支气管动脉栓塞后咯血复发的危险因素及患者反馈。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Bo Yang, Awei Huo, Ling Li, Huaiming Qiu
{"title":"支气管动脉栓塞后咯血复发的危险因素及患者反馈。","authors":"Bo Yang, Awei Huo, Ling Li, Huaiming Qiu","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for recurrence of hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization and to evaluate patient feedbacks on this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2013 and October 2022, a total of 122 patients (83 males, 39 females; mean age: 59.7±17.3 years; range, 13 to 91 years) who underwent bronchial artery embolization were retrospectively analyzed. The endpoint event was hemoptysis recurrence or death. Baseline data of the patients, technical and clinical success rates, complications, postoperative recovery time in hospital and patient satisfaction and re-acceptance rates were evaluated via a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, 24 patients died. A total of 50 patients experienced recurrence, and the overall recurrence rate was 40.98%. Patients with embolization of single culprit artery had a higher recurrence-free survival rate (p=0.049). Of 97 respondents, 81 were satisfied with the result of the procedure and 84 gave consent for re-intervention, if necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bronchial artery embolization is a safe and effective method of hemoptysis suppression, particularly for those with embolization of single culprit artery. Better suppression of hemoptysis and strengthening communication with patients in the perioperative period can improve the patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"33 3","pages":"357-364"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors of hemoptysis recurrence after bronchial artery embolization and patient feedbacks.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Yang, Awei Huo, Ling Li, Huaiming Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for recurrence of hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization and to evaluate patient feedbacks on this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2013 and October 2022, a total of 122 patients (83 males, 39 females; mean age: 59.7±17.3 years; range, 13 to 91 years) who underwent bronchial artery embolization were retrospectively analyzed. The endpoint event was hemoptysis recurrence or death. Baseline data of the patients, technical and clinical success rates, complications, postoperative recovery time in hospital and patient satisfaction and re-acceptance rates were evaluated via a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, 24 patients died. A total of 50 patients experienced recurrence, and the overall recurrence rate was 40.98%. Patients with embolization of single culprit artery had a higher recurrence-free survival rate (p=0.049). Of 97 respondents, 81 were satisfied with the result of the procedure and 84 gave consent for re-intervention, if necessary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bronchial artery embolization is a safe and effective method of hemoptysis suppression, particularly for those with embolization of single culprit artery. Better suppression of hemoptysis and strengthening communication with patients in the perioperative period can improve the patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"357-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421540/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2025.27140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是确定支气管动脉栓塞后咯血复发的危险因素,并评估患者对该干预措施的反馈。方法:回顾性分析2013年8月~ 2022年10月行支气管动脉栓塞术的122例患者,其中男83例,女39例,平均年龄59.7±17.3岁,年龄范围13 ~ 91岁。终点事件为咯血复发或死亡。通过问卷调查评估患者的基线数据、技术和临床成功率、并发症、术后住院恢复时间以及患者满意度和再接受率。结果:随访期间死亡24例。50例患者复发,总复发率为40.98%。单罪魁动脉栓塞患者无复发生存率较高(p=0.049)。在97名受访者中,81人对治疗结果感到满意,84人同意在必要时再次干预。结论:支气管动脉栓塞是一种安全有效的抑制咯血的方法,尤其对单罪魁动脉栓塞者更为有效。围手术期更好的抑制咯血,加强与患者的沟通,可提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk factors of hemoptysis recurrence after bronchial artery embolization and patient feedbacks.

Risk factors of hemoptysis recurrence after bronchial artery embolization and patient feedbacks.

Risk factors of hemoptysis recurrence after bronchial artery embolization and patient feedbacks.

Risk factors of hemoptysis recurrence after bronchial artery embolization and patient feedbacks.

Background: The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for recurrence of hemoptysis after bronchial artery embolization and to evaluate patient feedbacks on this intervention.

Methods: Between August 2013 and October 2022, a total of 122 patients (83 males, 39 females; mean age: 59.7±17.3 years; range, 13 to 91 years) who underwent bronchial artery embolization were retrospectively analyzed. The endpoint event was hemoptysis recurrence or death. Baseline data of the patients, technical and clinical success rates, complications, postoperative recovery time in hospital and patient satisfaction and re-acceptance rates were evaluated via a questionnaire.

Results: During follow-up, 24 patients died. A total of 50 patients experienced recurrence, and the overall recurrence rate was 40.98%. Patients with embolization of single culprit artery had a higher recurrence-free survival rate (p=0.049). Of 97 respondents, 81 were satisfied with the result of the procedure and 84 gave consent for re-intervention, if necessary.

Conclusion: Bronchial artery embolization is a safe and effective method of hemoptysis suppression, particularly for those with embolization of single culprit artery. Better suppression of hemoptysis and strengthening communication with patients in the perioperative period can improve the patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信