{"title":"女性外科医生在骨科手术中的挑战——综述。","authors":"Yasmen Alrumaidhi, Norah Alenizi, Nawar Almulla, Zainab Almousa, Danah Alenezi, Ali Lari","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S524482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of female doctors graduating from medical schools worldwide is increasing; however, orthopedic surgery remains one of the least gender-diverse surgical fields.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the literature on the challenges faced by female orthopedic surgeons, categorize them into key domains, and identify essential gaps to guide future research and institutional reform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review study design was employed, utilizing the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 2000 and 2024. Papers that addressed challenges faced by female orthopedic residents and surgeons were included; of the studies screened, 92 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Challenges were discussed in three main domains: female representation, the health and occupational risks, and the emotional environment. Approximately 23 challenges were identified. While the increase in female representation in orthopedic surgery more than doubled between 2000 and 2020, gender disparity persists. Musculoskeletal injuries were identified as the most common occupational health concern. Microaggressions were described in several forms: verbal comments, assumptions about skills, traditional role stereotypes, sexist language, and exclusion from informal networks.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study's limitations include unexplored multiple challenges due to the limited availability of data, such as unequal pay, patient preferences, and military orthopedic care. Most of the included studies were cross-sectional surveys, which limits generalizability and causal inference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the persistent gender-related challenges in the field of orthopedic surgery. Initiatives for mentorship and representation are in place and appear promising. Nonetheless, challenges related to occupational safety, well-being support, and leadership roles remain inadequately addressed. Future efforts must prioritize mentorship, ergonomic equipment design, strategies to address microaggressions, and institutional commitment to support female orthopedic surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"451-464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges for the Female Surgeon in Orthopedic Surgery - A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yasmen Alrumaidhi, Norah Alenizi, Nawar Almulla, Zainab Almousa, Danah Alenezi, Ali Lari\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ORR.S524482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of female doctors graduating from medical schools worldwide is increasing; however, orthopedic surgery remains one of the least gender-diverse surgical fields.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to map the literature on the challenges faced by female orthopedic surgeons, categorize them into key domains, and identify essential gaps to guide future research and institutional reform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review study design was employed, utilizing the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 2000 and 2024. Papers that addressed challenges faced by female orthopedic residents and surgeons were included; of the studies screened, 92 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Challenges were discussed in three main domains: female representation, the health and occupational risks, and the emotional environment. Approximately 23 challenges were identified. While the increase in female representation in orthopedic surgery more than doubled between 2000 and 2020, gender disparity persists. Musculoskeletal injuries were identified as the most common occupational health concern. Microaggressions were described in several forms: verbal comments, assumptions about skills, traditional role stereotypes, sexist language, and exclusion from informal networks.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study's limitations include unexplored multiple challenges due to the limited availability of data, such as unequal pay, patient preferences, and military orthopedic care. Most of the included studies were cross-sectional surveys, which limits generalizability and causal inference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review highlights the persistent gender-related challenges in the field of orthopedic surgery. Initiatives for mentorship and representation are in place and appear promising. Nonetheless, challenges related to occupational safety, well-being support, and leadership roles remain inadequately addressed. Future efforts must prioritize mentorship, ergonomic equipment design, strategies to address microaggressions, and institutional commitment to support female orthopedic surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"451-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422126/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S524482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S524482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:世界范围内从医学院毕业的女医生人数正在增加;然而,整形外科仍然是性别差异最小的外科领域之一。目的:本综述旨在对女性骨科医生面临的挑战进行文献梳理,将其分类到关键领域,并找出关键差距,以指导未来的研究和机构改革。方法:采用Arksey和O'Malley框架,采用范围回顾研究设计。PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science检索了2000年1月至2024年1月间发表的文章。涉及女性骨科住院医师和外科医生面临的挑战的论文被纳入;在筛选的研究中,有92项符合纳入标准。结果:在三个主要领域讨论了挑战:女性代表性、健康和职业风险以及情感环境。确定了大约23项挑战。虽然从2000年到2020年,整形外科的女性人数增加了一倍多,但性别差距仍然存在。肌肉骨骼损伤被确定为最常见的职业健康问题。微侵犯被描述为几种形式:口头评论、对技能的假设、传统角色刻板印象、性别歧视语言和被排除在非正式网络之外。局限性:该研究的局限性包括由于数据可用性有限而未探索的多重挑战,例如薪酬不平等,患者偏好和军事骨科护理。大多数纳入的研究是横断面调查,这限制了概括性和因果推理。结论:本综述强调了骨科手术领域持续存在的与性别相关的挑战。指导和代表的倡议已经到位,看起来很有希望。尽管如此,与职业安全、福利支持和领导角色相关的挑战仍然没有得到充分解决。未来的努力必须优先考虑指导、符合人体工程学的设备设计、解决微侵犯的策略以及支持女性骨科医生的机构承诺。
Challenges for the Female Surgeon in Orthopedic Surgery - A Scoping Review.
Background: The number of female doctors graduating from medical schools worldwide is increasing; however, orthopedic surgery remains one of the least gender-diverse surgical fields.
Objective: This scoping review aims to map the literature on the challenges faced by female orthopedic surgeons, categorize them into key domains, and identify essential gaps to guide future research and institutional reform.
Methods: A scoping review study design was employed, utilizing the Arksey and O'Malley framework. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 2000 and 2024. Papers that addressed challenges faced by female orthopedic residents and surgeons were included; of the studies screened, 92 met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Challenges were discussed in three main domains: female representation, the health and occupational risks, and the emotional environment. Approximately 23 challenges were identified. While the increase in female representation in orthopedic surgery more than doubled between 2000 and 2020, gender disparity persists. Musculoskeletal injuries were identified as the most common occupational health concern. Microaggressions were described in several forms: verbal comments, assumptions about skills, traditional role stereotypes, sexist language, and exclusion from informal networks.
Limitations: The study's limitations include unexplored multiple challenges due to the limited availability of data, such as unequal pay, patient preferences, and military orthopedic care. Most of the included studies were cross-sectional surveys, which limits generalizability and causal inference.
Conclusion: This review highlights the persistent gender-related challenges in the field of orthopedic surgery. Initiatives for mentorship and representation are in place and appear promising. Nonetheless, challenges related to occupational safety, well-being support, and leadership roles remain inadequately addressed. Future efforts must prioritize mentorship, ergonomic equipment design, strategies to address microaggressions, and institutional commitment to support female orthopedic surgeons.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.