Joshua Jeyandran, Cynthia J Roberts, Phillip T Yuhas
{"title":"坐姿和仰卧位的便携式a扫描超声生物计的内部和内部观察者的一致性以及与光学生物计的有效性。","authors":"Joshua Jeyandran, Cynthia J Roberts, Phillip T Yuhas","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S535433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purposes of this study were to test the validity of a portable ultrasound biometer (6000 Scanmate-A, DGH Technology) against an optical biometer and to establish its repeatability and reproducibility on patients in sitting and supine positions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Healthy adults (N = 51) were recruited prospectively. At two study visits, Observer 1 made five measurements of AL and ACD in the right eye using an optical biometer (IOLMaster, Zeiss). Then two sets of three measurements of AL and ACD were made using the Scanmate-A, one while participants were sitting and another while they were supine. Observer 2 made the same measurements at one visit on a subset of participants (n = 42). Averages of the measurements were prepared for analysis (significance threshold set to α = 0.01) according to Bland and Altman, repeated-measures analyses of variance, linear correlations, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL and ACD were significantly shorter when measured by the Scanmate-A (median [interquartile range] = 23.4 [22.5, 24.7] mm and mean ± standard deviation = 3.22 ± 0.45 mm, respectively) than when measured by IOLMaster (23.8 [23.1, 25.2] mm and 3.51 ± 0.33 mm, respectively). For both body positions, there were no differences in ACD and AL between visit 1 and visit 2. Correlations were strong between the visits, but the limits of agreement varied. Similarly, there were no significant differences between Observer 1 and Observer 2. Correlations and ICC were strong-to-moderate between the observers, and the limits of agreement varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with reports on other a-scan devices, the Scanmate-A measured shorter AL and shallower ACD than the IOLMaster. Although, mean or median AL and ACD did not differ across study visits, observers, and body positions, large limits of agreement on Bland-Altman analyses must be accounted for by users of the Scanmate-A.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"17 ","pages":"283-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and Inter-Observer Agreement of a Portable A-Scan Ultrasound Biometer in Sitting and Supine Positions and Validity Against an Optical Biometer.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Jeyandran, Cynthia J Roberts, Phillip T Yuhas\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTO.S535433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purposes of this study were to test the validity of a portable ultrasound biometer (6000 Scanmate-A, DGH Technology) against an optical biometer and to establish its repeatability and reproducibility on patients in sitting and supine positions.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Healthy adults (N = 51) were recruited prospectively. At two study visits, Observer 1 made five measurements of AL and ACD in the right eye using an optical biometer (IOLMaster, Zeiss). Then two sets of three measurements of AL and ACD were made using the Scanmate-A, one while participants were sitting and another while they were supine. Observer 2 made the same measurements at one visit on a subset of participants (n = 42). Averages of the measurements were prepared for analysis (significance threshold set to α = 0.01) according to Bland and Altman, repeated-measures analyses of variance, linear correlations, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL and ACD were significantly shorter when measured by the Scanmate-A (median [interquartile range] = 23.4 [22.5, 24.7] mm and mean ± standard deviation = 3.22 ± 0.45 mm, respectively) than when measured by IOLMaster (23.8 [23.1, 25.2] mm and 3.51 ± 0.33 mm, respectively). For both body positions, there were no differences in ACD and AL between visit 1 and visit 2. Correlations were strong between the visits, but the limits of agreement varied. Similarly, there were no significant differences between Observer 1 and Observer 2. Correlations and ICC were strong-to-moderate between the observers, and the limits of agreement varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent with reports on other a-scan devices, the Scanmate-A measured shorter AL and shallower ACD than the IOLMaster. Although, mean or median AL and ACD did not differ across study visits, observers, and body positions, large limits of agreement on Bland-Altman analyses must be accounted for by users of the Scanmate-A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"283-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S535433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S535433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intra- and Inter-Observer Agreement of a Portable A-Scan Ultrasound Biometer in Sitting and Supine Positions and Validity Against an Optical Biometer.
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to test the validity of a portable ultrasound biometer (6000 Scanmate-A, DGH Technology) against an optical biometer and to establish its repeatability and reproducibility on patients in sitting and supine positions.
Patients and methods: Healthy adults (N = 51) were recruited prospectively. At two study visits, Observer 1 made five measurements of AL and ACD in the right eye using an optical biometer (IOLMaster, Zeiss). Then two sets of three measurements of AL and ACD were made using the Scanmate-A, one while participants were sitting and another while they were supine. Observer 2 made the same measurements at one visit on a subset of participants (n = 42). Averages of the measurements were prepared for analysis (significance threshold set to α = 0.01) according to Bland and Altman, repeated-measures analyses of variance, linear correlations, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results: AL and ACD were significantly shorter when measured by the Scanmate-A (median [interquartile range] = 23.4 [22.5, 24.7] mm and mean ± standard deviation = 3.22 ± 0.45 mm, respectively) than when measured by IOLMaster (23.8 [23.1, 25.2] mm and 3.51 ± 0.33 mm, respectively). For both body positions, there were no differences in ACD and AL between visit 1 and visit 2. Correlations were strong between the visits, but the limits of agreement varied. Similarly, there were no significant differences between Observer 1 and Observer 2. Correlations and ICC were strong-to-moderate between the observers, and the limits of agreement varied.
Conclusion: Consistent with reports on other a-scan devices, the Scanmate-A measured shorter AL and shallower ACD than the IOLMaster. Although, mean or median AL and ACD did not differ across study visits, observers, and body positions, large limits of agreement on Bland-Altman analyses must be accounted for by users of the Scanmate-A.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.