评估晚期子宫内膜癌的治疗策略:原发性细胞减少手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减体积手术- 10年单中心经验。

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ogi/7202848
Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald
{"title":"评估晚期子宫内膜癌的治疗策略:原发性细胞减少手术与新辅助化疗后间隔减体积手术- 10年单中心经验。","authors":"Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald","doi":"10.1155/ogi/7202848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction/Background:</b> Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. <b>Results:</b> Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (<i>n</i> = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (<i>n</i> = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, <i>p</i>=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, <i>p</i>=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, <i>p</i>=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, <i>p</i>=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (<i>n</i> = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (<i>p</i>=0.823). <b>Conclusion:</b> This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7202848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelwanis Mohamed Abdelaziz, Ahmed Mohamed, Siddesh Prabhulingam, Ambreen Yaseen, Khaled Sabrah, Fatini Hussin, Riyam Aldulaimi, Hazem Elsheikh, Ashu Loona, Irshad Soomro, Ketankumar Gajjar, Benjamin Wormald\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ogi/7202848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction/Background:</b> Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. <b>Methodology:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. <b>Results:</b> Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (<i>n</i> = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (<i>n</i> = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, <i>p</i>=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, <i>p</i>=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, <i>p</i>=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, <i>p</i>=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (<i>n</i> = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (<i>p</i>=0.823). <b>Conclusion:</b> This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"7202848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/7202848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/7202848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/背景:晚期子宫内膜癌(EC)的治疗提出了一个重大的治疗挑战,关于最佳治疗顺序的争论正在进行中。原发性细胞减少手术(PCSs)与辅助治疗和新辅助化疗后的间隔减容手术(NACT-IDS)都是治疗策略。本研究分析了诺丁汉大学医院癌症中心两种治疗策略的结果。方法:我们对2013年至2023年间在本中心治疗的晚期EC (FIGO III-IV期)患者进行了回顾性队列分析。接受PCS辅助治疗或新辅助化疗后间隔减容手术(NACT-IDS)的患者被纳入研究。数据收集包括人口统计学特征、治疗方法、手术参数和结果测量。主要结局是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括围手术期结局和复发情况。结果:治疗途径包括NACT-IDS (n = 8)和PCS辅助治疗(n = 57)。与PCS组相比,接受NACT-IDS治疗的患者IV期疾病明显更普遍(75.0%对5.3%,p < 0.001)。分析显示,NACT-IDS患者的PFS持续时间为18.5个月,而PCS患者的PFS持续时间更长,为35.5个月(HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, p=0.328)。NACT-IDS组的中位OS为22.0个月,而PCS组为41.0个月(HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, p=0.145)。NACT-IDS组平均手术时间更长(239.7 vs 165.5 min, p=0.209)。所有NACT-IDS手术均通过开腹手术进行,而PCS组为49.1% (p < 0.001)。NACT-IDS组住院时间明显更长(中位数8天vs 3天,p=0.036)。25.0% (n = 2)的NACT-IDS患者接受放疗,59.6% (n = 34)的PCS患者接受放疗。NACT-IDS组的复发率为37.5%,高于PCS组的33.3% (p=0.823)。结论:这一综合分析为晚期EC的治疗结果和手术参数提供了有价值的见解。虽然NACT-IDS队列的小样本量限制了得出明确结论的能力,但该研究提供了有意义的证据,可以为临床决策提供信息。这些发现为未来的前瞻性多中心研究奠定了重要的基础,这些研究旨在优化这种具有挑战性疾病的患者选择和治疗序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.

Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.

Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.

Evaluating Treatment Strategies in Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Interval Debulking Surgery-A Ten-Year Single-Centre Experience.

Introduction/Background: Management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge, with ongoing debate regarding optimal treatment sequencing. Primary cytoreductive surgeries (PCSs) with adjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are both employed as treatment strategies. This study analyses outcomes of both treatment strategies in Nottingham University Hospitals Cancer Centre. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced EC (FIGO Stages III-IV) treated at our centre between 2013 and 2023. Patients who received either PCS with adjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval Debulking surgery (NACT-IDS) are included in the study. Data collection included demographic characteristics, treatment approaches, surgical parameters, and outcome measures. Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and recurrence patterns. Results: Treatment pathways included NACT-IDS (n = 8) and PCS with adjuvant therapy (n = 57). Stage IV disease was notably more prevalent in patients who received NACT-IDS therapy compared to the PCS group (75.0% versus 5.3%, p < 0.001). Analysis revealed a PFS duration of 18.5 months for NACT-IDS patients, whilst PCS patients demonstrated a longer duration of 35.5 months (HR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.56-2.48, p=0.328). Median OS was 22.0 months in the NACT-IDS group versus 41.0 months in the PCS group (HR 1.35, 95% CI: 0.64-2.83, p=0.145). Mean operative time was longer in the NACT-IDS group (239.7 vs 165.5 min, p=0.209). All NACT-IDS procedures were performed via open laparotomy compared to 49.1% in the PCS group (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the NACT-IDS group (median 8 vs 3 days, p=0.036). Radiotherapy was administered to 25.0% (n = 2) of NACT-IDS patients and 59.6% (n = 34) of PCS patients. Recurrence rates were higher in the NACT-IDS group, 37.5%, compared to 33.3% in the PCS patients (p=0.823). Conclusion: This comprehensive analysis provides valuable insights into treatment outcomes and surgical parameters for advanced EC. Whilst the small sample size of the NACT-IDS cohort limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions, the study provides meaningful evidence that can inform clinical decision-making. The findings lay important groundwork for future prospective, multicentre studies aimed at optimising patient selection and treatment sequencing in this challenging disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信