低收入和中等收入国家计划生育服务有效覆盖方面的不公平现象:将住户和设施调查联系起来。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shenning Tian, Elizabeth A Hazel, Melinda Munos, Abdoulaye Maïga, Safia S Jiwani, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家计划生育服务有效覆盖方面的不公平现象:将住户和设施调查联系起来。","authors":"Shenning Tian, Elizabeth A Hazel, Melinda Munos, Abdoulaye Maïga, Safia S Jiwani, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite decades of family planning (FP) programme successes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), women still face an unmet need for contraceptives, as well as inequalities in coverage. Including elements of service readiness in FP intervention coverage measures will better inform population-level programme performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified five LMICs that had health facility and household surveys conducted <5 years apart within the past ten years: Bangladesh, Haiti, Malawi, Nepal, and Tanzania; only Nepal had time-trend data available. We developed quality readiness-adjusted FP coverage measures by linking health facility assessments (i.e. readiness) and household surveys (i.e. intervention coverage) according to ecological linking methods. We defined linking units by facility type, managing authority, and geographic location using women's reported source of contraceptives. We defined intervention coverage as the percentage of women aged 15-49 years who needed contraceptive services and were using a modern method, and calculated readiness-adjusted intervention coverage with the average FP readiness score in each linking unit. We used a coverage cascade model to understand gaps in health service readiness and access, and performed a health equity analysis for wealth, locality, and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large gaps in FP intervention coverage and readiness were present in all settings. Facility readiness scores ranged from 0.58 to 0.66, with gaps in coverage and readiness-adjusted coverage ranging from 49 percentage points (pp) in Bangladesh to 21 pp in Haiti. Urban, wealthier, and adolescent women had lower readiness-adjusted coverage because they also obtained their contraceptives outside of health facilities. Coverage cascades changed little for Nepal between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By calculating readiness-adjusted FP coverage using a cascade model in five geographically diverse countries, including time trends in one country, we found large gaps in intervention and readiness-adjusted coverage with related inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequities in effective coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: linking household and facility surveys.\",\"authors\":\"Shenning Tian, Elizabeth A Hazel, Melinda Munos, Abdoulaye Maïga, Safia S Jiwani, Emily B Wilson, Gouda Roland Mesmer Mady, Agbessi Amouzou\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite decades of family planning (FP) programme successes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), women still face an unmet need for contraceptives, as well as inequalities in coverage. Including elements of service readiness in FP intervention coverage measures will better inform population-level programme performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified five LMICs that had health facility and household surveys conducted <5 years apart within the past ten years: Bangladesh, Haiti, Malawi, Nepal, and Tanzania; only Nepal had time-trend data available. We developed quality readiness-adjusted FP coverage measures by linking health facility assessments (i.e. readiness) and household surveys (i.e. intervention coverage) according to ecological linking methods. We defined linking units by facility type, managing authority, and geographic location using women's reported source of contraceptives. We defined intervention coverage as the percentage of women aged 15-49 years who needed contraceptive services and were using a modern method, and calculated readiness-adjusted intervention coverage with the average FP readiness score in each linking unit. We used a coverage cascade model to understand gaps in health service readiness and access, and performed a health equity analysis for wealth, locality, and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large gaps in FP intervention coverage and readiness were present in all settings. Facility readiness scores ranged from 0.58 to 0.66, with gaps in coverage and readiness-adjusted coverage ranging from 49 percentage points (pp) in Bangladesh to 21 pp in Haiti. Urban, wealthier, and adolescent women had lower readiness-adjusted coverage because they also obtained their contraceptives outside of health facilities. Coverage cascades changed little for Nepal between 2015 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By calculating readiness-adjusted FP coverage using a cascade model in five geographically diverse countries, including time trends in one country, we found large gaps in intervention and readiness-adjusted coverage with related inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12427599/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04211\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管低收入和中等收入国家的计划生育(FP)规划取得了数十年的成功,但妇女对避孕药具的需求仍未得到满足,而且避孕药具的覆盖率也不平等。在计划生育干预措施覆盖措施中纳入服务准备的要素将更好地为人口一级的方案执行情况提供信息。方法:我们确定了五个进行了卫生设施和家庭调查的低收入国家。结果:计划生育干预的覆盖率和准备程度在所有环境中都存在很大差距。设施准备程度得分从0.58到0.66不等,覆盖率和准备程度调整后的覆盖率差距从孟加拉国的49个百分点到海地的21个百分点不等。城市、较富裕和青少年妇女的准备率调整覆盖率较低,因为她们也是在卫生机构之外获得避孕药具的。2015年至2021年期间,尼泊尔的覆盖范围变化不大。结论:通过使用级联模型计算五个地理上不同的国家的准备情况调整后的计划生育覆盖率,包括一个国家的时间趋势,我们发现干预和准备情况调整后的覆盖率存在很大差距,并存在相关的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inequities in effective coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: linking household and facility surveys.

Inequities in effective coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: linking household and facility surveys.

Inequities in effective coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: linking household and facility surveys.

Inequities in effective coverage of family planning services in low- and middle-income countries: linking household and facility surveys.

Background: Despite decades of family planning (FP) programme successes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), women still face an unmet need for contraceptives, as well as inequalities in coverage. Including elements of service readiness in FP intervention coverage measures will better inform population-level programme performance.

Methods: We identified five LMICs that had health facility and household surveys conducted <5 years apart within the past ten years: Bangladesh, Haiti, Malawi, Nepal, and Tanzania; only Nepal had time-trend data available. We developed quality readiness-adjusted FP coverage measures by linking health facility assessments (i.e. readiness) and household surveys (i.e. intervention coverage) according to ecological linking methods. We defined linking units by facility type, managing authority, and geographic location using women's reported source of contraceptives. We defined intervention coverage as the percentage of women aged 15-49 years who needed contraceptive services and were using a modern method, and calculated readiness-adjusted intervention coverage with the average FP readiness score in each linking unit. We used a coverage cascade model to understand gaps in health service readiness and access, and performed a health equity analysis for wealth, locality, and age.

Results: Large gaps in FP intervention coverage and readiness were present in all settings. Facility readiness scores ranged from 0.58 to 0.66, with gaps in coverage and readiness-adjusted coverage ranging from 49 percentage points (pp) in Bangladesh to 21 pp in Haiti. Urban, wealthier, and adolescent women had lower readiness-adjusted coverage because they also obtained their contraceptives outside of health facilities. Coverage cascades changed little for Nepal between 2015 and 2021.

Conclusions: By calculating readiness-adjusted FP coverage using a cascade model in five geographically diverse countries, including time trends in one country, we found large gaps in intervention and readiness-adjusted coverage with related inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信