评价和比较线粒体调节剂(依米明)和DPP-4抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网络meta分析。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Junwei Chow, Woonling Lim, Longzhou Li, Qiuxia Yu, Yu Zhong, Zihan Wang, Syed Alfakhar Ali Shah, Chenyang Zhu, Shiwei Yan, Haiyang Liu, Xinyi Hu, Long Gao, Shan Wang, Jun Liu, Guo Ma
{"title":"评价和比较线粒体调节剂(依米明)和DPP-4抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网络meta分析。","authors":"Junwei Chow, Woonling Lim, Longzhou Li, Qiuxia Yu, Yu Zhong, Zihan Wang, Syed Alfakhar Ali Shah, Chenyang Zhu, Shiwei Yan, Haiyang Liu, Xinyi Hu, Long Gao, Shan Wang, Jun Liu, Guo Ma","doi":"10.1007/s40618-025-02655-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Imeglimin (Imeg), a novel oral antidiabetic drug that acts as a mitochondrial modulator and targets multiple metabolic pathways, offers a novel therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although both Imeg and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), their comparative clinical benefits remain uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of Imeg and DPP-4i in the treatment of T2DM using Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 1 October, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of Imeg or DPP-4i with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs in treating T2DM were included. The primary efficacy outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hours postprandial plasma glucose (2h PPG), as well as the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7%. The secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in body weight (BW), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The safety outcomes included the proportion of participants with adverse events, infection, and gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 studies with 71,476 participants were included in the BNMA. Imeg 500 mg,1000 mg, 1500 mg and 2000 mg BID all exhibited significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)], -0.29 [-0.51, -0.06] %, -0.67 [-0.83, -0.51] %, -0.73 [-0.90, -0.56] %, and - 0.63 [-0.95, -0.30] %, respectively). Compared to placebo, the majority of DPP-4i (except for Gosogliptin (Goso) 2 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -0.32 [-0.73, 0.09] %), Omarigliptin 0.25 mg QW (-0.26 [-0.54, 0.01] %), and Sitagliptin (Sita) 5 mg BID (-0.24 [-0.50, 0.01] %)) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c. Compared to the FDA-approved DPP-4i, i.e., Sita 100 mg QD, Saxagliptin 5 mg QD, Linagliptin 5 mg QD, and Alogliptin (Alog) 25 mg QD, Imeg showed no significant differences in glycemic control. Compared to placebo, Alog 50 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -11.15 [-19.99, -2.48] mg/dL), Alog 25 mg QD (-6.11 [-10.33, -2.07] mg/dL), and Alog 12.5 mg QD (-5.53 [-9.72, -1.49] mg/dL) exhibited notable total cholesterol-lowering effects. Compared to placebo, only Alog 50 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.91 [1.02, 3.28]) and Goso 30 mg QD (2.14 [1.07, 3.86]) exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events. Compared to placebo, only Imeg 500 mg BID was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR [95% CI], 2.30 [1.01, 4.61]). Compared to placebo, Imeg 1500 mg BID (OR [95% CI], 2.74 [1.09, 5.78]), Sita 100 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.36 [1.02, 1.75]) and Vildagliptin 50 mg BID (1.50 [1.06, 2.06]) were associated with a significantly increased risk of GIAEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, among the included DPP-4i, 20 mg QD and 40 mg QD of Teneligliptin (Tene) demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering HbA1c (73.08% and 84.8%, respectively) and 2h PPG (68.05% and 79.24%, respectively). Alog 25 mg QD was identified as the most effective DPP-4i for increasing the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7% (91.07%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Imeg and DPP-4i demonstrated favorable antidiabetic effects and good safety. Imeg exhibited comparable glycemic control to that of DPP-4i. Overall, Alog was the most suitable option among the included DPP-4i for T2DM patients with hyperlipidemia. Tene demonstrated significant efficacy in glycemic control, and can be a first-line choice among the included DPP-4i.</p>","PeriodicalId":48802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endocrinological Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and comparison of efficacy and safety of mitochondrial modulator (Imeglimin) and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Junwei Chow, Woonling Lim, Longzhou Li, Qiuxia Yu, Yu Zhong, Zihan Wang, Syed Alfakhar Ali Shah, Chenyang Zhu, Shiwei Yan, Haiyang Liu, Xinyi Hu, Long Gao, Shan Wang, Jun Liu, Guo Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40618-025-02655-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Imeglimin (Imeg), a novel oral antidiabetic drug that acts as a mitochondrial modulator and targets multiple metabolic pathways, offers a novel therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although both Imeg and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), their comparative clinical benefits remain uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of Imeg and DPP-4i in the treatment of T2DM using Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 1 October, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of Imeg or DPP-4i with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs in treating T2DM were included. The primary efficacy outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hours postprandial plasma glucose (2h PPG), as well as the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7%. The secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in body weight (BW), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The safety outcomes included the proportion of participants with adverse events, infection, and gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>145 studies with 71,476 participants were included in the BNMA. Imeg 500 mg,1000 mg, 1500 mg and 2000 mg BID all exhibited significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)], -0.29 [-0.51, -0.06] %, -0.67 [-0.83, -0.51] %, -0.73 [-0.90, -0.56] %, and - 0.63 [-0.95, -0.30] %, respectively). Compared to placebo, the majority of DPP-4i (except for Gosogliptin (Goso) 2 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -0.32 [-0.73, 0.09] %), Omarigliptin 0.25 mg QW (-0.26 [-0.54, 0.01] %), and Sitagliptin (Sita) 5 mg BID (-0.24 [-0.50, 0.01] %)) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c. Compared to the FDA-approved DPP-4i, i.e., Sita 100 mg QD, Saxagliptin 5 mg QD, Linagliptin 5 mg QD, and Alogliptin (Alog) 25 mg QD, Imeg showed no significant differences in glycemic control. Compared to placebo, Alog 50 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -11.15 [-19.99, -2.48] mg/dL), Alog 25 mg QD (-6.11 [-10.33, -2.07] mg/dL), and Alog 12.5 mg QD (-5.53 [-9.72, -1.49] mg/dL) exhibited notable total cholesterol-lowering effects. Compared to placebo, only Alog 50 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.91 [1.02, 3.28]) and Goso 30 mg QD (2.14 [1.07, 3.86]) exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events. Compared to placebo, only Imeg 500 mg BID was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR [95% CI], 2.30 [1.01, 4.61]). Compared to placebo, Imeg 1500 mg BID (OR [95% CI], 2.74 [1.09, 5.78]), Sita 100 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.36 [1.02, 1.75]) and Vildagliptin 50 mg BID (1.50 [1.06, 2.06]) were associated with a significantly increased risk of GIAEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, among the included DPP-4i, 20 mg QD and 40 mg QD of Teneligliptin (Tene) demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering HbA1c (73.08% and 84.8%, respectively) and 2h PPG (68.05% and 79.24%, respectively). Alog 25 mg QD was identified as the most effective DPP-4i for increasing the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7% (91.07%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Imeg and DPP-4i demonstrated favorable antidiabetic effects and good safety. Imeg exhibited comparable glycemic control to that of DPP-4i. Overall, Alog was the most suitable option among the included DPP-4i for T2DM patients with hyperlipidemia. Tene demonstrated significant efficacy in glycemic control, and can be a first-line choice among the included DPP-4i.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endocrinological Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endocrinological Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-025-02655-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endocrinological Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-025-02655-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Imeglimin (Imeg)是一种新型口服降糖药,可作为线粒体调节剂并靶向多种代谢途径,为2型糖尿病(T2DM)提供了一种新的治疗选择。尽管Imeg和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)都能增强葡萄糖刺激胰岛素分泌(GSIS),但它们的比较临床益处仍不确定。因此,我们采用贝叶斯网络meta分析(BNMA)对Imeg和DPP-4i治疗T2DM的疗效和安全性进行了综合评价和比较。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间为数据库成立至2024年10月1日。纳入了比较Imeg或DPP-4i与安慰剂或其他降糖药治疗T2DM的疗效和安全性的随机临床试验(rct)。主要疗效指标包括糖化血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)和餐后2小时血糖(2h PPG)的变化,以及HbA1c患者比例的变化。结果:145项研究,71476名参与者纳入了BNMA。与安慰剂相比,Imeg 500 mg、1000 mg、1500 mg和2000 mg BID在降低HbA1c方面均表现出显著疗效(平均差值(MD)[95%可信区间(CI)],分别为-0.29[-0.51,-0.06]%、-0.67[-0.83,-0.51]%、-0.73[-0.90,-0.56]%和- 0.63[-0.95,-0.30]%)。与安慰剂相比,大多数DPP-4i(除了gosoglitin (Goso) 2mg QD (MD [95% CI], -0.32 [-0.73, 0.09] %), Omarigliptin(-0.26[-0.54, 0.01] %)和Sitagliptin (Sita) 5mg BID(-0.24[-0.50, 0.01] %)显示出显著的降低HbA1c的疗效。与fda批准的DPP-4i,即Sita 100 mg QD、沙格列汀5 mg QD、利格列汀5 mg QD、阿格列汀(Alog) 25 mg QD相比,Imeg在血糖控制方面无显著差异。与安慰剂相比,Alog 50 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -11.15 [-19.99, -2.48] mg/dL)、Alog 25 mg QD (-6.11 [-10.33, -2.07] mg/dL)和Alog 12.5 mg QD (-5.53 [-9.72, -1.49] mg/dL)表现出显著的总胆固醇降低作用。与安慰剂相比,只有Alog 50 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.91[1.02, 3.28])和Goso 30 mg QD(2.14[1.07, 3.86])表现出更高的不良事件发生率。与安慰剂相比,只有Imeg 500 mg BID与感染风险显著增加相关(OR [95% CI], 2.30[1.01, 4.61])。与安慰剂相比,Imeg 1500mg BID (OR [95% CI], 2.74[1.09, 5.78])、Sita 100mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.36[1.02, 1.75])和Vildagliptin 50mg BID(1.50[1.06, 2.06])与giae的风险显著增加相关。从累积排序曲线下曲面(SUCRA)值来看,在纳入的DPP-4i中,20 mg QD和40 mg QD的Teneligliptin (Tene)降低HbA1c(分别为73.08%和84.8%)和2h PPG(分别为68.05%和79.24%)的效果显著。结论:Imeg和DPP-4i具有良好的降糖作用,且具有良好的安全性。Imeg的血糖控制效果与DPP-4i相当。总的来说,在纳入的DPP-4i中,Alog是T2DM合并高脂血症患者最合适的选择。Tene在血糖控制方面表现出显著的疗效,可以作为纳入DPP-4i的一线选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and comparison of efficacy and safety of mitochondrial modulator (Imeglimin) and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Purpose: Imeglimin (Imeg), a novel oral antidiabetic drug that acts as a mitochondrial modulator and targets multiple metabolic pathways, offers a novel therapeutic option for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although both Imeg and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), their comparative clinical benefits remain uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of Imeg and DPP-4i in the treatment of T2DM using Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA).

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to 1 October, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of Imeg or DPP-4i with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs in treating T2DM were included. The primary efficacy outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hours postprandial plasma glucose (2h PPG), as well as the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7%. The secondary efficacy outcomes included changes in body weight (BW), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β), and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). The safety outcomes included the proportion of participants with adverse events, infection, and gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs).

Results: 145 studies with 71,476 participants were included in the BNMA. Imeg 500 mg,1000 mg, 1500 mg and 2000 mg BID all exhibited significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval (CI)], -0.29 [-0.51, -0.06] %, -0.67 [-0.83, -0.51] %, -0.73 [-0.90, -0.56] %, and - 0.63 [-0.95, -0.30] %, respectively). Compared to placebo, the majority of DPP-4i (except for Gosogliptin (Goso) 2 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -0.32 [-0.73, 0.09] %), Omarigliptin 0.25 mg QW (-0.26 [-0.54, 0.01] %), and Sitagliptin (Sita) 5 mg BID (-0.24 [-0.50, 0.01] %)) demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing HbA1c. Compared to the FDA-approved DPP-4i, i.e., Sita 100 mg QD, Saxagliptin 5 mg QD, Linagliptin 5 mg QD, and Alogliptin (Alog) 25 mg QD, Imeg showed no significant differences in glycemic control. Compared to placebo, Alog 50 mg QD (MD [95% CI], -11.15 [-19.99, -2.48] mg/dL), Alog 25 mg QD (-6.11 [-10.33, -2.07] mg/dL), and Alog 12.5 mg QD (-5.53 [-9.72, -1.49] mg/dL) exhibited notable total cholesterol-lowering effects. Compared to placebo, only Alog 50 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.91 [1.02, 3.28]) and Goso 30 mg QD (2.14 [1.07, 3.86]) exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events. Compared to placebo, only Imeg 500 mg BID was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR [95% CI], 2.30 [1.01, 4.61]). Compared to placebo, Imeg 1500 mg BID (OR [95% CI], 2.74 [1.09, 5.78]), Sita 100 mg QD (OR [95% CI], 1.36 [1.02, 1.75]) and Vildagliptin 50 mg BID (1.50 [1.06, 2.06]) were associated with a significantly increased risk of GIAEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value, among the included DPP-4i, 20 mg QD and 40 mg QD of Teneligliptin (Tene) demonstrated significant efficacy in lowering HbA1c (73.08% and 84.8%, respectively) and 2h PPG (68.05% and 79.24%, respectively). Alog 25 mg QD was identified as the most effective DPP-4i for increasing the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7% (91.07%).

Conclusion: Imeg and DPP-4i demonstrated favorable antidiabetic effects and good safety. Imeg exhibited comparable glycemic control to that of DPP-4i. Overall, Alog was the most suitable option among the included DPP-4i for T2DM patients with hyperlipidemia. Tene demonstrated significant efficacy in glycemic control, and can be a first-line choice among the included DPP-4i.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endocrinological Investigation is a well-established, e-only endocrine journal founded 36 years ago in 1978. It is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), established in 1964. Other Italian societies in the endocrinology and metabolism field are affiliated to the journal: Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine, Italian Society of Obesity, Italian Society of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Clinical Endocrinologists’ Association, Thyroid Association, Endocrine Surgical Units Association, Italian Society of Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信