{"title":"肩外展对斜角间三角解剖的影响。","authors":"Abbie Randall, Steven Buddle","doi":"10.1002/ca.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) occurs in three major anatomical locations, including the interscalene triangle. Because symptoms of TOS are reproduced on upper limb abduction, this study aimed to examine the impact of glenohumeral abduction on the triangle's dimensions and whether this may contribute to compression of the structures which traverse it. Ten interscalene triangles were dissected from five body donor specimens bilaterally to measure the length of the anterior and middle scalene muscles, and inferior border of the scalene triangle when the upper limb was abducted to 0°, 90°, and at maximal abduction. Both the anterior and middle scalene lengths decreased as the angle of abduction increased, with the greatest decrease being between 0° and 90° (p = 0.0003). No significant decrease in length was shown between 90° and > 90° abduction (p = 0.48) nor was there a significant change in the overall area of the triangle throughout abduction (p = 0.58). This suggests that TOS symptoms may not correlate with the degree of upper limb abduction as previously thought. Additionally, there were significant differences between parameters of the superficial triangle measured by most previous studies, and a deeper triangle within the same space at all levels of abduction. This study therefore recommends further exploration into the dynamic nature of the interscalene triangle.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Shoulder Abduction on the Anatomy of the Interscalene Triangle.\",\"authors\":\"Abbie Randall, Steven Buddle\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ca.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) occurs in three major anatomical locations, including the interscalene triangle. Because symptoms of TOS are reproduced on upper limb abduction, this study aimed to examine the impact of glenohumeral abduction on the triangle's dimensions and whether this may contribute to compression of the structures which traverse it. Ten interscalene triangles were dissected from five body donor specimens bilaterally to measure the length of the anterior and middle scalene muscles, and inferior border of the scalene triangle when the upper limb was abducted to 0°, 90°, and at maximal abduction. Both the anterior and middle scalene lengths decreased as the angle of abduction increased, with the greatest decrease being between 0° and 90° (p = 0.0003). No significant decrease in length was shown between 90° and > 90° abduction (p = 0.48) nor was there a significant change in the overall area of the triangle throughout abduction (p = 0.58). This suggests that TOS symptoms may not correlate with the degree of upper limb abduction as previously thought. Additionally, there were significant differences between parameters of the superficial triangle measured by most previous studies, and a deeper triangle within the same space at all levels of abduction. This study therefore recommends further exploration into the dynamic nature of the interscalene triangle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Shoulder Abduction on the Anatomy of the Interscalene Triangle.
Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) occurs in three major anatomical locations, including the interscalene triangle. Because symptoms of TOS are reproduced on upper limb abduction, this study aimed to examine the impact of glenohumeral abduction on the triangle's dimensions and whether this may contribute to compression of the structures which traverse it. Ten interscalene triangles were dissected from five body donor specimens bilaterally to measure the length of the anterior and middle scalene muscles, and inferior border of the scalene triangle when the upper limb was abducted to 0°, 90°, and at maximal abduction. Both the anterior and middle scalene lengths decreased as the angle of abduction increased, with the greatest decrease being between 0° and 90° (p = 0.0003). No significant decrease in length was shown between 90° and > 90° abduction (p = 0.48) nor was there a significant change in the overall area of the triangle throughout abduction (p = 0.58). This suggests that TOS symptoms may not correlate with the degree of upper limb abduction as previously thought. Additionally, there were significant differences between parameters of the superficial triangle measured by most previous studies, and a deeper triangle within the same space at all levels of abduction. This study therefore recommends further exploration into the dynamic nature of the interscalene triangle.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.