亚成年个体骨骼性别诊断方法的验证:使用中世纪骨骼系列Creuߥn,德国的比较研究。

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Yannick Ahlbrecht, Anna Bretschneider, Janine Mazanec, Birgit Grosskopf
{"title":"亚成年个体骨骼性别诊断方法的验证:使用中世纪骨骼系列Creuߥn,德国的比较研究。","authors":"Yannick Ahlbrecht, Anna Bretschneider, Janine Mazanec, Birgit Grosskopf","doi":"10.1127/anthranz/1843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> Evaluation and verification of morphological and osteometric methods for the sex diagnosis of skeletons of subadult individuals by comparison with molecular genetic sex determinations. <i>Material:</i> 53 individuals (almost exclusively subadult individuals) buried in a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. <i>Methods:</i> Morphological methods referring to the morphology of the pelvis, mandible and <i>facies auricularis</i>, an osteometric method on the pelvis and molecular genetic sex determination by the detection of X- and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs). <i>Results:</i> None of the morphological and metric characteristics tested achieved the required minimum assurance level of 75%. <i>Conclusions:</i> None of the tested methods is a reliable criterion for determining the sex of subadult individuals of the studied skeletal series. <i>Significance:</i> In the literature, morphological sex diagnosis on childrens skeletons is repeatedly criticised, but is a common subject of anthropological investigation. In this paper, once again, attention is drawn to the unreliability of the methods, using the skeletal remains from a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. <i>Limitations:</i> The study is limited to the skeletal series presented in this paper and cannot automatically be applied to other skeletal series. Other series from different geographical locations or chronological classifications could lead to different results. <i>Suggestions for further research:</i> Critical consideration of morphological and osteometric sex diagnosis in skeletons of other subadult individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46008,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of sex diagnosis methods in skeletons of subadult individuals: a comparative study using the medieval skeletal series Creußen, Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Ahlbrecht, Anna Bretschneider, Janine Mazanec, Birgit Grosskopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1127/anthranz/1843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> Evaluation and verification of morphological and osteometric methods for the sex diagnosis of skeletons of subadult individuals by comparison with molecular genetic sex determinations. <i>Material:</i> 53 individuals (almost exclusively subadult individuals) buried in a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. <i>Methods:</i> Morphological methods referring to the morphology of the pelvis, mandible and <i>facies auricularis</i>, an osteometric method on the pelvis and molecular genetic sex determination by the detection of X- and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs). <i>Results:</i> None of the morphological and metric characteristics tested achieved the required minimum assurance level of 75%. <i>Conclusions:</i> None of the tested methods is a reliable criterion for determining the sex of subadult individuals of the studied skeletal series. <i>Significance:</i> In the literature, morphological sex diagnosis on childrens skeletons is repeatedly criticised, but is a common subject of anthropological investigation. In this paper, once again, attention is drawn to the unreliability of the methods, using the skeletal remains from a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. <i>Limitations:</i> The study is limited to the skeletal series presented in this paper and cannot automatically be applied to other skeletal series. Other series from different geographical locations or chronological classifications could lead to different results. <i>Suggestions for further research:</i> Critical consideration of morphological and osteometric sex diagnosis in skeletons of other subadult individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropologischer Anzeiger\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropologischer Anzeiger\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/1843\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologischer Anzeiger","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/anthranz/1843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过与分子遗传性别测定的比较,评价和验证亚成年个体骨骼性别诊断的形态学和骨测量方法。资料:53个个体(几乎全部是亚成年个体)被埋葬在德国Creuߥn的一个中世纪集体墓穴中。方法:形态学方法参考骨盆、下颌骨和耳廓相的形态学,骨盆骨测量法和X染色体和y染色体短串联重复序列(STRs)检测的分子遗传性别测定。结果:形态学和计量学特征均未达到75%的最低保证水平。结论:没有一种测试方法是确定研究骨骼系列的亚成年个体性别的可靠标准。意义:在文献中,对儿童骨骼的形态性别诊断屡遭批评,但却是人类学研究的共同课题。在这篇论文中,人们再次注意到这些方法的不可靠性,使用了来自德国Creuߥ的中世纪乱葬坑的骨骼遗骸。局限性:本研究仅限于本文提出的骨骼系列,不能自动应用于其他骨骼系列。来自不同地理位置或时间分类的其他系列可能导致不同的结果。对进一步研究的建议:对其他亚成年个体骨骼的形态学和骨计量学性别诊断的批判性考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verification of sex diagnosis methods in skeletons of subadult individuals: a comparative study using the medieval skeletal series Creußen, Germany.

Objective: Evaluation and verification of morphological and osteometric methods for the sex diagnosis of skeletons of subadult individuals by comparison with molecular genetic sex determinations. Material: 53 individuals (almost exclusively subadult individuals) buried in a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. Methods: Morphological methods referring to the morphology of the pelvis, mandible and facies auricularis, an osteometric method on the pelvis and molecular genetic sex determination by the detection of X- and Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (STRs). Results: None of the morphological and metric characteristics tested achieved the required minimum assurance level of 75%. Conclusions: None of the tested methods is a reliable criterion for determining the sex of subadult individuals of the studied skeletal series. Significance: In the literature, morphological sex diagnosis on childrens skeletons is repeatedly criticised, but is a common subject of anthropological investigation. In this paper, once again, attention is drawn to the unreliability of the methods, using the skeletal remains from a medieval mass grave in Creuߥn, Germany. Limitations: The study is limited to the skeletal series presented in this paper and cannot automatically be applied to other skeletal series. Other series from different geographical locations or chronological classifications could lead to different results. Suggestions for further research: Critical consideration of morphological and osteometric sex diagnosis in skeletons of other subadult individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: AA is an international journal of human biology. It publishes original research papers on all fields of human biological research, that is, on all aspects, theoretical and practical of studies of human variability, including application of molecular methods and their tangents to cultural and social anthropology. Other than research papers, AA invites the submission of case studies, reviews, technical notes and short reports. AA is available online, papers must be submitted online to ensure rapid review and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信