极性和非极性洗枪溶剂组分对两种主要有机枪弹残留物通过一次性丁腈手套渗透特性的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Travis D Cribbs, Shane S Que Hee
{"title":"极性和非极性洗枪溶剂组分对两种主要有机枪弹残留物通过一次性丁腈手套渗透特性的影响。","authors":"Travis D Cribbs, Shane S Que Hee","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2537391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the hazards posed by lead in gunshot residues (GSRs) are recognized, little is known about the glove permeation of the organic components. The permeation behavior of the major organic GSRs methyl centralite and ethyl centralite through disposable nitrile glove material was investigated. The compounds were contained in three solvents: Hoppe's no. 9 gun cleaning solvent (GCS), n-decane, and a GCS surrogate, n-decane/ethanol 7:3 (w/w) mixture. The aim was to identify whether ethanol was the key driver of a previously reported carrier effect. A modified ASTM F739-20 method was used for permeation testing at 35.0 ± 0.5 °C with closed-loop n-decane collection solvent without recirculation. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis facilitated GSR quantification. Significant differences occurred in intrarun but not interrun glove physical characteristics and in analyte permeation for the GCS and its surrogate. The GCS caused a substantial increase in permeation rate before a lower steady state permeation rate (SSPR). In contrast, n-decane/ethanol produced its SSPRs as the maximum permeation rate, but with decreased permeation rates and total permeated analyte mass. n-Decane solvent caused none of the GSR to enter the steady state and exhibited much longer breakthrough times. This study underscores the importance of considering the complete chemical composition of mixtures in assessing their interactions with glove personal protective equipment (PPE) and highlights the need for comprehensive testing protocols in PPE selection. Limitations included the lack of previous research on organic GSR glove permeation and challenges in comparing study results with manufacturer-reported glove resistance data. Adjusted concentrations for analytes and stepwise reconstitution of GCS components are recommended for future investigations. The present research provided insight into the glove permeation behavior of complex chemical mixtures for better glove PPE selection and testing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of polar and non-polar gun-cleaning solvent components on permeation characteristics of two major organic gunshot residues through disposable nitrile gloves.\",\"authors\":\"Travis D Cribbs, Shane S Que Hee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15459624.2025.2537391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While the hazards posed by lead in gunshot residues (GSRs) are recognized, little is known about the glove permeation of the organic components. The permeation behavior of the major organic GSRs methyl centralite and ethyl centralite through disposable nitrile glove material was investigated. The compounds were contained in three solvents: Hoppe's no. 9 gun cleaning solvent (GCS), n-decane, and a GCS surrogate, n-decane/ethanol 7:3 (w/w) mixture. The aim was to identify whether ethanol was the key driver of a previously reported carrier effect. A modified ASTM F739-20 method was used for permeation testing at 35.0 ± 0.5 °C with closed-loop n-decane collection solvent without recirculation. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis facilitated GSR quantification. Significant differences occurred in intrarun but not interrun glove physical characteristics and in analyte permeation for the GCS and its surrogate. The GCS caused a substantial increase in permeation rate before a lower steady state permeation rate (SSPR). In contrast, n-decane/ethanol produced its SSPRs as the maximum permeation rate, but with decreased permeation rates and total permeated analyte mass. n-Decane solvent caused none of the GSR to enter the steady state and exhibited much longer breakthrough times. This study underscores the importance of considering the complete chemical composition of mixtures in assessing their interactions with glove personal protective equipment (PPE) and highlights the need for comprehensive testing protocols in PPE selection. Limitations included the lack of previous research on organic GSR glove permeation and challenges in comparing study results with manufacturer-reported glove resistance data. Adjusted concentrations for analytes and stepwise reconstitution of GCS components are recommended for future investigations. The present research provided insight into the glove permeation behavior of complex chemical mixtures for better glove PPE selection and testing practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2537391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2537391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然枪弹残留物(GSRs)中铅所造成的危害是公认的,但对有机成分在手套中的渗透却知之甚少。研究了主要有机gsr甲基中心石和乙基中心石在一次性丁腈手套材料中的渗透行为。这些化合物包含在三种溶剂中:Hoppe's no。9 .枪清洗溶剂(GCS),正癸烷,和GCS替代物,正癸烷/乙醇7:3 (w/w)混合物。目的是确定乙醇是否是先前报道的载体效应的关键驱动因素。采用改进的ASTM F739-20方法,在35.0±0.5°C下使用闭环正癸烷收集溶剂进行渗透测试,无需再循环。气相色谱-质谱分析促进了GSR的定量。GCS及其替代品在手套内而非手套间的物理特性和分析物渗透方面存在显著差异。在较低的稳态渗透速率(SSPR)之前,GCS引起了渗透速率的大幅增加。相比之下,正癸烷/乙醇的SSPRs以最大渗透速率产生,但渗透速率和总渗透分析物质量降低。正癸烷溶剂使GSR均未进入稳定状态,并表现出较长的突破时间。这项研究强调了在评估其与手套个人防护装备(PPE)的相互作用时考虑混合物完整化学成分的重要性,并强调了在PPE选择中需要全面的测试方案。局限性包括缺乏对有机GSR手套渗透的先前研究,以及在将研究结果与制造商报告的手套电阻数据进行比较方面存在挑战。建议调整分析物浓度和逐步重建GCS成分,以供今后的研究。本研究为了解复杂化学混合物的手套渗透行为提供了见解,为更好的手套PPE选择和测试实践提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of polar and non-polar gun-cleaning solvent components on permeation characteristics of two major organic gunshot residues through disposable nitrile gloves.

While the hazards posed by lead in gunshot residues (GSRs) are recognized, little is known about the glove permeation of the organic components. The permeation behavior of the major organic GSRs methyl centralite and ethyl centralite through disposable nitrile glove material was investigated. The compounds were contained in three solvents: Hoppe's no. 9 gun cleaning solvent (GCS), n-decane, and a GCS surrogate, n-decane/ethanol 7:3 (w/w) mixture. The aim was to identify whether ethanol was the key driver of a previously reported carrier effect. A modified ASTM F739-20 method was used for permeation testing at 35.0 ± 0.5 °C with closed-loop n-decane collection solvent without recirculation. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis facilitated GSR quantification. Significant differences occurred in intrarun but not interrun glove physical characteristics and in analyte permeation for the GCS and its surrogate. The GCS caused a substantial increase in permeation rate before a lower steady state permeation rate (SSPR). In contrast, n-decane/ethanol produced its SSPRs as the maximum permeation rate, but with decreased permeation rates and total permeated analyte mass. n-Decane solvent caused none of the GSR to enter the steady state and exhibited much longer breakthrough times. This study underscores the importance of considering the complete chemical composition of mixtures in assessing their interactions with glove personal protective equipment (PPE) and highlights the need for comprehensive testing protocols in PPE selection. Limitations included the lack of previous research on organic GSR glove permeation and challenges in comparing study results with manufacturer-reported glove resistance data. Adjusted concentrations for analytes and stepwise reconstitution of GCS components are recommended for future investigations. The present research provided insight into the glove permeation behavior of complex chemical mixtures for better glove PPE selection and testing practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信