塑料制造完美:一个协作的,具有成本效益的多层次尸体学习方法。

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-09-10 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081
Kerilyn Godbe, Cole Bird, Dylan Vance, Niaman Nazir, Lyndsey Kilgore, German Berbel, David Megee, Ravi Garg, James Butterworth, Rebecca Farmer
{"title":"塑料制造完美:一个协作的,具有成本效益的多层次尸体学习方法。","authors":"Kerilyn Godbe, Cole Bird, Dylan Vance, Niaman Nazir, Lyndsey Kilgore, German Berbel, David Megee, Ravi Garg, James Butterworth, Rebecca Farmer","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students are losing hands-on experience during surgical clerkships, and residents and faculty are expected to teach them with minimal educational training. A multilevel cadaveric curriculum (MCC) was implemented to improve surgical education for all groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the MCC, a senior resident verbally guided 2 medical students through a procedure on a cadaver, whereas a junior resident performed the procedure on the contralateral side under faculty guidance. Educational benefits were assessed via pre- and postsurveys, with costs shared between surgical departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six MCC laboratory sessions were performed from 2023 to 2024, with a survey response rate of 89.6% (173 of 193). The laboratory sessions increased medical students' confidence in identifying procedural anatomy (3.9 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), using surgical instruments (4.3 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and assisting in the operating room (4.8 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Both junior and senior residents, respectively, noted increased confidence in marking incisions (3.1 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.9 versus 6.2, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), identifying neurovascular structures (2.7 versus 5.1, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.6 versus 6.0, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), completing procedures (2.0 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.0 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and teaching medical students (2.1 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 3.8 versus 5.5, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Faculty reported an increase in overall confidence in teaching ability (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.006) and providing feedback (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This laboratory was a beneficial educational experience for medical students, residents, and faculty, with improved cadaveric access achieved through cost sharing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 9","pages":"e7081"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Kerilyn Godbe, Cole Bird, Dylan Vance, Niaman Nazir, Lyndsey Kilgore, German Berbel, David Megee, Ravi Garg, James Butterworth, Rebecca Farmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students are losing hands-on experience during surgical clerkships, and residents and faculty are expected to teach them with minimal educational training. A multilevel cadaveric curriculum (MCC) was implemented to improve surgical education for all groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the MCC, a senior resident verbally guided 2 medical students through a procedure on a cadaver, whereas a junior resident performed the procedure on the contralateral side under faculty guidance. Educational benefits were assessed via pre- and postsurveys, with costs shared between surgical departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six MCC laboratory sessions were performed from 2023 to 2024, with a survey response rate of 89.6% (173 of 193). The laboratory sessions increased medical students' confidence in identifying procedural anatomy (3.9 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), using surgical instruments (4.3 versus 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and assisting in the operating room (4.8 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Both junior and senior residents, respectively, noted increased confidence in marking incisions (3.1 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.9 versus 6.2, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), identifying neurovascular structures (2.7 versus 5.1, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.6 versus 6.0, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), completing procedures (2.0 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 4.0 versus 5.6, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and teaching medical students (2.1 versus 4.3, <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 3.8 versus 5.5, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Faculty reported an increase in overall confidence in teaching ability (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.006) and providing feedback (6.2 versus 6.5, <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This laboratory was a beneficial educational experience for medical students, residents, and faculty, with improved cadaveric access achieved through cost sharing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"e7081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422776/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医科学生在外科实习期间失去了实践经验,住院医生和教师期望以最少的教育培训来教授他们。实施多层次尸体学课程(MCC),提高各群体的外科教育水平。方法:在MCC中,一名高级住院医师口头指导2名医学生在尸体上进行手术,而一名初级住院医师在教师指导下在对侧进行手术。通过前后调查评估教育效益,费用由外科部门分摊。结果:从2023年到2024年共进行了6次MCC实验室检查,调查回复率为89.6%(193例中有173例)。实验课程提高了医学生在识别程序解剖(3.9比5.3,P < 0.0001)、使用手术器械(4.3比5.3,P < 0.0001)和协助手术室(4.8比5.6,P < 0.0001)方面的信心。在标记切口(3.1比5.6,P < 0.0001; 4.9比6.2,P < 0.0001)、识别神经血管结构(2.7比5.1,P < 0.0001; 4.6比6.0,P < 0.0001)、完成手术(2.0比4.3,P < 0.0001; 4.0比5.6,P < 0.0001)和教授医学生(2.1比4.3,P < 0.0001; 3.8比5.5,P < 0.0001)方面,初级和高级住院医师的信心都有所增加。教师报告说,他们对教学能力(6.2对6.5,P = 0.006)和提供反馈(6.2对6.5,P = 0.032)的总体信心有所提高。结论:该实验室对医学生、住院医师和教师来说是一个有益的教育经验,通过费用分担,改善了尸体的获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.

Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.

Plastics Makes Perfect: A Collaborative, Cost-effective Approach to Multilevel Cadaveric Learning.

Background: Medical students are losing hands-on experience during surgical clerkships, and residents and faculty are expected to teach them with minimal educational training. A multilevel cadaveric curriculum (MCC) was implemented to improve surgical education for all groups.

Methods: In the MCC, a senior resident verbally guided 2 medical students through a procedure on a cadaver, whereas a junior resident performed the procedure on the contralateral side under faculty guidance. Educational benefits were assessed via pre- and postsurveys, with costs shared between surgical departments.

Results: Six MCC laboratory sessions were performed from 2023 to 2024, with a survey response rate of 89.6% (173 of 193). The laboratory sessions increased medical students' confidence in identifying procedural anatomy (3.9 versus 5.3, P < 0.0001), using surgical instruments (4.3 versus 5.3, P < 0.0001), and assisting in the operating room (4.8 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001). Both junior and senior residents, respectively, noted increased confidence in marking incisions (3.1 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001; 4.9 versus 6.2, P < 0.0001), identifying neurovascular structures (2.7 versus 5.1, P < 0.0001; 4.6 versus 6.0, P < 0.0001), completing procedures (2.0 versus 4.3, P < 0.0001; 4.0 versus 5.6, P < 0.0001), and teaching medical students (2.1 versus 4.3, P < 0.0001; 3.8 versus 5.5, P < 0.0001). Faculty reported an increase in overall confidence in teaching ability (6.2 versus 6.5, P = 0.006) and providing feedback (6.2 versus 6.5, P = 0.032).

Conclusions: This laboratory was a beneficial educational experience for medical students, residents, and faculty, with improved cadaveric access achieved through cost sharing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信