子宫肌瘤手术后的宫腔粘连:发病率和预防策略。系统回顾。

IF 1 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Alexandros Lazaridis, Alexandros L Grammatis, Martin Hirsch, Olga Triantafyllidou, Funlayo Odejinmi, Nikos F Vlahos
{"title":"子宫肌瘤手术后的宫腔粘连:发病率和预防策略。系统回顾。","authors":"Alexandros Lazaridis, Alexandros L Grammatis, Martin Hirsch, Olga Triantafyllidou, Funlayo Odejinmi, Nikos F Vlahos","doi":"10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05733-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this review was to provide current evidence of the relationship between fibroid surgery (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic/robotic, open) and the formation of intrauterine adhesions (IUA).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic electronic literature search was conducted to provide a survey of the various surgical modalities and their relevant incidence of intrauterine adhesions. Utilizing PRISMA methodology the search identified 23 full text original studies that were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Our analysis identified 2437 cases reported in the international literature whereby the de novo formation of IUAs were systematically assessed with second look hysteroscopy at least 4 weeks and usually up to 3 months after the surgery. In our analysis, out of 1678 hysteroscopic cases the mean incidence was 9.4% for all different techniques, including monopolar or bipolar diathermy, cold loop and radio frequency ablation. The reported numbers for laparoscopic/robotic and open surgery were 399 and 360 cases respectively. The incidence of IUA following endoscopic abdominal surgery was 12.8% and for the traditional open approach (laparotomy) was 18.3%. There is substantial heterogeneity on the reported data regarding risks factors contributing to IUAs; such as fibroid size, location, number as well as uterine cavity breach during abdominal surgery (either open, laparoscopic or robotic).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iatrogenic IUAs following myomectomies are not uncommon and may be implicated in patient morbidity and sub fertility. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the prevention of such sequelae and improve therapeutic outcomes following fibroid surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18572,"journal":{"name":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrauterine adhesions following fibroid surgery: incidence and prevention strategies. A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandros Lazaridis, Alexandros L Grammatis, Martin Hirsch, Olga Triantafyllidou, Funlayo Odejinmi, Nikos F Vlahos\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05733-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this review was to provide current evidence of the relationship between fibroid surgery (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic/robotic, open) and the formation of intrauterine adhesions (IUA).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic electronic literature search was conducted to provide a survey of the various surgical modalities and their relevant incidence of intrauterine adhesions. Utilizing PRISMA methodology the search identified 23 full text original studies that were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Our analysis identified 2437 cases reported in the international literature whereby the de novo formation of IUAs were systematically assessed with second look hysteroscopy at least 4 weeks and usually up to 3 months after the surgery. In our analysis, out of 1678 hysteroscopic cases the mean incidence was 9.4% for all different techniques, including monopolar or bipolar diathermy, cold loop and radio frequency ablation. The reported numbers for laparoscopic/robotic and open surgery were 399 and 360 cases respectively. The incidence of IUA following endoscopic abdominal surgery was 12.8% and for the traditional open approach (laparotomy) was 18.3%. There is substantial heterogeneity on the reported data regarding risks factors contributing to IUAs; such as fibroid size, location, number as well as uterine cavity breach during abdominal surgery (either open, laparoscopic or robotic).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iatrogenic IUAs following myomectomies are not uncommon and may be implicated in patient morbidity and sub fertility. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the prevention of such sequelae and improve therapeutic outcomes following fibroid surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05733-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-606X.25.05733-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本综述的目的是提供子宫肌瘤手术(宫腔镜,腹腔镜/机器人,开放)与宫内粘连(IUA)形成之间关系的最新证据。证据获取:我们进行了系统的电子文献检索,以提供各种手术方式及其相关宫内粘连发生率的调查。利用PRISMA方法,搜索确定了23个全文原始研究,包括在分析中。证据综合:我们的分析确定了2437例国际文献报道的iua重新形成的病例,这些病例在术后至少4周,通常最多3个月,用第二眼宫腔镜系统地评估。在我们的分析中,在1678例宫腔镜病例中,包括单极或双极透热、冷环路和射频消融在内的所有不同技术的平均发生率为9.4%。报告的腹腔镜/机器人手术和开放手术分别为399例和360例。腹腔内窥镜手术后IUA的发生率为12.8%,传统开腹手术后IUA的发生率为18.3%。关于导致iua的风险因素的报告数据存在很大的异质性;如子宫肌瘤的大小、位置、数量以及腹部手术(无论是开放式、腹腔镜手术还是机器人手术)中子宫腔的破裂。结论:子宫肌瘤切除术后的医源性iua并不罕见,可能与患者发病率和生育能力低下有关。需要进一步的研究来评估对此类后遗症的预防和改善肌瘤手术后的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intrauterine adhesions following fibroid surgery: incidence and prevention strategies. A systematic review.

Introduction: The purpose of this review was to provide current evidence of the relationship between fibroid surgery (hysteroscopic, laparoscopic/robotic, open) and the formation of intrauterine adhesions (IUA).

Evidence acquisition: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted to provide a survey of the various surgical modalities and their relevant incidence of intrauterine adhesions. Utilizing PRISMA methodology the search identified 23 full text original studies that were included in the analysis.

Evidence synthesis: Our analysis identified 2437 cases reported in the international literature whereby the de novo formation of IUAs were systematically assessed with second look hysteroscopy at least 4 weeks and usually up to 3 months after the surgery. In our analysis, out of 1678 hysteroscopic cases the mean incidence was 9.4% for all different techniques, including monopolar or bipolar diathermy, cold loop and radio frequency ablation. The reported numbers for laparoscopic/robotic and open surgery were 399 and 360 cases respectively. The incidence of IUA following endoscopic abdominal surgery was 12.8% and for the traditional open approach (laparotomy) was 18.3%. There is substantial heterogeneity on the reported data regarding risks factors contributing to IUAs; such as fibroid size, location, number as well as uterine cavity breach during abdominal surgery (either open, laparoscopic or robotic).

Conclusions: Iatrogenic IUAs following myomectomies are not uncommon and may be implicated in patient morbidity and sub fertility. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the prevention of such sequelae and improve therapeutic outcomes following fibroid surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
Minerva obstetrics and gynecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
191
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信