Affordance-based control resolves this issue by incorporating action capabilities into the control of action. Although promising, affordance-based control strategies have been criticized for their lack of specific predictions for the control of movement. Affordance-based control strategies are under-constrained in the sense that there is no specific control law that guides action within the space of possibilities. In this contribution, we resolve this issue by showing that current-future control and affordance-based control need not be fundamentally different and that their guiding principles can in fact be reconciled. We propose a new control strategy within the fly-ball paradigm and show its effectiveness through simulations. We show that our model makes clear predictions about the control of interceptive behavior while also informing the fielder about the catchability of fly balls.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 11","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.\",\"authors\":\"Dees B W Postma, Frank T J M Zaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.11.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current-future control and affordance-based control offer two distinct approaches to understanding the visual guidance of action. Current-future control strategies, such as the optical acceleration cancellation strategy, are essentially error-nulling strategies. That is, the visual guidance of action is predicated on nulling the error around the critical value of some optical invariant. Whether error nulling is (still) possible, given the action capabilities of the agent, is not specified in current-future control strategies. There is no specification of affordances. Affordance-based control resolves this issue by incorporating action capabilities into the control of action. Although promising, affordance-based control strategies have been criticized for their lack of specific predictions for the control of movement. Affordance-based control strategies are under-constrained in the sense that there is no specific control law that guides action within the space of possibilities. In this contribution, we resolve this issue by showing that current-future control and affordance-based control need not be fundamentally different and that their guiding principles can in fact be reconciled. We propose a new control strategy within the fly-ball paradigm and show its effectiveness through simulations. We show that our model makes clear predictions about the control of interceptive behavior while also informing the fielder about the catchability of fly balls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.11.9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.11.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前-未来控制和基于可视性的控制提供了两种不同的方法来理解行动的视觉指导。当前-未来的控制策略,如光加速度抵消策略,本质上是误差消除策略。也就是说,动作的视觉引导是基于消除某些光学不变量的临界值附近的误差。在给定代理的操作能力的情况下,是否(仍然)可能消除错误,在当前-未来控制策略中没有指定。没有对功能的说明。基于可视性的控制通过将操作功能合并到操作控制中来解决这个问题。尽管前景看好,但基于可视性的控制策略因缺乏对运动控制的具体预测而受到批评。基于可视性的控制策略在某种意义上是受限的,因为没有特定的控制法则来指导在可能性空间内的行动。在这篇文章中,我们通过展示当前-未来控制和基于能力的控制并不需要根本不同,并且它们的指导原则实际上可以协调一致,从而解决了这个问题。我们提出了一种新的飞球控制策略,并通过仿真验证了其有效性。我们表明,我们的模型对拦截行为的控制做出了明确的预测,同时也告知了外野手关于飞球的可捕获性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.

A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.

A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.

A unified account of current-future control and affordance-based control for running to catch fly balls.

Current-future control and affordance-based control offer two distinct approaches to understanding the visual guidance of action. Current-future control strategies, such as the optical acceleration cancellation strategy, are essentially error-nulling strategies. That is, the visual guidance of action is predicated on nulling the error around the critical value of some optical invariant. Whether error nulling is (still) possible, given the action capabilities of the agent, is not specified in current-future control strategies. There is no specification of affordances. Affordance-based control resolves this issue by incorporating action capabilities into the control of action. Although promising, affordance-based control strategies have been criticized for their lack of specific predictions for the control of movement. Affordance-based control strategies are under-constrained in the sense that there is no specific control law that guides action within the space of possibilities. In this contribution, we resolve this issue by showing that current-future control and affordance-based control need not be fundamentally different and that their guiding principles can in fact be reconciled. We propose a new control strategy within the fly-ball paradigm and show its effectiveness through simulations. We show that our model makes clear predictions about the control of interceptive behavior while also informing the fielder about the catchability of fly balls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信