葡萄糖的解释意义和作用:用文本描述增强1型糖尿病的决策。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420188251362089
Rujiravee Kongdee, Bijan Parsia, Hood Thabit, Simon Harper
{"title":"葡萄糖的解释意义和作用:用文本描述增强1型糖尿病的决策。","authors":"Rujiravee Kongdee, Bijan Parsia, Hood Thabit, Simon Harper","doi":"10.1177/20420188251362089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Findings from our previous study indicate that people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) unknowingly misinterpret data displayed on glucose monitoring systems and make inaccurate treatment decisions, which increases the risk of hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness of incorporating textual descriptions in glucose monitoring systems compared to existing systems. The main goal is to minimise the effort required in glucose data interpretation, facilitating better self-management and ultimately improving haemoglobin A1C levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm and mixed-methods evaluation was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to the control arm (existing systems) or the experimental arm (newly developed systems incorporating textual descriptions). In the first part, a task-based usability assessment was conducted to compare performance between the two arms. The second part evaluated participant preferences, agreement with textual descriptions and perceptions of the new systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 participants were recruited. The experimental arm achieved an 85.15% total correctness score, compared to 74.38% in the control arm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The experimental arm particularly outperformed the control arm in the ambiguous tasks, such as compression low. However, despite a higher performance and greater agreement with the textual descriptions, the experimental group exhibited a less favourable perception compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating textual description into glucose monitoring systems enhances treatment decision-making for people with T1DM. It suggests that we are on the right path to helping them better understand their glucose data and assist their self-management. Extensive research is required to focus more on the patient-centred approach in information presentation and prioritise it in parallel with other advancements in glucose monitoring technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22998,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420188251362089"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.\",\"authors\":\"Rujiravee Kongdee, Bijan Parsia, Hood Thabit, Simon Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420188251362089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Findings from our previous study indicate that people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) unknowingly misinterpret data displayed on glucose monitoring systems and make inaccurate treatment decisions, which increases the risk of hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess the effectiveness of incorporating textual descriptions in glucose monitoring systems compared to existing systems. The main goal is to minimise the effort required in glucose data interpretation, facilitating better self-management and ultimately improving haemoglobin A1C levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm and mixed-methods evaluation was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to the control arm (existing systems) or the experimental arm (newly developed systems incorporating textual descriptions). In the first part, a task-based usability assessment was conducted to compare performance between the two arms. The second part evaluated participant preferences, agreement with textual descriptions and perceptions of the new systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 participants were recruited. The experimental arm achieved an 85.15% total correctness score, compared to 74.38% in the control arm (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The experimental arm particularly outperformed the control arm in the ambiguous tasks, such as compression low. However, despite a higher performance and greater agreement with the textual descriptions, the experimental group exhibited a less favourable perception compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating textual description into glucose monitoring systems enhances treatment decision-making for people with T1DM. It suggests that we are on the right path to helping them better understand their glucose data and assist their self-management. Extensive research is required to focus more on the patient-centred approach in information presentation and prioritise it in parallel with other advancements in glucose monitoring technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"20420188251362089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12420987/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188251362089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188251362089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们之前的研究结果表明,1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者在不知情的情况下误解了血糖监测系统显示的数据,做出了不准确的治疗决定,这增加了住院的风险。目的:本研究旨在评估与现有系统相比,将文本描述纳入血糖监测系统的有效性。主要目标是尽量减少葡萄糖数据解释所需的工作量,促进更好的自我管理,并最终提高血红蛋白A1C水平。方法:采用双臂和混合方法进行评价。参与者被随机分配到对照组(现有系统)或实验组(新开发的包含文本描述的系统)。在第一部分中,进行了基于任务的可用性评估,以比较两个手臂之间的性能。第二部分评估参与者的偏好,对文本描述的同意和对新系统的看法。结果:共招募了86名参与者。实验组的总准确率为85.15%,而对照组为74.38% (p)。结论:将文本描述纳入血糖监测系统可以提高T1DM患者的治疗决策。这表明我们正走在正确的道路上,帮助他们更好地了解他们的血糖数据,帮助他们自我管理。需要进行广泛的研究,更多地关注以患者为中心的信息呈现方法,并将其与血糖监测技术的其他进展并行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.

Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.

Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.

Glucose interpretation meaning and action: enhancing type 1 diabetes decision-making with textual descriptions.

Background: Findings from our previous study indicate that people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) unknowingly misinterpret data displayed on glucose monitoring systems and make inaccurate treatment decisions, which increases the risk of hospitalisation.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of incorporating textual descriptions in glucose monitoring systems compared to existing systems. The main goal is to minimise the effort required in glucose data interpretation, facilitating better self-management and ultimately improving haemoglobin A1C levels.

Methods: A two-arm and mixed-methods evaluation was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated to the control arm (existing systems) or the experimental arm (newly developed systems incorporating textual descriptions). In the first part, a task-based usability assessment was conducted to compare performance between the two arms. The second part evaluated participant preferences, agreement with textual descriptions and perceptions of the new systems.

Results: A total of 86 participants were recruited. The experimental arm achieved an 85.15% total correctness score, compared to 74.38% in the control arm (p < 0.001). The experimental arm particularly outperformed the control arm in the ambiguous tasks, such as compression low. However, despite a higher performance and greater agreement with the textual descriptions, the experimental group exhibited a less favourable perception compared to the control group.

Conclusion: Incorporating textual description into glucose monitoring systems enhances treatment decision-making for people with T1DM. It suggests that we are on the right path to helping them better understand their glucose data and assist their self-management. Extensive research is required to focus more on the patient-centred approach in information presentation and prioritise it in parallel with other advancements in glucose monitoring technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of endocrinology and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信