髋部骨折患者囊周神经群阻滞不同局麻量。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.6038
Yusuf Özgüner, Savaş Altinsoy, Gökçen Kültüroğlu, Sevda Gökçe Gürpinar, Derya Özkan, Jülide Ergil, Erbil Aydin
{"title":"髋部骨折患者囊周神经群阻滞不同局麻量。","authors":"Yusuf Özgüner, Savaş Altinsoy, Gökçen Kültüroğlu, Sevda Gökçe Gürpinar, Derya Özkan, Jülide Ergil, Erbil Aydin","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.6038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"55 4","pages":"860-867"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Özgüner, Savaş Altinsoy, Gökçen Kültüroğlu, Sevda Gökçe Gürpinar, Derya Özkan, Jülide Ergil, Erbil Aydin\",\"doi\":\"10.55730/1300-0144.6038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"860-867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:囊周神经阻滞是治疗髋部骨折患者疼痛的有效方法。在我们的研究中,我们比较了三种不同的局部麻醉量的彭阻滞患者接受髋部骨折手术。材料与方法:采用脊柱麻醉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的患者60例,根据局麻量分为3组:1组(20 mL)、2组(30 mL)、3组(40 mL)。术后开始患者自控镇痛。监测术后曲马多用量、休息和运动疼痛评分以及运动阻滞持续时间。结果:组2(118±35.48 mg)和组3(115±42.98 mg)较组1(151±31.43 mg)减少曲马多摄入量(p < 0.05)。组3(161±18.6 min)的运动阻滞持续时间(达到Bromage评分0的时间)较组1(132.25±13.71 min)和组2(143.5±19.54 min)明显延长(p < 0.05)。结论:我们发现30 mL和40 mL体积的PENG块比20 mL体积的曲马多消耗更低。我们认为30ml的体积是三种体积中最合适的选择,因为它与40ml的体积具有相似的镇痛效果,但造成的运动阻滞较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

Background/aim: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored.

Results: We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical  details of a given medical  subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信