{"title":"评估晚期子宫内膜癌的治疗策略:原发性细胞减少手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减体积手术- 10年单中心经验。","authors":"Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald","doi":"10.1155/ogi/7202848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction/Background:</b> Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. <b>Results:</b> Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (<i>n</i> = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (<i>n</i> = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, <i>p</i>=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, <i>p</i>=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, <i>p</i>=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, <i>p</i>=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (<i>n</i> = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (<i>p</i>=0.823). <b>Conclusion:</b> This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7202848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ogi/7202848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction/Background:</b> Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. <b>Results:</b> Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (<i>n</i> = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (<i>n</i> = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, <i>p</i>=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, <i>p</i>=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, <i>p</i>=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, <i>p</i>=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (<i>n</i> = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (<i>p</i>=0.823). <b>Conclusion:</b> This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"7202848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/7202848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/7202848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.
Introduction/Background: Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. Results: Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (n = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (n = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, p < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, p=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, p=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, p=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, p=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (n = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (n = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (p=0.823). Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.
期刊介绍:
Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.