筛查接受心血管评估的患者视网膜缺血性血管周围病变(RIPLs):一项横断面研究。

IF 5.7 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Victor Bellanda, Adrienne Delaney, Matthew J Schulgit, Gabriel Castilho S Barbosa, Andrea Arline, Yuka Mizuno, Nitesh Mohan, Bhairavi Rajasekar, Suraj Bala, Madina Mahmoud, Allison Winter, Bolisa Savic, Stacie Dempsey, Kimberly Baynes, Sumit Sharma, Pulkit Chaudhury, Sunil K Srivastava
{"title":"筛查接受心血管评估的患者视网膜缺血性血管周围病变(RIPLs):一项横断面研究。","authors":"Victor Bellanda, Adrienne Delaney, Matthew J Schulgit, Gabriel Castilho S Barbosa, Andrea Arline, Yuka Mizuno, Nitesh Mohan, Bhairavi Rajasekar, Suraj Bala, Madina Mahmoud, Allison Winter, Bolisa Savic, Stacie Dempsey, Kimberly Baynes, Sumit Sharma, Pulkit Chaudhury, Sunil K Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retinal ischemic perivascular lesions (RIPLs) are optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings associated with chronic retinal ischemia. Previous studies have proposed that RIPLs may serve as anatomical biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of RIPLs in a cardiovascular clinic and assess their association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study of prospectively enrolled patients.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 559 patients undergoing cardiovascular ultrasound at a vascular imaging laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-mydriatic 6×6 mm OCT-Angiography scans were obtained on the same day of ultrasound, and RIPLs were manually identified based on inner retinal layer thinning with compensatory outer nuclear layer expansion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The prevalence of RIPLs was compared between patients with and without a history of MACE, defined as prior myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or coronary/carotid revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 559 included patients (mean age 61.9 ± 12.5 years; 54.4% female), 26.3% had at least one RIPL. A history of MACE was present in 35.1% of patients; however, the prevalence of RIPLs did not differ significantly between those with MACE (28.6%) and those without (25.1%) (p = 0.426), despite the MACE group having a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history (p < 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were found in subgroup analyses of patients with prior MI (p = 0.688), stroke/TIA (p = 0.394), or revascularization (p = 0.369). The prevalence of RIPLs did not differ across atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk categories in patients without prior MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, prospectively enrolled cardiovascular cohort, RIPLs were found in only a quarter of eyes, providing preliminary evidence for their prevalence in this population. Additionally, RIPLs were not significantly associated with a history of MACE. While RIPLs may reflect microvascular pathology, these findings challenge prior reports linking them to broader systemic cardiovascular disease and call for prospective longitudinal studies to clarify their clinical utility in cardiovascular risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening for Retinal Ischemic Perivascular Lesions (RIPLs) in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Bellanda, Adrienne Delaney, Matthew J Schulgit, Gabriel Castilho S Barbosa, Andrea Arline, Yuka Mizuno, Nitesh Mohan, Bhairavi Rajasekar, Suraj Bala, Madina Mahmoud, Allison Winter, Bolisa Savic, Stacie Dempsey, Kimberly Baynes, Sumit Sharma, Pulkit Chaudhury, Sunil K Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oret.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Retinal ischemic perivascular lesions (RIPLs) are optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings associated with chronic retinal ischemia. Previous studies have proposed that RIPLs may serve as anatomical biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of RIPLs in a cardiovascular clinic and assess their association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study of prospectively enrolled patients.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 559 patients undergoing cardiovascular ultrasound at a vascular imaging laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-mydriatic 6×6 mm OCT-Angiography scans were obtained on the same day of ultrasound, and RIPLs were manually identified based on inner retinal layer thinning with compensatory outer nuclear layer expansion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The prevalence of RIPLs was compared between patients with and without a history of MACE, defined as prior myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or coronary/carotid revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 559 included patients (mean age 61.9 ± 12.5 years; 54.4% female), 26.3% had at least one RIPL. A history of MACE was present in 35.1% of patients; however, the prevalence of RIPLs did not differ significantly between those with MACE (28.6%) and those without (25.1%) (p = 0.426), despite the MACE group having a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history (p < 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were found in subgroup analyses of patients with prior MI (p = 0.688), stroke/TIA (p = 0.394), or revascularization (p = 0.369). The prevalence of RIPLs did not differ across atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk categories in patients without prior MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, prospectively enrolled cardiovascular cohort, RIPLs were found in only a quarter of eyes, providing preliminary evidence for their prevalence in this population. Additionally, RIPLs were not significantly associated with a history of MACE. While RIPLs may reflect microvascular pathology, these findings challenge prior reports linking them to broader systemic cardiovascular disease and call for prospective longitudinal studies to clarify their clinical utility in cardiovascular risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2025.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:视网膜缺血性血管周围病变(RIPLs)是与慢性视网膜缺血相关的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)结果。先前的研究已经提出RIPLs可能作为心血管疾病的解剖学生物标志物,但其临床意义尚不确定。本研究旨在评估ripl在心血管临床中的患病率,并评估其与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系。设计:前瞻性入组患者的观察性横断面研究。参与者:559例患者在血管成像实验室接受心血管超声检查。方法:在超声检查当天进行无散瞳6×6 mm oct血管造影扫描,根据视网膜内层变薄和代偿性外核层扩张人工识别RIPLs。主要结局指标:比较有和没有MACE病史的患者的RIPLs患病率,MACE定义为既往心肌梗死(MI)、中风、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或冠状动脉/颈动脉血运重建术。结果:559例患者(平均年龄61.9±12.5岁,女性54.4%)中,26.3%的患者至少有1例RIPL。35.1%的患者有MACE病史;然而,尽管MACE组有更高的传统心血管危险因素,包括高血压、血脂异常、糖尿病和吸烟史,但MACE组(28.6%)和非MACE组(25.1%)的RIPLs患病率没有显著差异(p = 0.426)。同样,在既往心肌梗死(p = 0.688)、卒中/TIA (p = 0.394)或血运重建术(p = 0.369)患者的亚组分析中也没有发现显著差异。在没有MACE的患者中,RIPLs的患病率在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险类别中没有差异。结论:在这个大型的前瞻性心血管队列中,仅在四分之一的眼睛中发现了ripl,为其在该人群中的流行提供了初步证据。此外,ripl与MACE病史无显著相关性。虽然RIPLs可能反映微血管病理,但这些发现挑战了先前将其与更广泛的系统性心血管疾病联系起来的报道,并呼吁进行前瞻性纵向研究,以阐明其在心血管风险评估中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Screening for Retinal Ischemic Perivascular Lesions (RIPLs) in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Assessment: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: Retinal ischemic perivascular lesions (RIPLs) are optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings associated with chronic retinal ischemia. Previous studies have proposed that RIPLs may serve as anatomical biomarkers for cardiovascular disease, yet their clinical significance remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of RIPLs in a cardiovascular clinic and assess their association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Design: Observational cross-sectional study of prospectively enrolled patients.

Participants: A total of 559 patients undergoing cardiovascular ultrasound at a vascular imaging laboratory.

Methods: Non-mydriatic 6×6 mm OCT-Angiography scans were obtained on the same day of ultrasound, and RIPLs were manually identified based on inner retinal layer thinning with compensatory outer nuclear layer expansion.

Main outcome measures: The prevalence of RIPLs was compared between patients with and without a history of MACE, defined as prior myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or coronary/carotid revascularization.

Results: Among 559 included patients (mean age 61.9 ± 12.5 years; 54.4% female), 26.3% had at least one RIPL. A history of MACE was present in 35.1% of patients; however, the prevalence of RIPLs did not differ significantly between those with MACE (28.6%) and those without (25.1%) (p = 0.426), despite the MACE group having a higher prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history (p < 0.05). Similarly, no significant differences were found in subgroup analyses of patients with prior MI (p = 0.688), stroke/TIA (p = 0.394), or revascularization (p = 0.369). The prevalence of RIPLs did not differ across atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk categories in patients without prior MACE.

Conclusions: In this large, prospectively enrolled cardiovascular cohort, RIPLs were found in only a quarter of eyes, providing preliminary evidence for their prevalence in this population. Additionally, RIPLs were not significantly associated with a history of MACE. While RIPLs may reflect microvascular pathology, these findings challenge prior reports linking them to broader systemic cardiovascular disease and call for prospective longitudinal studies to clarify their clinical utility in cardiovascular risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信