神经内科教师对赞赏策略的看法。

IF 3.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200523
Sara W Hyman, Daniel N de Souza, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Laurence R Gore, Jennifer Bickel, Neil A Busis
{"title":"神经内科教师对赞赏策略的看法。","authors":"Sara W Hyman, Daniel N de Souza, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Laurence R Gore, Jennifer Bickel, Neil A Busis","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Burnout is a pervasive occupational hazard for neurologists-undermining their well-being, jeopardizing patient safety and satisfaction, limiting access to care, and inflating health care costs. Well-designed appreciation and recognition practices may help mitigate some of its key drivers. This pilot study evaluates faculty perspectives on appreciation strategies in an academic neurology department. We used the Moffitt Provider Appreciation Assessment (MPAA), which assesses the types of appreciation methods respondents value, regardless of whether those practices are currently implemented in their workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among full-time clinical faculty in the Department of Neurology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. The survey included demographics, the MPAA, the single-item Mini-Z burnout inventory to assess self-reported burnout levels, and an intent-to-leave question. MPAA responses were analyzed for frequencies, and the association between burnout and intent to leave was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 202 faculty members, 77 (38%) participated. The most highly valued appreciation practices were inclusion in decision making (77%), efforts to reduce daily frustrations (75%), and positive feedback from patients and families (71%). Gifts, team celebrations with food, and public affirmations were among the least valued practices. Burnout symptoms were reported by 45% of respondents, and 30% indicated an intent to leave within 2 years. Higher burnout levels were associated with increased intent to leave (<i>p</i> < 0.00001). Because the scores for self-reported burnout and intent to leave reflect current work conditions while MPAA scores capture enduring personal values, MPAA rankings cannot be compared directly with burnout or turnover metrics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Neurology clinical faculty prioritized appreciation methods that directly address clinical work, underscoring the value of implementing tailored recognition practices that may reduce burnout. The methodology used in this pilot study can be adapted for broader application in other settings. After identifying faculty preferences, health care organizations can implement meaningful, transparent, and inclusive appreciation strategies that have the potential to strengthen physician relationships, promote well-being, and support a sustainable workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"15 5","pages":"e200523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faculty Perspectives on Appreciation Strategies in a Neurology Department.\",\"authors\":\"Sara W Hyman, Daniel N de Souza, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Laurence R Gore, Jennifer Bickel, Neil A Busis\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Burnout is a pervasive occupational hazard for neurologists-undermining their well-being, jeopardizing patient safety and satisfaction, limiting access to care, and inflating health care costs. Well-designed appreciation and recognition practices may help mitigate some of its key drivers. This pilot study evaluates faculty perspectives on appreciation strategies in an academic neurology department. We used the Moffitt Provider Appreciation Assessment (MPAA), which assesses the types of appreciation methods respondents value, regardless of whether those practices are currently implemented in their workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among full-time clinical faculty in the Department of Neurology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. The survey included demographics, the MPAA, the single-item Mini-Z burnout inventory to assess self-reported burnout levels, and an intent-to-leave question. MPAA responses were analyzed for frequencies, and the association between burnout and intent to leave was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 202 faculty members, 77 (38%) participated. The most highly valued appreciation practices were inclusion in decision making (77%), efforts to reduce daily frustrations (75%), and positive feedback from patients and families (71%). Gifts, team celebrations with food, and public affirmations were among the least valued practices. Burnout symptoms were reported by 45% of respondents, and 30% indicated an intent to leave within 2 years. Higher burnout levels were associated with increased intent to leave (<i>p</i> < 0.00001). Because the scores for self-reported burnout and intent to leave reflect current work conditions while MPAA scores capture enduring personal values, MPAA rankings cannot be compared directly with burnout or turnover metrics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Neurology clinical faculty prioritized appreciation methods that directly address clinical work, underscoring the value of implementing tailored recognition practices that may reduce burnout. The methodology used in this pilot study can be adapted for broader application in other settings. After identifying faculty preferences, health care organizations can implement meaningful, transparent, and inclusive appreciation strategies that have the potential to strengthen physician relationships, promote well-being, and support a sustainable workforce.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"e200523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:职业倦怠是神经科医生普遍存在的职业危害——损害他们的健康,危及患者的安全和满意度,限制获得护理的机会,并增加医疗费用。精心设计的欣赏和认可实践可能有助于减轻其一些关键驱动因素。本初步研究评估了学术神经内科教师对欣赏策略的看法。我们使用了Moffitt供应商赞赏评估(MPAA),它评估了受访者所重视的赞赏方法的类型,而不管这些做法目前是否在他们的工作场所实施。方法:对纽约大学格罗斯曼医学院神经内科专职临床教师进行横断面调查。该调查包括人口统计数据、美国电影协会(MPAA)、用于评估自我倦怠水平的Mini-Z倦怠单项目清单,以及一个离职意向问题。分析了MPAA回应的频率,并检查了倦怠与离职意图之间的关系。结果:202名教师中,77人(38%)参加了培训。最有价值的赞赏做法是参与决策(77%),努力减少日常挫折(75%),以及患者和家属的积极反馈(71%)。赠送礼物、用食物庆祝团队以及公开表扬都是最不受重视的做法。45%的受访者报告了倦怠症状,30%的受访者表示有意在两年内离职。较高的倦怠水平与离职意图增加相关(p < 0.00001)。因为自我报告的倦怠和离职意向的分数反映了当前的工作状况,而MPAA的分数反映了持久的个人价值观,所以MPAA的排名不能直接与倦怠或离职指标进行比较。讨论:神经病学临床教师优先考虑直接针对临床工作的赞赏方法,强调实施量身定制的认可实践的价值,这可能会减少倦怠。这项试点研究中使用的方法可以在其他情况下更广泛地应用。在确定了教师的偏好之后,医疗机构可以实施有意义、透明和包容的赞赏策略,这些策略有可能加强医生关系,促进健康,并支持可持续的劳动力队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faculty Perspectives on Appreciation Strategies in a Neurology Department.

Background and objectives: Burnout is a pervasive occupational hazard for neurologists-undermining their well-being, jeopardizing patient safety and satisfaction, limiting access to care, and inflating health care costs. Well-designed appreciation and recognition practices may help mitigate some of its key drivers. This pilot study evaluates faculty perspectives on appreciation strategies in an academic neurology department. We used the Moffitt Provider Appreciation Assessment (MPAA), which assesses the types of appreciation methods respondents value, regardless of whether those practices are currently implemented in their workplace.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among full-time clinical faculty in the Department of Neurology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. The survey included demographics, the MPAA, the single-item Mini-Z burnout inventory to assess self-reported burnout levels, and an intent-to-leave question. MPAA responses were analyzed for frequencies, and the association between burnout and intent to leave was examined.

Results: Of the 202 faculty members, 77 (38%) participated. The most highly valued appreciation practices were inclusion in decision making (77%), efforts to reduce daily frustrations (75%), and positive feedback from patients and families (71%). Gifts, team celebrations with food, and public affirmations were among the least valued practices. Burnout symptoms were reported by 45% of respondents, and 30% indicated an intent to leave within 2 years. Higher burnout levels were associated with increased intent to leave (p < 0.00001). Because the scores for self-reported burnout and intent to leave reflect current work conditions while MPAA scores capture enduring personal values, MPAA rankings cannot be compared directly with burnout or turnover metrics.

Discussion: Neurology clinical faculty prioritized appreciation methods that directly address clinical work, underscoring the value of implementing tailored recognition practices that may reduce burnout. The methodology used in this pilot study can be adapted for broader application in other settings. After identifying faculty preferences, health care organizations can implement meaningful, transparent, and inclusive appreciation strategies that have the potential to strengthen physician relationships, promote well-being, and support a sustainable workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信