晚期淋巴瘤患者的预后讨论:特点和挑战。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Meghan McDarby, Jaime Gilliland, Rinchen Dolma, Sarah C Rutherford, Peter Martin, Holly Prigerson, Kelly M McConnell
{"title":"晚期淋巴瘤患者的预后讨论:特点和挑战。","authors":"Meghan McDarby, Jaime Gilliland, Rinchen Dolma, Sarah C Rutherford, Peter Martin, Holly Prigerson, Kelly M McConnell","doi":"10.1017/S147895152510059X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prognostic discussions are critical in the care of patients with advanced lymphoma, given the disease's complexity, rapidly evolving treatments, and shifting potential for cure. However, previous research has paid limited attention to how these discussions unfold from both patient and clinician perspectives, particularly in the context of early conversations. The current study sought to identify key experiences that inform improvements in clinician communication and patient understanding of prognosis for patients with advanced lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study from July 2023 to June 2024 with 19 patients diagnosed with advanced lymphoma and 3 oncologists. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and emergent themes were identified through consensus among a trained coding team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two primary themes emerged. First, patients recalled early prognostic conversations as highly focused on curative intent. Second, oncologists cited incomplete diagnostic data and concerns about overwhelming patients as reasons for limiting early discussions, often delaying deeper prognostic conversations. Clinicians reported tension between maintaining patient hope and providing comprehensive information about disease trajectory and treatment uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Findings highlight a need for communication strategies that balance hope with realism in early prognostic discussions for patients with advanced lymphoma. Oncologists may benefit from structured, evidence-based guidance to manage information delivery over time, particularly in the face of diagnostic ambiguity. Future research should prioritize inclusive sampling and explore timing and content of ongoing prognostic discussions to better support informed decision-making and goal-concordant care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"e164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic discussions in patients with advanced lymphoma: Characteristics and challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan McDarby, Jaime Gilliland, Rinchen Dolma, Sarah C Rutherford, Peter Martin, Holly Prigerson, Kelly M McConnell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S147895152510059X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Prognostic discussions are critical in the care of patients with advanced lymphoma, given the disease's complexity, rapidly evolving treatments, and shifting potential for cure. However, previous research has paid limited attention to how these discussions unfold from both patient and clinician perspectives, particularly in the context of early conversations. The current study sought to identify key experiences that inform improvements in clinician communication and patient understanding of prognosis for patients with advanced lymphoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study from July 2023 to June 2024 with 19 patients diagnosed with advanced lymphoma and 3 oncologists. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and emergent themes were identified through consensus among a trained coding team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two primary themes emerged. First, patients recalled early prognostic conversations as highly focused on curative intent. Second, oncologists cited incomplete diagnostic data and concerns about overwhelming patients as reasons for limiting early discussions, often delaying deeper prognostic conversations. Clinicians reported tension between maintaining patient hope and providing comprehensive information about disease trajectory and treatment uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Findings highlight a need for communication strategies that balance hope with realism in early prognostic discussions for patients with advanced lymphoma. Oncologists may benefit from structured, evidence-based guidance to manage information delivery over time, particularly in the face of diagnostic ambiguity. Future research should prioritize inclusive sampling and explore timing and content of ongoing prognostic discussions to better support informed decision-making and goal-concordant care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"e164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative & Supportive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152510059X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152510059X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到疾病的复杂性、快速发展的治疗方法和不断变化的治愈潜力,预后讨论在晚期淋巴瘤患者的护理中至关重要。然而,以前的研究很少关注这些讨论是如何从患者和临床医生的角度展开的,特别是在早期对话的背景下。目前的研究旨在确定关键经验,为改善临床医生沟通和患者对晚期淋巴瘤患者预后的理解提供信息。方法:我们于2023年7月至2024年6月对19例诊断为晚期淋巴瘤的患者和3名肿瘤学家进行定性研究。使用主题内容分析分析半结构化访谈记录,并通过训练有素的编码团队之间的共识确定紧急主题。结果:出现了两个主要主题。首先,患者回忆起早期预后对话高度关注治疗意图。其次,肿瘤学家将不完整的诊断数据和对患者数量庞大的担忧作为限制早期讨论的理由,这往往会推迟更深层次的预后对话。临床医生报告了维持病人希望和提供有关疾病轨迹和治疗不确定性的全面信息之间的紧张关系。结果的意义:研究结果强调了在晚期淋巴瘤患者早期预后讨论中需要沟通策略,以平衡希望与现实。肿瘤学家可以从结构化的、基于证据的指导中获益,以管理信息的传递,特别是在面对诊断不明确的情况下。未来的研究应优先考虑包容性抽样,并探索正在进行的预后讨论的时间和内容,以更好地支持知情决策和目标一致的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic discussions in patients with advanced lymphoma: Characteristics and challenges.

Objectives: Prognostic discussions are critical in the care of patients with advanced lymphoma, given the disease's complexity, rapidly evolving treatments, and shifting potential for cure. However, previous research has paid limited attention to how these discussions unfold from both patient and clinician perspectives, particularly in the context of early conversations. The current study sought to identify key experiences that inform improvements in clinician communication and patient understanding of prognosis for patients with advanced lymphoma.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study from July 2023 to June 2024 with 19 patients diagnosed with advanced lymphoma and 3 oncologists. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and emergent themes were identified through consensus among a trained coding team.

Results: Two primary themes emerged. First, patients recalled early prognostic conversations as highly focused on curative intent. Second, oncologists cited incomplete diagnostic data and concerns about overwhelming patients as reasons for limiting early discussions, often delaying deeper prognostic conversations. Clinicians reported tension between maintaining patient hope and providing comprehensive information about disease trajectory and treatment uncertainty.

Significance of results: Findings highlight a need for communication strategies that balance hope with realism in early prognostic discussions for patients with advanced lymphoma. Oncologists may benefit from structured, evidence-based guidance to manage information delivery over time, particularly in the face of diagnostic ambiguity. Future research should prioritize inclusive sampling and explore timing and content of ongoing prognostic discussions to better support informed decision-making and goal-concordant care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信