学会延迟站立会改变感觉运动控制,但在恢复自然平衡时不会造成不稳定。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Liam H. Foulger, Xiyao Liu, Amin M. Nasrabadi, Calvin Z. Qiao, Mark G. Carpenter, Lyndia C. Wu, Jean-Sébastien Blouin
{"title":"学会延迟站立会改变感觉运动控制,但在恢复自然平衡时不会造成不稳定。","authors":"Liam H. Foulger,&nbsp;Xiyao Liu,&nbsp;Amin M. Nasrabadi,&nbsp;Calvin Z. Qiao,&nbsp;Mark G. Carpenter,&nbsp;Lyndia C. Wu,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Blouin","doi":"10.1113/JP288632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>To maintain a bipedal posture, humans must compensate for inherent sensorimotor delays from neural conduction times and electromechanical delays. Ageing and certain neurological disorders increase these delays, so it is crucial that we adapt our control of balance to compensate for the uncertainty associated with acting on sensory information from the past. Although humans can adapt to imposed delays of 400 ms, the mechanisms underlying the adaptation process remain unknown because gross balance instability or errors are absent when returning to balancing without delays. To investigate this, we used a robotic balance simulator to impose delays of 250 ms while participants balanced upright. We characterized and modelled the adjustments in motor commands required to adapt to the addition and removal of delays. Following 20 min of adaptation, participants successfully maintained their balance with the imposed delay. When the delay was abruptly removed, participants remained upright with minimal changes in their whole-body oscillations, but we observed transient (5–20 s) spectral power increases between 1 and 2 Hz in the net ankle torque and lower limb muscle activity. Our computational model revealed that increased sensorimotor gains led to spectral changes in the balance motor commands. Our results indicate that increased sensorimotor gains are necessary to adapt balance control to longer delays and that these gains remained transiently elevated after the removal of the delays without resulting in postural instability. This highlights the remarkable adaptability of human balance control, revealing that the nervous system can flexibly adjust sensorimotor strategies to maintain balance under changing conditions.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The human nervous system can adapt to sensorimotor delays, allowing us to maintain balance even though there are delays between sensed stimuli and our corrective motor actions.</li>\n \n <li>While balancing on a robotic simulator, participants exposed to a 250 ms delay between their self-generated motor commands and resulting whole-body motion exhibited initial difficulty maintaining balance and increased muscle (co)activation but adapted within minutes of exposure.</li>\n \n <li>Despite no postural instability following the abrupt removal of the 250 ms delay, participants exhibited transient (5–20 s) increases in leg muscle activation and ankle torque power (1–2 Hz).</li>\n \n <li>These changes in the neuromuscular control of balance after delay removal suggest increased sensitivity to sensory feedback, as supported by a computational model representing key physiological features of balance control.</li>\n \n <li>By revealing how the brain adapts when facing rapidly changing environments, our results highlight the flexibility of the neural control of balance to ensure robust bipedal stability.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 19","pages":"5629-5653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288632","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to stand with delays alters sensorimotor control but does not cause instability when returning to natural balance\",\"authors\":\"Liam H. Foulger,&nbsp;Xiyao Liu,&nbsp;Amin M. Nasrabadi,&nbsp;Calvin Z. Qiao,&nbsp;Mark G. Carpenter,&nbsp;Lyndia C. Wu,&nbsp;Jean-Sébastien Blouin\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/JP288632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n \\n <div>To maintain a bipedal posture, humans must compensate for inherent sensorimotor delays from neural conduction times and electromechanical delays. Ageing and certain neurological disorders increase these delays, so it is crucial that we adapt our control of balance to compensate for the uncertainty associated with acting on sensory information from the past. Although humans can adapt to imposed delays of 400 ms, the mechanisms underlying the adaptation process remain unknown because gross balance instability or errors are absent when returning to balancing without delays. To investigate this, we used a robotic balance simulator to impose delays of 250 ms while participants balanced upright. We characterized and modelled the adjustments in motor commands required to adapt to the addition and removal of delays. Following 20 min of adaptation, participants successfully maintained their balance with the imposed delay. When the delay was abruptly removed, participants remained upright with minimal changes in their whole-body oscillations, but we observed transient (5–20 s) spectral power increases between 1 and 2 Hz in the net ankle torque and lower limb muscle activity. Our computational model revealed that increased sensorimotor gains led to spectral changes in the balance motor commands. Our results indicate that increased sensorimotor gains are necessary to adapt balance control to longer delays and that these gains remained transiently elevated after the removal of the delays without resulting in postural instability. This highlights the remarkable adaptability of human balance control, revealing that the nervous system can flexibly adjust sensorimotor strategies to maintain balance under changing conditions.\\n\\n <figure>\\n <div><picture>\\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\\n </div>\\n </figure>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Key points</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>The human nervous system can adapt to sensorimotor delays, allowing us to maintain balance even though there are delays between sensed stimuli and our corrective motor actions.</li>\\n \\n <li>While balancing on a robotic simulator, participants exposed to a 250 ms delay between their self-generated motor commands and resulting whole-body motion exhibited initial difficulty maintaining balance and increased muscle (co)activation but adapted within minutes of exposure.</li>\\n \\n <li>Despite no postural instability following the abrupt removal of the 250 ms delay, participants exhibited transient (5–20 s) increases in leg muscle activation and ankle torque power (1–2 Hz).</li>\\n \\n <li>These changes in the neuromuscular control of balance after delay removal suggest increased sensitivity to sensory feedback, as supported by a computational model representing key physiological features of balance control.</li>\\n \\n <li>By revealing how the brain adapts when facing rapidly changing environments, our results highlight the flexibility of the neural control of balance to ensure robust bipedal stability.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"volume\":\"603 19\",\"pages\":\"5629-5653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP288632\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physiology-London\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288632\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP288632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了保持两足行走的姿势,人类必须补偿神经传导时间和机电延迟带来的内在感觉运动延迟。衰老和某些神经系统疾病会增加这些延迟,因此,我们必须调整我们对平衡的控制,以补偿与过去的感官信息有关的不确定性。尽管人类能够适应强加的400毫秒延迟,但适应过程的机制尚不清楚,因为在没有延迟的情况下恢复平衡时不存在总平衡不稳定性或误差。为了研究这一点,我们使用了一个机器人平衡模拟器,在参与者保持直立平衡时施加250毫秒的延迟。我们描述并模拟了运动命令的调整,以适应延迟的增加和消除。经过20分钟的适应,参与者成功地保持了对延迟的平衡。当延迟突然消除时,参与者保持直立,全身振荡变化很小,但我们观察到净踝关节扭矩和下肢肌肉活动的瞬态(5-20秒)频谱功率在1至2 Hz之间增加。我们的计算模型显示,增加的感觉运动增益导致平衡运动命令的频谱变化。我们的研究结果表明,增加的感觉运动增益对于使平衡控制适应更长的延迟是必要的,并且这些增益在消除延迟后仍会短暂升高,而不会导致姿势不稳定。这凸显了人类平衡控制的显著适应性,揭示了神经系统可以灵活调整感觉运动策略以在变化的条件下保持平衡。重点:人类神经系统可以适应感觉运动延迟,使我们能够保持平衡,即使在感觉刺激和我们的纠正运动行动之间存在延迟。在机器人模拟器上保持平衡时,参与者在自我产生的运动指令和由此产生的全身运动之间暴露于250毫秒的延迟,最初表现出维持平衡的困难,肌肉(co)激活增加,但在暴露几分钟内就适应了。尽管在突然去除250毫秒延迟后没有出现姿势不稳定,但参与者表现出腿部肌肉激活和踝关节扭矩功率(1-2 Hz)的短暂(5-20秒)增加。消除延迟后神经肌肉平衡控制的这些变化表明对感觉反馈的敏感性增加,这得到了代表平衡控制关键生理特征的计算模型的支持。通过揭示大脑在面对快速变化的环境时是如何适应的,我们的研究结果强调了神经控制平衡的灵活性,以确保强健的双足稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning to stand with delays alters sensorimotor control but does not cause instability when returning to natural balance

Learning to stand with delays alters sensorimotor control but does not cause instability when returning to natural balance
To maintain a bipedal posture, humans must compensate for inherent sensorimotor delays from neural conduction times and electromechanical delays. Ageing and certain neurological disorders increase these delays, so it is crucial that we adapt our control of balance to compensate for the uncertainty associated with acting on sensory information from the past. Although humans can adapt to imposed delays of 400 ms, the mechanisms underlying the adaptation process remain unknown because gross balance instability or errors are absent when returning to balancing without delays. To investigate this, we used a robotic balance simulator to impose delays of 250 ms while participants balanced upright. We characterized and modelled the adjustments in motor commands required to adapt to the addition and removal of delays. Following 20 min of adaptation, participants successfully maintained their balance with the imposed delay. When the delay was abruptly removed, participants remained upright with minimal changes in their whole-body oscillations, but we observed transient (5–20 s) spectral power increases between 1 and 2 Hz in the net ankle torque and lower limb muscle activity. Our computational model revealed that increased sensorimotor gains led to spectral changes in the balance motor commands. Our results indicate that increased sensorimotor gains are necessary to adapt balance control to longer delays and that these gains remained transiently elevated after the removal of the delays without resulting in postural instability. This highlights the remarkable adaptability of human balance control, revealing that the nervous system can flexibly adjust sensorimotor strategies to maintain balance under changing conditions.

Key points

  • The human nervous system can adapt to sensorimotor delays, allowing us to maintain balance even though there are delays between sensed stimuli and our corrective motor actions.
  • While balancing on a robotic simulator, participants exposed to a 250 ms delay between their self-generated motor commands and resulting whole-body motion exhibited initial difficulty maintaining balance and increased muscle (co)activation but adapted within minutes of exposure.
  • Despite no postural instability following the abrupt removal of the 250 ms delay, participants exhibited transient (5–20 s) increases in leg muscle activation and ankle torque power (1–2 Hz).
  • These changes in the neuromuscular control of balance after delay removal suggest increased sensitivity to sensory feedback, as supported by a computational model representing key physiological features of balance control.
  • By revealing how the brain adapts when facing rapidly changing environments, our results highlight the flexibility of the neural control of balance to ensure robust bipedal stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信