评价用于英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗定量的即时护理仪器。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mark Ainsworth, Torben Knudsen, Karina Vogn Koch, Mads Nybo, Morten Beck Trelle
{"title":"评价用于英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗定量的即时护理仪器。","authors":"Mark Ainsworth, Torben Knudsen, Karina Vogn Koch, Mads Nybo, Morten Beck Trelle","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2559355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment with infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) are used in a range of inflammatory diseases. Measurement of drug levels is warranted, but can be challenged by turn-around-times at the laboratories. Consequently, point-of-care testing (POCT) technology is becoming increasingly relevant. We evaluated the precision and comparability of results obtained with ProciseDx (Biosynex) when used in outpatient gastroenterology clinics monitoring IFX and ADL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective multi-center study, capillary and venous blood samples were collected by trained nurses from patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy with either IFX or ADL. Fourteen different nurses performed blood sampling and IFX measurements using ProciseDx on 64 patients, while 11 different nurses performed ADL measurements on 48 patients. Venous samples were sent to the laboratory for routine testing using Promonitor ELISA kit on a Triturus (Grifols).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all patients and all sites, a variation of 18.9% and 11.4% was observed for IFX and ADL measurements, respectively. Peak variance was in the 5-10 mg/L IFX concentration range, while peak variance for ADL measurements was above 12 mg/L. Compared to the routine ELISA, the <i>r</i>-value was 0.82 for IFX with a mean total deviation of 2.10 mg/L (27.1%). For ADL, the <i>r</i>-value was 0.91 with a mean total deviation of 2.93 mg/L (39.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We find the efficacy and accuracy of the ProciseDx acceptable, but when performed by non-laboratory personnel, the differences to routine measurements are considerable and could have a clinical impact. Clinical implementation would at least require reevaluation of the therapeutic intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of point-of-care instrument for quantification of infliximab and adalimumab.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Ainsworth, Torben Knudsen, Karina Vogn Koch, Mads Nybo, Morten Beck Trelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2559355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment with infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) are used in a range of inflammatory diseases. Measurement of drug levels is warranted, but can be challenged by turn-around-times at the laboratories. Consequently, point-of-care testing (POCT) technology is becoming increasingly relevant. We evaluated the precision and comparability of results obtained with ProciseDx (Biosynex) when used in outpatient gastroenterology clinics monitoring IFX and ADL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective multi-center study, capillary and venous blood samples were collected by trained nurses from patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy with either IFX or ADL. Fourteen different nurses performed blood sampling and IFX measurements using ProciseDx on 64 patients, while 11 different nurses performed ADL measurements on 48 patients. Venous samples were sent to the laboratory for routine testing using Promonitor ELISA kit on a Triturus (Grifols).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all patients and all sites, a variation of 18.9% and 11.4% was observed for IFX and ADL measurements, respectively. Peak variance was in the 5-10 mg/L IFX concentration range, while peak variance for ADL measurements was above 12 mg/L. Compared to the routine ELISA, the <i>r</i>-value was 0.82 for IFX with a mean total deviation of 2.10 mg/L (27.1%). For ADL, the <i>r</i>-value was 0.91 with a mean total deviation of 2.93 mg/L (39.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We find the efficacy and accuracy of the ProciseDx acceptable, but when performed by non-laboratory personnel, the differences to routine measurements are considerable and could have a clinical impact. Clinical implementation would at least require reevaluation of the therapeutic intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2559355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2559355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADL)治疗用于一系列炎症性疾病。药物水平的测量是必要的,但可能受到实验室周转时间的挑战。因此,护理点测试(POCT)技术正变得越来越重要。我们评估了ProciseDx (Biosynex)在门诊胃肠病学诊所监测IFX和ADL时获得的结果的准确性和可比性。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性多中心研究中,由训练有素的护士采集炎症性肠病患者的毛细血管和静脉血样本,这些患者接受IFX或ADL维持治疗。14名护士使用ProciseDx对64名患者进行了血液采样和IFX测量,11名护士对48名患者进行了ADL测量。静脉标本送实验室常规检测,采用Promonitor酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA kit)。结果:在所有患者和所有部位,IFX和ADL测量值的差异分别为18.9%和11.4%。变异峰在IFX浓度5 ~ 10 mg/L范围内,而ADL的变异峰在12 mg/L以上。与常规ELISA相比,IFX的r值为0.82,平均总偏差为2.10 mg/L(27.1%)。ADL的r值为0.91,平均总偏差为2.93 mg/L(39.7%)。结论:我们发现ProciseDx的有效性和准确性是可以接受的,但当由非实验室人员执行时,与常规测量的差异是相当大的,可能会产生临床影响。临床应用至少需要重新评估治疗间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of point-of-care instrument for quantification of infliximab and adalimumab.

Introduction: Treatment with infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADL) are used in a range of inflammatory diseases. Measurement of drug levels is warranted, but can be challenged by turn-around-times at the laboratories. Consequently, point-of-care testing (POCT) technology is becoming increasingly relevant. We evaluated the precision and comparability of results obtained with ProciseDx (Biosynex) when used in outpatient gastroenterology clinics monitoring IFX and ADL.

Materials and methods: In this prospective multi-center study, capillary and venous blood samples were collected by trained nurses from patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy with either IFX or ADL. Fourteen different nurses performed blood sampling and IFX measurements using ProciseDx on 64 patients, while 11 different nurses performed ADL measurements on 48 patients. Venous samples were sent to the laboratory for routine testing using Promonitor ELISA kit on a Triturus (Grifols).

Results: Across all patients and all sites, a variation of 18.9% and 11.4% was observed for IFX and ADL measurements, respectively. Peak variance was in the 5-10 mg/L IFX concentration range, while peak variance for ADL measurements was above 12 mg/L. Compared to the routine ELISA, the r-value was 0.82 for IFX with a mean total deviation of 2.10 mg/L (27.1%). For ADL, the r-value was 0.91 with a mean total deviation of 2.93 mg/L (39.7%).

Conclusion: We find the efficacy and accuracy of the ProciseDx acceptable, but when performed by non-laboratory personnel, the differences to routine measurements are considerable and could have a clinical impact. Clinical implementation would at least require reevaluation of the therapeutic intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信