加强护理教育理论评估设计:推进可持续发展目标4。

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2025-08-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061
Gabieba Donough, Katlego Mthimunye, Felicity Daniels
{"title":"加强护理教育理论评估设计:推进可持续发展目标4。","authors":"Gabieba Donough, Katlego Mthimunye, Felicity Daniels","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality theoretical assessments in nursing education are essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 (ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all). However, misalignment with National Qualification Framework (NQF) standards, an overreliance on recall-based questions and inadequate educator training undermine the fairness of assessments and students' ability to demonstrate clinical competence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explores theoretical assessment design in nursing education, evaluating its alignment with NQF standards, competency-based assessments and Sustainable Development Goal 4.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Conducted at a South African nursing school offering undergraduate nursing programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multimethod approach integrated educator interviews, document reviews of moderation reports, a scoping review and a student survey to investigate assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While educators valued Bloom's Taxonomy, over-reliance on recall-based questions limited critical thinking, clinical decision-making and competency development. Misalignment with NQF standards caused inconsistencies in cognitive demand, while gaps in moderation processes impacted assessment validity and fairness. Educators faced challenges because of limited training and support, and students struggled with ambiguous and linguistically complex assessments that hindered their ability to demonstrate competency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strengthening assessment design, moderation and educator training is essential to improving competency-based assessment practices in nursing education. Policy reforms promoting fair, transparent, and competency-driven assessments will enhance graduate preparedness, ensure alignment with NQF standards and support SDG 4's goal of quality education.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study provides empirical evidence supporting assessment policy improvements, promoting structured, competency-based assessments that enhance fairness, deepen learning and align with nursing education standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":"30 ","pages":"3061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengthening theoretical assessment design in nursing education: Advancing SDG 4.\",\"authors\":\"Gabieba Donough, Katlego Mthimunye, Felicity Daniels\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality theoretical assessments in nursing education are essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 (ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all). However, misalignment with National Qualification Framework (NQF) standards, an overreliance on recall-based questions and inadequate educator training undermine the fairness of assessments and students' ability to demonstrate clinical competence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study explores theoretical assessment design in nursing education, evaluating its alignment with NQF standards, competency-based assessments and Sustainable Development Goal 4.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Conducted at a South African nursing school offering undergraduate nursing programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multimethod approach integrated educator interviews, document reviews of moderation reports, a scoping review and a student survey to investigate assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While educators valued Bloom's Taxonomy, over-reliance on recall-based questions limited critical thinking, clinical decision-making and competency development. Misalignment with NQF standards caused inconsistencies in cognitive demand, while gaps in moderation processes impacted assessment validity and fairness. Educators faced challenges because of limited training and support, and students struggled with ambiguous and linguistically complex assessments that hindered their ability to demonstrate competency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strengthening assessment design, moderation and educator training is essential to improving competency-based assessment practices in nursing education. Policy reforms promoting fair, transparent, and competency-driven assessments will enhance graduate preparedness, ensure alignment with NQF standards and support SDG 4's goal of quality education.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study provides empirical evidence supporting assessment policy improvements, promoting structured, competency-based assessments that enhance fairness, deepen learning and align with nursing education standards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health SA Gesondheid\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"3061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health SA Gesondheid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.3061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理教育中的高质量理论评估对于实现可持续发展目标4(确保包容和公平的优质教育,促进全民终身学习机会)至关重要。然而,与国家资格框架(NQF)标准不一致,过度依赖基于回忆的问题和教育工作者培训不足破坏了评估的公平性和学生展示临床能力的能力。目的:探讨护理教育的理论评估设计,评估其与NQF标准、基于能力的评估和可持续发展目标4的一致性。环境:在南非一所提供本科护理课程的护理学校进行。方法:采用多方法方法,包括教育者访谈、适度报告的文献回顾、范围评估和学生调查来调查评估实践。结果:虽然教育工作者重视布鲁姆的分类法,但过度依赖基于回忆的问题限制了批判性思维、临床决策和能力发展。与NQF标准的不一致导致了认知需求的不一致,而调节过程的差距影响了评估的有效性和公平性。教育工作者面临着挑战,因为培训和支持有限,学生们在模棱两可和语言复杂的评估中挣扎,阻碍了他们展示能力的能力。结论:加强评估设计、调节和教育工作者培训是完善护理教育能力评估实践的关键。促进公平、透明和能力驱动的评估的政策改革将加强毕业生准备,确保与NQF标准保持一致,并支持可持续发展目标4的优质教育目标。贡献:本研究提供了经验证据,支持评估政策的改进,促进结构化的,基于能力的评估,以增强公平性,深化学习并与护理教育标准保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strengthening theoretical assessment design in nursing education: Advancing SDG 4.

Background: Quality theoretical assessments in nursing education are essential for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 (ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all). However, misalignment with National Qualification Framework (NQF) standards, an overreliance on recall-based questions and inadequate educator training undermine the fairness of assessments and students' ability to demonstrate clinical competence.

Aim: This study explores theoretical assessment design in nursing education, evaluating its alignment with NQF standards, competency-based assessments and Sustainable Development Goal 4.

Setting: Conducted at a South African nursing school offering undergraduate nursing programmes.

Methods: A multimethod approach integrated educator interviews, document reviews of moderation reports, a scoping review and a student survey to investigate assessment practices.

Results: While educators valued Bloom's Taxonomy, over-reliance on recall-based questions limited critical thinking, clinical decision-making and competency development. Misalignment with NQF standards caused inconsistencies in cognitive demand, while gaps in moderation processes impacted assessment validity and fairness. Educators faced challenges because of limited training and support, and students struggled with ambiguous and linguistically complex assessments that hindered their ability to demonstrate competency.

Conclusion: Strengthening assessment design, moderation and educator training is essential to improving competency-based assessment practices in nursing education. Policy reforms promoting fair, transparent, and competency-driven assessments will enhance graduate preparedness, ensure alignment with NQF standards and support SDG 4's goal of quality education.

Contribution: This study provides empirical evidence supporting assessment policy improvements, promoting structured, competency-based assessments that enhance fairness, deepen learning and align with nursing education standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信