功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术和球囊鼻窦成形术的趋势和并发症:TriNetX数据库分析。

IF 1.4 Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.222
Benjamin F Bitner, Sina J Torabi, Theodore V Nguyen, Jonathan C Pang, Edward C Kuan
{"title":"功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术和球囊鼻窦成形术的趋势和并发症:TriNetX数据库分析。","authors":"Benjamin F Bitner, Sina J Torabi, Theodore V Nguyen, Jonathan C Pang, Edward C Kuan","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) have undergone changes in utilization over time. This study investigates national trends in BSP and FESS and postoperative outcomes over the last decade as well as the impact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing either FESS or BSP from 1/1/2011 to 5/4/2024. Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnoses, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1738 patients underwent BSP and 90,311 underwent FESS. A greater proportion of FESS patients had diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.001), hypertension (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and chronic pulmonary disease, <i>p</i> = 0.001) compared to BSP whereas a similar proportion of patients for both cohorts had a history of ischemic heart disease (<i>p</i> = 0.73). Body mass index was higher for patients undergoing FESS (28.6 ± 6.5) compared to BSP (28.1 ± 6.578; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall postoperative complications were similar between BSP and FESS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.09) with similar rates of epistaxis (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.01-2.25). Overall revision rate was higher for FESS (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.21-0.57). Thirty-day readmission (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66) and Emergency Department visits (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92) were less common in patients who received BSP. Surgical volume consistently increased over time for both cohorts but at a more rapid pace for BSP (425.64%) compared to FESS (274.19%) and a dramatic decrease in volume by 44.85% and 22.28%, respectively, at the onset of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, BSP and FESS surgical volume have steadily increased over time with a drastic reduction following the COVID-19 pandemic. BSP and FESS carry different complication profiles emphasizing the importance of patient selection and preoperative counseling.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"11 3","pages":"368-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends and complications in functional endoscopic sinus surgery and balloon sinuplasty: A TriNetX database analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin F Bitner, Sina J Torabi, Theodore V Nguyen, Jonathan C Pang, Edward C Kuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wjo2.222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) have undergone changes in utilization over time. This study investigates national trends in BSP and FESS and postoperative outcomes over the last decade as well as the impact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing either FESS or BSP from 1/1/2011 to 5/4/2024. Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnoses, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1738 patients underwent BSP and 90,311 underwent FESS. A greater proportion of FESS patients had diabetes (<i>p</i> = 0.001), hypertension (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and chronic pulmonary disease, <i>p</i> = 0.001) compared to BSP whereas a similar proportion of patients for both cohorts had a history of ischemic heart disease (<i>p</i> = 0.73). Body mass index was higher for patients undergoing FESS (28.6 ± 6.5) compared to BSP (28.1 ± 6.578; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Overall postoperative complications were similar between BSP and FESS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.09) with similar rates of epistaxis (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.01-2.25). Overall revision rate was higher for FESS (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.21-0.57). Thirty-day readmission (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66) and Emergency Department visits (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92) were less common in patients who received BSP. Surgical volume consistently increased over time for both cohorts but at a more rapid pace for BSP (425.64%) compared to FESS (274.19%) and a dramatic decrease in volume by 44.85% and 22.28%, respectively, at the onset of COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, BSP and FESS surgical volume have steadily increased over time with a drastic reduction following the COVID-19 pandemic. BSP and FESS carry different complication profiles emphasizing the importance of patient selection and preoperative counseling.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 4.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"368-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418347/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:球囊鼻窦成形术(BSP)和功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)的应用随着时间的推移发生了变化。本研究调查了过去十年来BSP和FESS的全国趋势和术后结果,以及2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对这些趋势的影响。方法:查询TriNetX数据库2011年1月1日至2024年5月4日期间接受FESS或BSP治疗的患者。收集患者人口统计学、诊断和术后结果的数据。结果:BSP患者1738例,FESS患者90311例。与BSP相比,FESS患者有糖尿病(p = 0.001)和高血压(p = 0.001)的比例更高,而两个队列中有缺血性心脏病史的患者比例相似(p = 0.73)。FESS组体重指数(28.6±6.5)高于BSP组(28.1±6.578;p = 0.02)。BSP和FESS的总体术后并发症相似(优势比[OR] = 0.80, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.58-1.09),鼻出血(OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12)和脑脊液(CSF)泄漏(OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.01-2.25)发生率相似。FESS的总体修正率更高(OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.21-0.57)。30天再入院(OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66)和急诊就诊(OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92)在接受BSP的患者中较少见。随着时间的推移,两个队列的手术量持续增加,但BSP的手术量(425.64%)比FESS(274.19%)更快,在COVID-19发病时,手术量分别急剧下降44.85%和22.28%。结论:总体而言,BSP和FESS手术量随着时间的推移稳步增加,在COVID-19大流行后急剧减少。BSP和FESS具有不同的并发症概况,强调患者选择和术前咨询的重要性。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trends and complications in functional endoscopic sinus surgery and balloon sinuplasty: A TriNetX database analysis.

Trends and complications in functional endoscopic sinus surgery and balloon sinuplasty: A TriNetX database analysis.

Objectives: Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) have undergone changes in utilization over time. This study investigates national trends in BSP and FESS and postoperative outcomes over the last decade as well as the impact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on these trends.

Methods: The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing either FESS or BSP from 1/1/2011 to 5/4/2024. Data were collected on patient demographics, diagnoses, and postoperative outcomes.

Results: A total of 1738 patients underwent BSP and 90,311 underwent FESS. A greater proportion of FESS patients had diabetes (p = 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), and chronic pulmonary disease, p = 0.001) compared to BSP whereas a similar proportion of patients for both cohorts had a history of ischemic heart disease (p = 0.73). Body mass index was higher for patients undergoing FESS (28.6 ± 6.5) compared to BSP (28.1 ± 6.578; p = 0.02). Overall postoperative complications were similar between BSP and FESS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.09) with similar rates of epistaxis (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.53-1.12) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.01-2.25). Overall revision rate was higher for FESS (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.21-0.57). Thirty-day readmission (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66) and Emergency Department visits (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.28-0.92) were less common in patients who received BSP. Surgical volume consistently increased over time for both cohorts but at a more rapid pace for BSP (425.64%) compared to FESS (274.19%) and a dramatic decrease in volume by 44.85% and 22.28%, respectively, at the onset of COVID-19.

Conclusion: Overall, BSP and FESS surgical volume have steadily increased over time with a drastic reduction following the COVID-19 pandemic. BSP and FESS carry different complication profiles emphasizing the importance of patient selection and preoperative counseling.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信